CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Sony W320

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

Sony W320
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Canon ELPH 340 HS

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

Canon ELPH 340 HS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing W320 and ELPH 340 HS, two Ultracompact cameras from Sony and Canon. Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Sony W320 has a 14.0 MP and Canon ELPH 340 HS has a 16.0 MP resolution. Sony W320 was introduced to market in January 2010 and Canon ELPH 340 HS was launched in January 2014. As you can see, W320 is 4 years older than ELPH 340 HS. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Sony W320 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2010-01-07
  • 14MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 26-105 mm F2.7-5.7 Zoom Lens
  • 2.7" Fixed Type Screen
  • 1 fps continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 117g. 93 x 52 x 17 mm

Canon ELPH 340 HS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-01-06
  • 16MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 25-300 mm F3.6-7.0 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 4 fps continuous shooting
  • HD - 1920 x 1280 video resolution
  • 240fps High-Speed Video
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 147g. 100 x 58 x 22 mm
  • Also known as IXUS 265 HS

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 over Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
Weight
117 g vs 147 g 30 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
2.70 vs 3.60 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
5.70 vs 7.00 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
2.01µm2 vs 1.76µm2 14% larger pixel area


Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS over Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 14 MP 14% more pixels
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
461k dots vs 230k dots 100% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/2000s vs 1/1600s faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting
4.0fps vs 1.0fps 3 fps faster
Focal Length - Wide
25mm vs 26mm 1 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
300mm vs 105mm 195 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
12× vs 4× more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1280 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
NFC Connection
Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices

Common Strengths of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 and Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Common Weaknesses of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 and Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support
No vs No Lower image quality
LCD Screen Resolution
230k dots vs 461k dots Low resolution screens
Manual Exposure
No vs No No manual exposure control
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Max Aperture - Tele
5.70 vs 7.00 Slow lenses at tele
Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Sony W320 has external dimensions of 93 x 52 x 17 mm (3.66 x 2.05 x 0.67″) and weighs 117 g (0.26 lb / 4.13 oz) (including batteries). Canon ELPH 340 HS has external dimensions of 100 x 58 x 22 mm (3.93 x 2.27 x 0.88″) and weighs 147 g (0.32 lb / 5.19 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS. Sony W320 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 7mm narrower, 6mm shorter and 5mm thinner than Canon ELPH 340 HS.

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS.

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Sony W320 is significantly lighter (30g ) than the Canon ELPH 340 HS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 nor Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS (IXUS 265 HS) provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Canon ELPH 340 HS's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Sony W320's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS: Sensor Comparison

Sony W320 has a 14.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Canon ELPH 340 HS has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features DIGIC 4+ processor.

Below you can see the W320 and ELPH 340 HS sensor size comparison.

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS Cameras


Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Sony W320 has 14% larger pixel area compared to Canon ELPH 340 HS, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS Lens Specs Comparison

Sony W320 features a 26-105 mm F2.7-5.7 4× zoom lens whereas Canon ELPH 340 HS features a 25-300 mm F3.6-7.0 12× zoom lens.

Canon ELPH 340 HS has 1mm wider coverage than the Sony W320. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f2.70, Sony W320 is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Canon ELPH 340 HS has 195mm longer telezoom reach than the Sony W320. However, with a max aperture of f5.70, Sony W320 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

W320
ELPH 340 HS
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Sony W320 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Canon ELPH 340 HS for Portrait Photography

POOR
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Sony W320 for Street Photography

POOR

Canon ELPH 340 HS for Street Photography

GOOD
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.70
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.60
Read the details

Sony W320 for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon ELPH 340 HS for Sports Photography

POOR
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1600s
9 Focus Points
105 mm Tele Lens
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Wireless Connection
300 mm Tele Lens
Average Continuous Shooting: 4.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 190 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f7.00
Read the details

Sony W320 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Canon ELPH 340 HS for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
117g
Body Thickness 17mm
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
Compact Body
147g
Body Thickness 22mm
12.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Sony W320 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Canon ELPH 340 HS for Landscape Photography

POOR
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Sony W320 vs Canon ELPH 340 HS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Sony W320 and Canon ELPH 340 HS scores compare:

Sony W320
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #115 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1125 out of 1226 in all Cameras
Canon ELPH 340 HS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #14 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #709 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Canon ELPH 340 HS is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Sony W320 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Sony W320. Otherwise, Canon ELPH 340 HS is the better camera overall.

Sony W320
Sony W320
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon ELPH 340 HS
Canon ELPH 340 HS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon ELPH 340 HS vs Sony W320 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 Canon PowerShot ELPH 340 HS
Brand Sony Canon
Announced 2010-01-07 2014-01-06
Body Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor
Type CCD CMOS
Size 1/2.3-inch 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 14 megapixels 16 megapixels
Max Resolution 4320 x 3240 4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity 3,200 ISO 3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 26-105 mm (4×) 25-300 mm (12×)
Max Aperture F2.7-5.7 F3.6-7.0
Macro Focus Range 4cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 2.7" 3"
Resolution 230k dots 461k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1600s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 4.80 m 4.00 m
Max Flash Sync s n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 1.0 fps 4.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 1920 x 1280
Video Formats Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 117g 147g
Dimensions 93 x 52 x 17mm 100 x 58 x 22mm
Battery Life n/a 190 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Pentax K-m
10 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Pentax K-3 III
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Sigma fp L
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction