The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD and the Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison
The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM is the longer of the two lenses at 94mm. The Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD with a length of 87mm, is 7mm shorter. On the other hand, the Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD has a larger diameter of 83mm compared to the Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM's 80mm diameter.
The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD weighs 440g, which means it is 205g (31%) lighter than the Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM which has a weight of 645g.
Lens Mounts
Both the Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD and the Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM has the same Canon EF lens mount. Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with the Canon EF lenses are Blackmagic URSA 12K LF, Z CAM E2-F6 II 6K and Z CAM E2-S6 II 6K.
Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD is also available in the Nikon F (FX) mount.
Focal Range
Tamron 17-35mm f2.8-4 LD has a focal range of 17-35mm and
2.1X zoom ratio . When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.6x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of
27.2 - 56mm.
On the other hand, the Canon 14mm f2.8L II USM is a prime lens with fixed focal lenght of 14mm. When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.6x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of 22.4mm.
