Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Sony T900

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Fujifilm XQ2

12 MP | 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing T900 and XQ2, two Ultracompact cameras from Sony and Fujifilm. Sony T900 was introduced to market in February 2009 and Fujifilm XQ2 was launched in January 2015. As you can see, T900 is 6 years older than XQ2. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Sony T900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2009-02-17

12MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

35-140 mm F3.5-10.0 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3.50" Fixed Type Screen

2.0fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

143g. 98 x 58 x 16 mm

Fujifilm XQ2 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2015-01-14

12MP - 2/3' CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

ISO 100 - 12800

25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

12.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

206g. 100 x 59 x 33 mm

Replaced Fujifilm XQ1 Compare

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

New Insta360 One RS 1-Inch 360-Degree Camera Shoots 6K Video and 21MP Stills
Sony FE 100-400 E vs Canon 100-500 RF vs Nikon Z 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-400 Lens Size Comparison
Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-55 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-80 F4 vs Fujifilm 18-55 F2.8-4 Lens Size and Specs Comparison
Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Released for Fujifilm X Mount
Fujifilm G and X Mount Camera and Lens Deals - Save up to $2000
Sony A1 Firmware Update Brings 8K 4:2:2 10-bit Video and Lossless Compressed Raw Stills
Todays Deals: Samyang 12mm F2 for $399, Bolt Flashes for $49 and more
Cameras with Stacked Sensors and No Blackout Viewfinders in 2022

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 over Fujifilm XQ2

Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
LCD Screen Size	3.5" vs 3"	0.5 inches larger display
Weight	143 g vs 206 g	63 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	140mm vs 100mm	40 mm longer tele reach

CHECK T900 PRICE

Reasons to choose Fujifilm XQ2 over Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs None	Better connectivity
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max ISO	12.800 vs 3.200	300% higher Max ISO
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/1000s	faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting	12.0fps vs 2.0fps	10 fps faster
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 35mm	10 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 10.00	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	7.4m vs 2.9m	4.5m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	4.84µm² vs 2.34µm²	106% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

CHECK XQ2 PRICE

Common Strengths of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Fujifilm XQ2

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Optical	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 920k dots	High resolution screens
Manual Focusing	Yes vs Yes	both have manual focusing modes

Common Weaknesses of Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 and Fujifilm XQ2

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Sony T900 has external dimensions of 98 x 58 x 16 mm (3.86 x 2.28 x 0.63″) and weighs 143 g (0.32 lb / 5.04 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XQ2 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 33 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.3″) and weighs 206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2. Sony T900 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 2mm narrower, 1mm shorter and 17mm thinner than Fujifilm XQ2.

Comparison image of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2.

Comparison image of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Sony T900 is significantly lighter (63g ) than the Fujifilm XQ2 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 nor Fujifilm XQ2 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Sony T900's 3.50" LCD screen is slightly larger than Fujifilm XQ2's 3" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2: Sensor Comparison

Both Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 have 12.0 MP resolution sensors but Sony T900's sensor is 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) and Fujifilm XQ2's sensor is 2/3' (8.8 x 6.6 mm ).

Since Fujifilm XQ2's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Sony T900.

Below you can see the T900 and XQ2 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 Cameras

As seen above, Fujifilm XQ2 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Sony T900. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2 Lens Specs Comparison

Sony T900 features a 35-140 mm F3.5-10.0 4× zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XQ2 features a 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4× zoom lens.

Fujifilm XQ2 has 10mm wider coverage than the Sony T900. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Sony T900 has 40mm longer reach than the Fujifilm XQ2. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Fujifilm XQ2 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

T900

XQ2

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Sony T900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Sony T900 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XQ2 for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Sony T900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1000s
9 Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f10.00
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Sony T900 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XQ2 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
143g
Body Thickness 16mm
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
206g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
Read the details

Sony T900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ2 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Sony T900 vs Fujifilm XQ2: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Sony T900 and Fujifilm XQ2 scores compare:

Sony T900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #33 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #896 out of 1244 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ2

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #3 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #465 out of 1244 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ2 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Sony T900 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Sony T900. Otherwise, Fujifilm XQ2 is the better camera overall.

Fujifilm XQ2 vs Sony T900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900	Fujifilm XQ2
Brand	Sony	Fujifilm
Announced	2009-02-17	2015-01-14
Body Type	Ultracompact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	CCD	CMOS X-TRANS II
Size	1/2.3-inch	2/3'
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	8.8 x 6.6 mm
Area	28.07mm²	58.08mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	12 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	80 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	35-140 mm (4×)	25-100 mm (4×)
Max Aperture	F3.5-10.0	F1.8-4.9
Macro Focus Range	n/a	3cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.50"	3.00"
Resolution	922k dots	920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/1000s	1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Optical	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	2.90 m (Auto ISO)	7.40 m (at Auto ISO)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	2.0 fps	12.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1280 x 720	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	Motion JPEG	H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	143g	206g
Dimensions	98 x 58 x 16mm	100 x 59 x 33mm
Battery Life	n/a	240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction