Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions.
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D. Sigma Quattro H is 3mm narrower and 3mm shorter than Hasselblad X1D but it is also 20mm thicker.
Here is the back view size comparison of Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D.
Now lets look at the top view comparison of Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D.
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Sigma Quattro H is 725g lighter than the Hasselblad X1D but we don't think this will make a significant difference.
Also keep in mind that body weight is not the only deciding factor when comparing two interchangeable camera bodies, you have to also take into account the lenses that you will be using with these bodies. Since Hasselblad X1D has a Medium format sensor and Sigma Quattro H has a smaller APS-H sensor, Sigma Quattro H's lenses for a similar focal length and aperture will generally be lighter and smaller than the Hasselblad X1D lenses.
Weight Comparison
Mirrorless Cameras
Thickness Comparison
Mirrorless Cameras
Weather Sealing
Both Quattro H and X1D have weather sealings in their body, making them resistant to water and dust.
LCD Screen Size and Features
Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".
Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don\'t tilt or flip in directions.
Sigma Quattro H has a 45.0MP APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm ) sized CMOS (Foveon X3) sensor and features Dual TRUE III processor. On the other hand, Hasselblad X1D has a 51.0MP Medium format (44 x 33 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .
Hasselblad X1D's sensor provides 6MP more than Sigma Quattro H's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely.
On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.
Below you can see the Quattro H and X1D sensor size comparison.
As seen above, Hasselblad X1D has a 3.0x Larger sensor area than Sigma Quattro H. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
In this section, we rank and compare Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.
Sigma Quattro H for Portrait Photography
Hasselblad X1D for Portrait Photography
Large APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 45.0MP
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Large Medium format (44 x 33 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 51.0MP
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Sigma Quattro H for Street Photography
Hasselblad X1D for Street Photography
Large APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm) sensor
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Large Medium format (44 x 33 mm) sensor
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Sigma Quattro H for Sports Photography
Hasselblad X1D for Sports Photography
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Average Continuous Shooting: 3.8fps
No Image Stabilization
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.8fps
9 Focus Points
Read the details
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Environmental Sealings
Good Low Light ISO
Wireless Connection
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.3fps
Focus Points
Read the details
Sigma Quattro H for Daily Photography
Hasselblad X1D for Daily Photography
Large APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm) sensor
Environmental Sealings
Medium size Body
Body Thickness 91mm
Read the details
Large Medium format (44 x 33 mm) sensor
Environmental Sealings
Medium size Body
725g
Body Thickness 71mm
Read the details
Sigma Quattro H for Landscape Photography
Hasselblad X1D for Landscape Photography
Large APS-H (26.6 x 17.9 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 45.0MP
Environmental Sealings
Live-view
Read the details
Large Medium format (44 x 33 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 51.0MP
Environmental Sealings
Live-view
Read the details
Number of available lenses is a big decision factor while choosing your interchangeable lens camera. When we look at the available lenses for these two cameras, we see that Sigma Quattro H has an advantage over Hasselblad X1D. There are 76 lenses for Sigma Quattro H's Sigma SA Bayonet mount, on the other hand there are only 3 lenses for Hasselblad X1D's Hasselblad X lens mount.
Another important factor is the availability of image stabilization. None of these bodies have sensor based image stabilization so you have to buy lenses with Optical stabilization feature. Currently there are 23 lenses for Sigma SA Bayonet mount and 0 lenses for Hasselblad X mount with IS.
| Lens Type |
# of Sigma Quattro H Lenses |
# of Hasselblad X1D Lenses |
| Standard Zoom |
9 |
n/a |
| Standard Prime |
5 |
1 |
| Wideangle Zoom |
8 |
n/a |
| Wideangle Prime |
8 |
2 |
| Telephoto Zoom |
18 |
n/a |
| Telephoto Prime |
8 |
n/a |
| SuperZoom |
9 |
n/a |
| Wideangle Fisheye Prime |
4 |
n/a |
| Macro Prime |
7 |
n/a |
| Perspective Control Prime |
n/a |
n/a |
| Telephoto Mirror Prime |
n/a |
n/a |
| TOTAL |
76 |
3 |
You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D, below you can find their scores in five different aspects.
Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.
Here is a summary of how Sigma Quattro H and Hasselblad X1D scores compare:
Sigma Quattro H
Ranked
#74 out of 125 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked
#317 out of 1196 in all Cameras
Hasselblad X1D
Ranked
#2 out of 125 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked
#18 out of 1196 in all Cameras
Hasselblad X1D is the clear winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Sigma Quattro H in all criteria.
It has better general image quality, more features, more compact body and offers more value for the money
| General |
Sigma sd Quattro H |
Hasselblad X1D |
| Brand |
Sigma |
Hasselblad |
| Announced |
2016-02-23 |
2016-06-22 |
| Body Type |
Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor |
|
|
| Type |
CMOS (Foveon X3) |
CMOS |
| Size |
APS-H |
Medium format |
| Dimensions |
26.6 x 17.9 mm |
44 x 33 mm |
| Area |
476.14mm2 |
1452.00mm2 |
| Megapixels |
45 megapixels |
51 megapixels |
| Max Resolution |
6200 x 4152 |
8272 x 6200 |
| Max Native Light sensitivity |
6,400 ISO |
25,600 ISO |
| Min Native Light sensitivity |
100 ISO |
100 ISO |
| RAW Support |
|
|
Autofocus |
|
|
| AF Touch |
|
|
| AF Continuous |
|
|
| AF Single |
|
|
| AF Tracking |
|
|
| AF Selective |
|
|
| AF Center |
|
|
| AF Multi Area |
|
|
| AF Live View |
|
|
| AF Face Detection |
|
|
| AF Contrast Detection |
|
|
| AF Phase Detection |
|
|
| Number of Focus Points |
9 |
n/a |
Lens |
|
|
| Manual Focus |
|
|
| Lens Mount |
Sigma SA Bayonet |
Hasselblad X |
| Number of Available Lenses |
76 |
3 |
Screen |
|
|
| Type |
Fixed type |
Fixed type |
| Size |
3" |
3" |
| Resolution |
1,620k dots |
920k dots |
| Touch Screen |
|
|
Viewfinder |
|
|
| Viewfinder |
Electronic |
Electronic |
| Viewfinder Resolution |
2,360k dots |
2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder Coverage |
100% |
100% |
| Viewfinder Magnification |
0.73 |
n/a |
Photography Features |
|
|
| Max Shutter Speed |
1/4000s |
1/2000s |
| Shutter Priority |
|
|
| Aperture Priority |
|
|
| Manual Exposure Mode |
|
|
| Custom White Balance |
|
|
| Image Stabilization |
No |
No |
| Built-in Flash |
|
|
| Max Flash Sync |
no built-in flash |
1/2000s |
| External Flash |
|
|
| Continuous Shooting |
3.8 fps |
2.3 fps |
| Multi-Segment |
|
|
| Average |
|
|
| Spot |
|
|
| Partial |
|
|
| AF-Area |
|
|
| Center Weighted |
|
|
| AE Bracketing |
|
|
| WB Bracketing |
|
|
Video Features |
|
|
| Max Video Resolution |
n/a |
1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats |
n/a |
H.264 |
| Microphone Port |
|
|
| Headphone Port |
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
| Wireless Connectivity |
None |
Built-In |
| HDMI |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
| Environmental Sealing |
|
|
| Weight |
n/a |
725g |
| Dimensions |
147 x 95 x 91mm |
150 x 98 x 71mm |
| Battery Life |
n/a |
n/a |
Other Features |
|
|
| Timelapse Recording |
|
|
| GPS |
None |
Built-in |
DxO Sensor Scores |
|
|
| DxO Overall Score |
not tested |
102 |
| DxO Color Depth |
not tested |
26.2 |
| DxO Dynamic Range |
not tested |
14.8 |
| DxO Low Light ISO |
not tested |
4489 |
|
Report a correction |
Report a correction |