The type of photography that you are planning to use is an important decision factor. Here we have evaluated the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED for their suitability to various photography scenarios:
Size and Weight Comparison
The size of a lens is a crucial factor to consider when comparing two lenses. Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED is the longer of the two lenses at 132mm. The Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM with a length of 127mm, is 5mm shorter. Besides being longer, the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED also has a larger diameter of 98mm compared to the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM's 89mm diameter.
The weight of a lens is equally significant as its external dimensions, particularly if you intend to handhold your camera and lens combination for extended periods. Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM weighs 840g, which means it is 130g (13%) lighter than the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED which has a weight of 970g.
Lens Mounts
The Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM has the Canon RF lens mount whereas the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED has the Nikon F (FX) lens mount. Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with these mounts are Canon R100, Canon R8 and Canon R50 for the Canon RF Mount and Nikon D6, Nikon D780 and Nikon D3500 for the Nikon F (FX) Mount.
Focal Range
Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM has a focal range of 15-35mm and
2.3X zoom ratio . When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.6x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of
24 - 56mm.
On the other hand, the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED has a focal range of 14-24mm and 1.7X zoom ratio . When it is mounted on an APS-C sensor camera with 1.5x crop, it provides a 35mm (FF) equivalent of 21 - 36mm.