Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh G900

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Olympus TG-4

16 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing G900 and TG-4, two Waterproof cameras from Ricoh and Olympus. Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Ricoh G900 has a 20.0 MP and Olympus TG-4 has a 16.0 MP resolution. Ricoh G900 was introduced to market in February 2018 and Olympus TG-4 was launched in April 2015. As you can see, TG-4 is 3 years older than G900. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

Digital only Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840x2160 video resolution

247g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2015-04-13

16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

5.0 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

Built-in GPS

247g. 112 x 66 x 31 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Replaced Olympus Tough TG-3 Compare

Olympus TG-4 was replaced by Olympus Tough TG-5. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Olympus Tough TG-4
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Ricoh G900

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Ricoh G900 over Olympus Tough TG-4

Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 16 MP	25% more pixels
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 460k dots	126% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Focal Length - Tele	140mm vs 100mm	40 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5x vs 4x	more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution	3840x2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Reasons to choose Olympus Tough TG-4 over Ricoh G900

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Supports FlashAir SD cards	Better connectivity
Live Composite Mode	Yes vs No	Excellent help for long-exposure photography
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Number of Focus Points	25 vs 9	16 more focus points
Battery Life	380 shots vs 340 shots	40 more frames with a single charge
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 28mm	3 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	2.00 vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.50	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	7.9m vs 5.5m	2.4m longer range
Focus Bracketing	Yes vs No	Take multiple photos shifting focus point
Focus Stacking	Yes vs No	Stacks photos in-camera to maximize depth of field
Smartphone Remote	Yes vs No	Remote control your camera with a smartphone

Common Strengths of Ricoh G900 and Olympus Tough TG-4

Image Stabilization	Digital only vs Sensor-shift	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Manual Focusing	Yes vs Yes	both have manual focusing modes
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs Yes	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs Yes	creative shooting

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh G900 and Olympus Tough TG-4

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
Manual Exposure	No vs No	No manual exposure control

Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh G900 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries). Olympus TG-4 has external dimensions of 112 x 66 x 31 mm (4.41 x 2.6 x 1.22″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4. Ricoh G900 has the same height with Olympus TG-4. On the other hand, with a width of 118mm, it is 6 wider and also with a thickness of 33mm, it is 2mm thicker than Olympus TG-4.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 have exactly the same weight of 247g.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

G900

TG-4

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

G900

TG-4

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh G900 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Olympus TG-4 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features TruePic VII processor.

Below you can see the G900 and TG-4 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 Cameras

Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4 Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh G900 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Olympus TG-4 features a 25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 4x zoom lens.

Olympus TG-4 has 3mm wider coverage than the Ricoh G900. At f2.00, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Ricoh G900 has 40mm longer reach than the Olympus TG-4. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Olympus TG-4 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

G900

TG-4

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

G900

TG-4

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

G900

TG-4

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

G900

TG-4

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh G900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-4 for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.00
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
25 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-4 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
247g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
247g
Environmental Sealings
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Built-in GPS
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Ricoh G900 vs Olympus TG-4: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh G900 and Olympus TG-4 scores compare:

Ricoh G900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #71 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #514 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-4

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #18 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #336 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-4 has a higher Overall Score than the Ricoh G900 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh G900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh G900	Olympus Tough TG-4
Brand	Ricoh	Olympus
Announced	2018-02-21	2015-04-13
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	25
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	25-100 mm (4x)
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	F2.0-4.9
Macro Focus Range	1cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	1,040k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Digital only	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	5.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840x2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	247g	247g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	112 x 66 x 31mm
Battery Life	340 shots	380 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	Built-in
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction