The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 is the longer of the two lenses at 104mm. The Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 with a length of 102mm, is 2mm shorter. On the other hand, there is no difference between the max diameters of these lenses, both coming at 75mm.
Below you can find a scaled side-by-side image of Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 and Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 to get a better idea of how their sizes compare in real life.
Comparison image of the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 Size and Weight The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 weighs 440g, 2% (10g) lighter than the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8's weight of 450g.
Filter Threads
Both the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 and the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 have the same Filter thread size of 67mm .
Below are links to the 67mm filters that we recommend you to consider for these lenses:
Lens Mounts
The Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 has the Nikon Z lens mount whereas the Tamron 16-30mm f2.8 has the Sony E lens mount . Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with these mounts are Nikon ZR , Nikon Z5 II and RED Komodo-X 6K Z for the Nikon Z Mount and Sony FX5 , Sony A7R VI and Sony A7 V for the Sony E Mount.
Nikon Z mount.
Focal Range
Both lenses have the same focal range of
16-30mm and the fastest aperture of
F2.8 .
