The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 is the longer of the two lenses at 122mm. The Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 with a length of 104mm, is 18mm shorter. Besides being longer, the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 also has a larger diameter of 81mm compared to the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8's 75mm diameter.
Below you can find a scaled side-by-side image of Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 and Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 to get a better idea of how their sizes compare in real life.
Comparison image of the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 Size and Weight The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 weighs 450g, 21% (125g) lighter than the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8's weight of 575g.
Filter Threads
Both the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 have the same Filter thread size of 67mm .
Below are links to the 67mm filters that we recommend you to consider for these lenses:
Lens Mounts
Both the Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 has the same Nikon Z lens mount . Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with the Nikon Z lenses are Nikon ZR , Nikon Z5 II and RED Komodo-X 6K Z .
Sony E mount.
Focal Range
Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 has a focal range of 35-100mm and
2.9X zoom ratio . When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.5x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of
52.5 - 150mm .
On the other hand, the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 has a focal range of 16-30mm and 1.9X zoom ratio . When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.5x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of 24 - 45mm .
