The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH and the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison
The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM is the longer of the two lenses at 68mm. The Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH with a length of 34mm, is 34mm shorter. On the other hand, there is no difference between the max diameters of these lenses, both coming at 52mm.
The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH weighs 197g, which means it is 43g (17%) lighter than the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM which has a weight of 240g.
Filter Threads
The Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH has a filter size of 46mm whereas the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM has a 43mm diameter. Larger filters are generally more expensive than the smaller ones given all the other features are equal.
Below are links to the 46mm filters that we recommend you to consider for the Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH:
And these are the 43mm filters that we recommend for the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM:
Lens Mounts
Both the Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH and the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM has the same Leica M lens mount. Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with the Leica M lenses are Leica M11 Monochrome, Leica M11 and Leica M10.
Focal Range
Both lenses have the same focal range of
35mm but while Leica Summarit-M 35mm F2.4 ASPH has the fastest aperture of
F2.4, the Carl Zeiss Biogon T2/35 ZM's widest aperture value is
F2.0.