Both Canon M100 and Leica M Typ 240 have 24.0 MP resolution sensors but Canon M100's sensor is APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm ) and Leica M Typ 240's sensor is Full frame (36 x 24 mm ).
Since Leica M Typ 240's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Canon M100.
Below you can see the M100 and M Typ 240 sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Canon M100 and Leica M Typ 240 Cameras
As seen above, Leica M Typ 240 has a 2.6x Larger sensor area than Canon M100. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
DxOMark Sensor Scores
DxOMark is a benchmark that scientifically assesses image quality of camera sensors. It scores camera sensors for color depth (DXO Portrait), dynamic range (DXO Landscape) and low-light sensitivity (DXO Sports), and also gives them an overall score. Canon M100 and Leica M Typ 240 sensors have been tested by DxO and the results show that M Typ 240 has a better overall score of 84, 5 points higher compared to M100's score of 79.
Model
Overall
Color Depth
Dynamic Range
Low-light ISO
Canon M100
79
23.5 bits
13.0 Evs
1272 ISO
Leica M Typ 240
84
24.0 bits
13.3 Evs
1860 ISO
Sensor size sets the circle of confusion, so it drives how much depth of field each
of these bodies gives you at a given aperture. You can calculate it exactly for the
Canon M100
or the
Leica M Typ 240 ,
including hyperfocal distance.
One thing to watch when comparing these two: they have different sensor sizes
(APS-C versus Full frame),
so compare them at the same framing rather than the same focal length.
Put the same focal length on the smaller sensor and it will show less depth of
field, not more, because it also crops tighter. The calculator shows the
full frame equivalent focal length for each body so you can match the framing.
