Both Casio TRYX and Panasonic GF2 have 12.0 MP resolution sensors but Casio TRYX's sensor is 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) and Panasonic GF2's sensor is Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm ).
Since Panasonic GF2's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Casio TRYX.
Below you can see the TRYX and GF2 sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio TRYX and Panasonic GF2 Cameras
As seen above, Panasonic GF2 has a 8.0x Larger sensor area than Casio TRYX. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
Sensor size sets the circle of confusion, so it drives how much depth of field each
of these bodies gives you at a given aperture. You can calculate it exactly for the
Casio TRYX
or the
Panasonic GF2 ,
including hyperfocal distance.
One thing to watch when comparing these two: they have different sensor sizes
(1/2.3-inch versus Four Thirds),
so compare them at the same framing rather than the same focal length.
Put the same focal length on the smaller sensor and it will show less depth of
field, not more, because it also crops tighter. The calculator shows the
full frame equivalent focal length for each body so you can match the framing.
