Both Leica M Typ 240 and Canon M3 have 24.0 MP resolution sensors but Leica M Typ 240's sensor is Full frame (36 x 24 mm ) and Canon M3's sensor is APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm ).
Since Leica M Typ 240's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Canon M3.
Below you can see the M Typ 240 and M3 sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Leica M Typ 240 and Canon M3 Cameras
As seen above, Leica M Typ 240 has a 2.6x Larger sensor area than Canon M3. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
DxOMark Sensor Scores
Both Leica M Typ 240 and Canon M3 sensors have been tested by DxoMark. DxoMark scores camera sensors for color depth (DXO Portrait), dynamic range (DXO Landscape) and low-light sensitivity (DXO Sports), and also gives them an overall score. Of the two cameras that we are comparing, M Typ 240 has scored 84, 12 points higher than M3.
Model
Overall
Color Depth
Dynamic Range
Low-light ISO
Leica M Typ 240
84
24.0 bits
13.3 Evs
1860 ISO
Canon M3
72
22.8 bits
11.8 Evs
1169 ISO
Sensor size sets the circle of confusion, so it drives how much depth of field each
of these bodies gives you at a given aperture. You can calculate it exactly for the
Leica M Typ 240
or the
Canon M3 ,
including hyperfocal distance.
One thing to watch when comparing these two: they have different sensor sizes
(Full frame versus APS-C),
so compare them at the same framing rather than the same focal length.
Put the same focal length on the smaller sensor and it will show less depth of
field, not more, because it also crops tighter. The calculator shows the
full frame equivalent focal length for each body so you can match the framing.
