Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Olympus TG-2 iHS

12 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

Check price atAmazon›Check price atB&H›

Change

Samsung SL620

12 MP | 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) CCD Sensor

Check price atAmazon›Check price atB&H›

Olympus TG-2 iHS

See at Amazon

Samsung SL620

See at Amazon

Olympus TG-2 iHS

See at AMAZON

Samsung SL620

See at AMAZON

Cast your vote: Which camera would you choose?

Be the first one to vote these cameras!

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Olympus TG-2 iHS, which was introduced in June 2013 is a Waterproof camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Samsung SL620, which was introduced in February 2009 is a Ultracompact camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, SL620 is 4 years older than TG-2 iHS. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-06-28

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

5.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

240fps High-Speed Video

Built-in GPS

230g. 111 x 67 x 29 mm

Weather-sealed Body

Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2009-02-17

12MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 1600

35-175 mm F2.8-5.7 Zoom Lens

2.70" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

- 640 x 480 video resolution

168g. 92 x 61 x 23 mm

Also known as PL65

Let's read on in the following sections in order to better understand in detail how the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS over Samsung SL620

In-built Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
GPS	BuiltIn vs None	record your image locations
Max Native ISO	6.400 vs 1.600	300% higher Max Native ISO
LCD Screen Size	3 vs 2.7"	0.3 inches larger display
LCD Resolution	610k dots vs 230k dots	165% higher resolution screen
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	Extra protection against water and dust
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 35mm	10 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	2.00 vs 2.80	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.70	faster lens at tele
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480	Higher Resolution Video

Check price at AMAZON

Reasons to choose Samsung SL620 over Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS

Internal Storage	30 MB vs 22 MB	More built-in storage
Weight	168 g vs 230 g	62 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	175mm vs 100mm	75 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5.0x vs 4.0x	more flexible focal coverage

Check price at AMAZON

Common Strengths of Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	Easy focusing on portrait shots

Common Weaknesses of Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs Fixed Type	Screen tilts or Flips out independently, perfect for both stills and video
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Manual Focusing	No vs No	No manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure	No vs No	No manual exposure control

FEATURED ARTICLES

The Best Canon G7 X Mark III Alternatives in 2026

Introducing CAMDEC Snapshot: a free Lightroom plug..

Sony FX5 Cinema Line Camera to be announced July 2..

New4

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620: Physical Specs and Body Features Comparison

Size and weight are big decision factors when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, we are going to illustrate the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Olympus TG-2 iHS has external dimensions of 111 x 67 x 29 mm (4.37 x 2.64 x 1.14″) and weighs 230 g (0.51 lb / 8.11 oz) (including batteries). Samsung SL620 has external dimensions of 92 x 61 x 23 mm (3.62 x 2.4 x 0.91″) and weighs 168 g (0.37 lb / 5.93 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front-view size comparison of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and the Samsung SL620. Samsung SL620 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 19mm narrower, 6mm shorter and 6mm thinner than Olympus TG-2 iHS.

Comparison image of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and the Samsung SL620 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620.

Comparison image of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and the Samsung SL620 Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor, especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung SL620 is significantly lighter (62g ) than the Olympus TG-2 iHS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

With its weather-sealed body, we believe that the TG-2 iHS has a big advantage over the SL620 which doesn't provide any kind of environmental sealing.

LCD Screen Size and Features

Olympus TG-2 iHS's 3.00" LCD screen is slightly larger than Samsung SL620's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620: Sensor Comparison

Both Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 have 1/2.3-inch sized 12.0 MP resolution sensors so sensor size and resolution is not a differentiator between these two cameras.

Below you can see the TG-2 iHS and SL620 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 Cameras

Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 have almost the same sensor size, so neither of them has any significant advantage over the other in terms of providing control over depth of field when used with the same focal length and aperture.

Sensor size sets the circle of confusion, so it drives how much depth of field each of these bodies gives you at a given aperture. You can calculate it exactly for the Olympus TG-2 iHS or the Samsung SL620, including hyperfocal distance.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620 Lens Specs Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS features a 25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 4x zoom lens whereas Samsung SL620 features a 35-175 mm F2.8-5.7 5× zoom lens.

Olympus TG-2 iHS has 10mm wider coverage than the Samsung SL620. At f2.00, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Samsung SL620 has 75mm longer telezoom reach than the Olympus TG-2 iHS. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Olympus TG-2 iHS is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

TG-2 iHS

SL620

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Olympus TG-2 iHS for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung SL620 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Olympus TG-2 iHS for Street Photography

GOOD

Samsung SL620 for Street Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.00
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Olympus TG-2 iHS for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung SL620 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Environmental Sealings
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Unknown Focus Points
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
175 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details

Olympus TG-2 iHS for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung SL620 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
230g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
168g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Olympus TG-2 iHS for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung SL620 for Landscape Photography

POOR

25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Built-in GPS
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung SL620: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision regarding which camera best suits your needs and budget. However, if you're curious about how we rated the Olympus TG-2 iHS and the Samsung SL620, below you'll find their scores across five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung SL620 scores compare:

Olympus TG-2 iHS

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #205 out of 488 in Compact cameras
Ranked #856 out of 1384 in all Cameras

Samsung SL620

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #123 out of 156 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1303 out of 1384 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-2 iHS has a higher Overall Score than the Samsung SL620 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Olympus TG-2 iHS

Check price at AMAZON

Check price at B&H PHOTO

Samsung SL620

Check price at AMAZON

Check price at B&H PHOTO

General	Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS	Samsung SL620
Brand	Olympus	Samsung
Announced	2013-06-28	2009-02-17
Body Type	Compact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.08 x 4.56 mm
Area	28.07mm²	27.72mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	12 megapixels
Max Resolution	3968 x 2976	4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	100 ISO	80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	n/a	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	25-100 mm (4x)	35-175 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F2.0-4.9	F2.8-5.7
Macro Focus Range	1cm	5cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	2.70"
Resolution	610k dots	230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	n/a	4.60 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	5.0 fps	n/a
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	640 x 480
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	230g	168g
Dimensions	111 x 67 x 29mm	92 x 61 x 23mm
Battery Life	350 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction

Camera List

Lens List

Search & Add