Casio EX-ZR300 has a
16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Exilim Engine HS processor. On the other hand, Casio TRYX has a
12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Exilim Engine HS processor.
Below you can see the EX-ZR300 and TRYX sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio EX-ZR300 and Casio TRYX Cameras
Casio EX-ZR300 and Casio TRYX have the same sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Casio TRYX has 32% larger pixel area (2.34µm 2 vs 1.76µm 2 ) compared to Casio EX-ZR300, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.
Sensor size sets the circle of confusion, so it drives how much depth of field each
of these bodies gives you at a given aperture. You can calculate it exactly for the
Casio EX-ZR300
or the
Casio TRYX ,
including hyperfocal distance.
