Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh WG-6

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Fujifilm XP200

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing WG-6 and XP200, two Waterproof cameras from Ricoh and Fujifilm. Ricoh WG-6 was introduced to market in February 2018 and Fujifilm XP200 was launched in March 2013. As you can see, XP200 is 5 years older than WG-6. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

246g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Replaced Ricoh WG-5 GPS Compare

Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-03-22

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.9-4.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

3.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

360fps High-Speed Video

Built-in Wireless

232g. 116 x 71 x 30 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

10 Best-selling mirrorless cameras in Japan 2021
Flagship Mirrorless Camera Size Comparison
Fujifilm Released Firmware Updates for X-T4 and GFX100 Cameras
Fujifilm Black Friday Deals: GFX 50R $1500 off!
Samyang Releases the 12mm f/2 AF Lens for Fujifilm X-Mount
Pergear announces 10mm F5.6 fisheye lens that costs $89 only
Fujifilm Updated Roadmaps for X and G Mount Series Lenses
Fujifilm announces GFX 50S II and 35-70mm 4.5-5.6 WR

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh WG-6 over Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 16 MP	25% more pixels
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 920k dots	13% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Battery Life	340 shots vs 300 shots	40 more frames with a single charge
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Aperture - Wide	3.50 vs 3.90	faster lens at wide
Flash Coverage	5.5m vs 3.1m	2.4m longer range
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Reasons to choose Fujifilm FinePix XP200 over Ricoh WG-6

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Supports FlashAir SD cards	Better connectivity
In-built Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
Weight	232 g vs 246 g	14 g lighter
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.50	faster lens at tele

Common Strengths of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs Yes	shoot at tough conditions

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm FinePix XP200

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality

Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh WG-6 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 246 g (0.54 lb / 8.68 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XP200 has external dimensions of 116 x 71 x 30 mm (4.57 x 2.8 x 1.18″) and weighs 232 g (0.51 lb / 8.18 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200. Fujifilm XP200 is 2mm narrower and 3mm thinner than Ricoh WG-6 but it is also 5mm taller.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Fujifilm XP200 is 14g lighter than the Ricoh WG-6 but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Fujifilm XP200 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the WG-6 and XP200 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 Cameras

Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 have the same sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200 Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XP200 features a 28-140 mm F3.9-4.9 5× zoom lens.

Both cameras have a wide angle coverage of 28mm. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f3.50, Ricoh WG-6 is faster than Fujifilm XP200 at this focal length. Both cameras have a tele angle reach of 140mm. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Fujifilm XP200 is faster than Ricoh WG-6 at this focal length.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

WG-6

XP200

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh WG-6 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP200 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XP200 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.90
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP200 for Sports Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Environmental Sealings
Wireless Connection
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Unknown Focus Points
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XP200 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
246g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
232g
Environmental Sealings
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP200 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Environmental Sealings
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 vs Fujifilm XP200: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh WG-6 and Fujifilm XP200 scores compare:

Ricoh WG-6

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #72 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #525 out of 1236 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XP200

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #89 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #564 out of 1236 in all Cameras

Ricoh WG-6 has a higher Overall Score than the Fujifilm XP200 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Fujifilm XP200 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh WG-6	Fujifilm FinePix XP200
Brand	Ricoh	Fujifilm
Announced	2018-02-21	2013-03-22
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CMOS
Size	1/2.3"	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	28-140 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	F3.9-4.9
Macro Focus Range	1cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	1,040k dots	920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	3.10 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	3.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	246g	232g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	116 x 71 x 30mm
Battery Life	340 shots	300 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction