CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Sony A7S

12 MP | Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) CMOS Sensor

Sony A7S
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

12 MP | APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Mirrorless cameras from Sony and Ricoh. Sony A7S was introduced to market in April 2014 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro was launched in November 2009. As you can see, GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 5 years older than A7S. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Both cameras have 12.0MP sensors but Sony A7S's sensor is Full frame sized whereas Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has a APS-C sensor.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Sony A7S Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-04-06
  • 12MP - Full frame CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 409600
  • Sony E Mount
  • 3 Tilting Screen
  • 2359k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 5 fps continuous shooting
  • 4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution
  • 120 fps High-Speed Video
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 489g. 127 x 94 x 48 mm
  • Weather Sealed Body

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-11-10
  • 12MP - APS-C CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 50 mm F2.5 Zoom Lens
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 3 fps continuous shooting
  • HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution
  • 453g. 114 x 70 x 77 mm

Sony A7S was replaced by Sony Alpha 7S II. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Sony Alpha 7S II vs Sony Alpha A7S
Sony Alpha 7S II vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Sony Alpha A7S over Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
LCD Screen
Tilting vs Fixed Type Flexible shooting positions
Viewfinder
Electronic vs Electronic (Optional) Better framing and control
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max ISO
409.600 vs 3.200 12700% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution
1.230k dots vs 920k dots 33% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/8000s vs 1/3200s faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting
5.0fps vs 3.0fps 2 fps faster
Battery Life
360 shots vs 320 shots 40 more frames with a single charge
Microphone Port
Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Headphone Port
Yes vs No better video control
Environmental Sealing
Yes vs No shoot at tough conditions
Sensor Pixel Area
71.24µm2 vs 30.35µm2 134% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution
3840 x 2160 vs 1280 x 720 Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
NFC Connection
Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone


Reasons to choose Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over Sony Alpha A7S
Built-in Flash
Yes vs No Useful in low-light
Weight
453 g vs 489 g 36 g lighter
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs With optional app creative shooting

Common Strengths of Sony Alpha A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs Yes Better for flash photography
RAW Support
Yes vs Yes Better image quality
Common Weaknesses of Sony Alpha A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
In-body Image Stabilization
No vs No No Built-in stabilization
Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Sony A7S has external dimensions of 127 x 94 x 48 mm (5 x 3.7 x 1.89″) and weighs 489 g (1.08 lb / 17.25 oz) (including batteries). Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has external dimensions of 114 x 70 x 77 mm (4.49 x 2.76 x 3.03″) and weighs 453 g (1.00 lb / 15.98 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 13mm narrower and 24mm shorter than Sony A7S but it is also 29mm thicker. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has a built-in lens but Sony A7S doesn't. Once you put a lens on A7S, its thickness will increase significantly.

Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 36g lighter than the Sony A7S but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on A7S, the total kit will weigh much higher.

Weather Sealing

With its weather sealed body, we believe that A7S has a big advantage over GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which doesn't provide any kind of environmental sealing.

LCD Screen Size and Features

Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.

On the other hand, Sony A7S features a Tilting screen where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels whereas the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to A7S.
Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro: Sensor Comparison

Both Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro have 12.0 MP resolution sensors but Sony A7S's sensor is Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm ) and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro's sensor is APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm ).

Since Sony A7S's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Below you can see the A7S and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro sensor size comparison.

Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Cameras


As seen above, Sony A7S has a 2.3x Larger sensor area than Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

What types of Photography are Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Sony A7S for Portrait Photography

GOOD

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) sensor
External Flash Shoe
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details

Sony A7S for Street Photography

GOOD

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for Street Photography

AVERAGE
Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.50
Optional External Viewfinder
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
No Live-view
50 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Sony A7S for Sports Photography

GOOD

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for Sports Photography

AVERAGE
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/8000s
25 Focus Points
Good Low Light ISO
Wireless Connection
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
External Flash Shoe
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Average Max shutter speed: 1/3200s
No Image Stabilization
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
50 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Sony A7S for Daily Photography

EXCELLENT

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
Environmental Sealings
Medium size Body
489g
Body Thickness 48mm
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Medium size Body
453g
Body Thickness 77mm
Read the details

Sony A7S for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro for Landscape Photography

POOR
Large Full frame (35.8 x 23.9 mm) sensor
Environmental Sealings
Live-view
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.6 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
50 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Sony A7S vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Sony A7S and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro scores compare:

Sony A7S
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #39 out of 86 in SLR-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked #71 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #117 out of 126 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked #514 out of 1220 in all Cameras

Sony A7S has a higher Overall Score than the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Sony A7S
Sony A7S
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro vs Sony A7S Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sony Alpha A7S Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
Brand Sony Ricoh
Announced 2014-04-06 2009-11-10
Body Type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Type CMOS CMOS
Size Full frame APS-C
Dimensions 35.8 x 23.9 mm 23.6 x 15.7 mm
Area 855.62mm2 370.52mm2
Megapixels 12 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 4240 x 2832 4288 x 2848
Max Native Light sensitivity 409,600 ISO 3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 200 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 25 n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount Sony E fixed lens
Lens Focal Range no lens 50 mm (1×)
Max Aperture no lens F2.5
Macro Focus Range no lens 1cm
Screen
Type Tilting Fixed type
Size 3 3"
Resolution 1,230k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder Resolution 2,359k dots no electronic viewfinder
Viewfinder Coverage 100% n/a
Viewfinder Magnification 0.71x n/a
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/8000s 1/3200s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Max Flash Sync n/a s
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 5.0 fps 3.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 1280 x 720
Video Formats MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Built-In None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 489g 453g
Dimensions 127 x 94 x 48mm 114 x 70 x 77mm
Battery Life 360 shots 320 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording With Downloadable App
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score 87 not tested
DxO Color Depth 23.9 not tested
DxO Dynamic Range 13.2 not tested
DxO Low Light ISO 3702 not tested
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Mirrorless Cameras
Top Mirrorless Cameras Under $500
Top Mirrorless Cameras Under $750
Top Mirrorless Cameras Under $1000
Top Mirrorless Cameras Under $1500
Latest Cameras
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Sony A7c
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Panasonic S5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Copyright © 2020 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction