The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 and the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 is the longer of the two lenses at 118mm. The Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 with a length of 116mm, is 2mm shorter. On the other hand, there is no difference between the max diameters of these lenses, both coming at 77mm.
Below you can find a scaled side-by-side image of Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 and Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 to get a better idea of how their sizes compare in real life.
Comparison image of the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 and the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 Size and Weight The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 weighs 540g, 1% (10g) lighter than the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3's weight of 550g.
Filter Threads
Both the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 and the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 have the same Filter thread size of 72mm .
Below are links to the 72mm filters that we recommend you to consider for these lenses:
Lens Mounts
The Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 has the Leica L lens mount whereas the Sigma 20-200mm F3.5-6.3 has the Sony E lens mount . Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with these mounts are Leica SL3-P , Panasonic S1 II and Panasonic S1 IIE for the Leica L Mount and Sony FX5 , Sony A7R VI and Sony A7 V for the Sony E Mount.
Leica L mount.
Focal Range
Both lenses have the same focal range of
20-200mm and the fastest aperture of
F3.5-6.3 .
