Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Olympus E-M10 II has external dimensions of 120 x 83 x 47 mm (4.72 x 3.27 x 1.85″) and weighs 390 g (0.86 lb / 13.76 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm X-T4 has external dimensions of 135 x 93 x 84 mm (5.31 x 3.66 x 3.31″) and weighs 607 g (1.34 lb / 21.41 oz) (including batteries).
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4. Olympus E-M10 II is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 15mm narrower, 10mm shorter and 17mm thinner than Fujifilm X-T4.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Camera Size Comparison - Front View]()
Comparison image of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View
Here is the back view size comparison of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Camera Size Comparison - Back View]()
Comparison image of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 Size and Weight - Back View
Now lets look at the top view comparison of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Camera Size Comparison - Top View]()
Top View Comparison image of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 Size
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Olympus E-M10 II is significantly lighter (217g ) than the Fujifilm X-T4 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.
Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. Since Fujifilm X-T4 has an APS-C sized sensor and Olympus E-M10 II has a smaller Four Thirds sensor, Olympus E-M10 II's lenses for a similar focal length and aperture will generally be lighter and smaller than the Fujifilm X-T4 lenses.
Weight Comparison
Mirrorless Cameras
Thickness Comparison
Mirrorless Cameras
Weather Sealing
Thanks to the weather sealed body of X-T4, you can use this camera with more confidence under conditions where there is risk of exposure to water and dust compared to E-M10 II.
LCD Screen Size and Features
Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.
Olympus E-M10 II features a
Tilting only screen which is mostly only good for shooting from waist or over the head levels. On the other hand, Fujifilm X-T4 sports a
Fully Articulated screen which is more flexible and useful especially for taking Selfie shots and video.
Olympus E-M10 II has a 16.0MP Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features TruePic VII processor. On the other hand, Fujifilm X-T4 has a 26.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm ) sized X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor .
Fujifilm X-T4's sensor provides 10MP more than Olympus E-M10 II's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely.
On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.
One other difference between these two cameras that is worth mentioning is that Fujifilm X-T4's sensor doesn't have an anti-alias (Low-Pass) filter. Removing anti-alias filter increases the sharpness and level of detail but at the same time, it increases the chance of moire occurring in certain scenes.
Below you can see the E-M10 II and X-T4 sensor size comparison.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Sensor Size Comparison]()
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 Cameras
As seen above, Fujifilm X-T4 has a 1.6x Larger sensor area than Olympus E-M10 II. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
Number of available lenses is a big decision factor while choosing your interchangeable lens camera. When we look at the available lenses for these two cameras, we see that Olympus E-M10 II has an advantage over Fujifilm X-T4. There are 107 lenses for Olympus E-M10 II's Micro Four Thirds mount, on the other hand there are only 56 lenses for Fujifilm X-T4's Fujifilm X lens mount.
Another important factor is the availability of image stabilization. Both Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 has Sensor based Image stabilization which means that all the lenses will be stabilized in these bodies.
| Lens Type |
# of Olympus E-M10 II Lenses |
# of Fujifilm X-T4 Lenses |
| Standard Zoom |
15 |
6 |
| Standard Prime |
13 |
14 |
| Wideangle Zoom |
5 |
3 |
| Wideangle Prime |
29 |
17 |
| Telephoto Zoom |
18 |
5 |
| Telephoto Prime |
9 |
5 |
| SuperZoom |
8 |
1 |
| Wideangle Fisheye Prime |
5 |
1 |
| Macro Prime |
4 |
2 |
| Perspective Control Prime |
n/a |
2 |
| Telephoto Mirror Prime |
1 |
n/a |
| TOTAL |
107 |
56 |
Now let's compare some sample lenses from each mount with typical Focal ranges for Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 to see how these lenses compares:
Fast Standard Zoom Lenses
Fast Tele Zoom Equivalent Lenses
Fast Normal Prime Equivalent Lenses
Fast Wideangle Zoom Equivalent Lenses
24-105mm f4 Equivalent Lenses
Super-Tele Zoom Equivalent Lenses
In this section, we rank and compare Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.
Olympus E-M10 II for Portrait Photography
Fujifilm X-T4 for Portrait Photography
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 26.0MP
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Olympus E-M10 II for Street Photography
Fujifilm X-T4 for Street Photography
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Medium sized Body
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fully Articulated LCD Screen
Medium sized Body
Read the details
Olympus E-M10 II for Sports Photography
Fujifilm X-T4 for Sports Photography
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Fast Continuous Shooting: 8.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
81 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Fast Continuous Shooting: 15.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/8000s
425 Focus Points
Good Low Light ISO
Wireless Connection
Anti Flicker feature
Read the details
Olympus E-M10 II for Daily Photography
Fujifilm X-T4 for Daily Photography
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Medium size Body
390g
Body Thickness 47mm
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Environmental Sealings
Anti Flicker feature
Medium size Body
607g
Body Thickness 64mm
Read the details
Olympus E-M10 II for Landscape Photography
Fujifilm X-T4 for Landscape Photography
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Live-view
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 26.0MP
Environmental Sealings
Live-view
Read the details
You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4, below you can find their scores in five different aspects.
Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.
Here is a summary of how Olympus E-M10 II and Fujifilm X-T4 scores compare:
Olympus E-M10 II
Ranked
#49 out of 86 in SLR-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked
#99 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Fujifilm X-T4
Ranked
#23 out of 86 in SLR-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked
#27 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Fujifilm X-T4 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Olympus E-M10 II in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Olympus E-M10 II. Otherwise, Fujifilm X-T4 is the better camera overall.
| General |
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Fujifilm X-T4 |
| Brand |
Olympus |
Fujifilm |
| Announced |
2015-08-25 |
2020-02-24 |
| Body Type |
SLR-style mirrorless |
SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor |
|
|
| Type |
CMOS |
X-Trans CMOS 4 |
| Size |
Four Thirds |
APS-C |
| Dimensions |
17.3 x 13 mm |
23.5 x 15.6 mm |
| Area |
224.90mm2 |
366.60mm2 |
| Megapixels |
16 megapixels |
26 megapixels |
| Max Resolution |
4608 x 3456 |
6240 x 4160 |
| Max Native Light sensitivity |
25,600 ISO |
12,800 ISO |
| Max Boosted Light Sensitivity |
- |
51200 ISO |
| Min Native Light sensitivity |
200 ISO |
160 ISO |
| Min Boosted Light Sensitivity |
100 ISO |
80 ISO |
| RAW Support |
|
|
Autofocus |
|
|
| AF Touch |
|
|
| AF Continuous |
|
|
| AF Single |
|
|
| AF Tracking |
|
|
| AF Selective |
|
|
| AF Center |
|
|
| AF Multi Area |
|
|
| AF Live View |
|
|
| AF Face Detection |
|
|
| AF Contrast Detection |
|
|
| AF Phase Detection |
|
|
| Number of Focus Points |
81 |
425 |
Lens |
|
|
| Manual Focus |
|
|
| Lens Mount |
Micro Four Thirds |
Fujifilm X |
| Number of Available Lenses |
107 |
56 |
Screen |
|
|
| Type |
Tilting |
Fully Articulated |
| Size |
3 |
3 |
| Resolution |
1,040k dots |
1,620k dots |
| Touch Screen |
|
|
Viewfinder |
|
|
| Viewfinder |
Electronic |
Electronic |
| Viewfinder Resolution |
2,360k dots |
3,690k dots |
| Viewfinder Coverage |
100% |
100% |
| Viewfinder Magnification |
0.62x |
0.75x |
Photography Features |
|
|
| Max Mechanical Shutter |
1/4000s |
1/8000s |
| Max Electronic Shutter |
n/a |
1/32000s |
| Shutter Priority |
|
|
| Aperture Priority |
|
|
| Manual Exposure Mode |
|
|
| Custom White Balance |
|
|
| Image Stabilization |
Sensor-shift |
Sensor-shift |
| Built-in Flash |
|
|
| Flash Range |
5.80 m (ISO 100) |
no built-in flash |
| Max Flash Sync |
n/a |
1/250s |
| External Flash |
|
|
| Continuous Shooting |
8.0 fps |
15.0 fps |
| Multi-Segment |
|
|
| Average |
|
|
| Spot |
|
|
| Partial |
|
|
| AF-Area |
|
|
| Center Weighted |
|
|
| AE Bracketing |
|
|
| WB Bracketing |
|
|
Video Features |
|
|
| Max Video Resolution |
1920 x 1080 |
4096 x 2160 |
| Video Formats |
H.264, Motion JPEG |
MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
| Microphone Port |
|
|
| Headphone Port |
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
| Wireless Connectivity |
Built-In |
Built-In |
| HDMI |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
| Environmental Sealing |
|
|
| Weight |
390g |
607g |
| Dimensions |
120 x 83 x 47mm |
135 x 93 x 64mm |
| Battery Life |
320 shots |
500 shots |
Other Features |
|
|
| Timelapse Recording |
|
|
| GPS |
None |
None |
DxO Sensor Scores |
|
|
| DxO Overall Score |
73 |
not tested |
| DxO Color Depth |
23.1 |
not tested |
| DxO Dynamic Range |
12.5 |
not tested |
| DxO Low Light ISO |
842 |
not tested |
|
Report a correction |
Report a correction |