CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Sigma DP2 Quattro

20 MP | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor

Sigma DP2 Quattro
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Canon SX40 HS

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Canon SX40 HS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Sigma DP2 Quattro, which was introduced in February 2014 is a Large Sensor Compact camera with a 20.0MP APS-C sensor whereas Canon SX40 HS, which was introduced in September 2011 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, SX40 HS is 3 years older than DP2 Quattro. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-02-13
  • 20MP - APS-C CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 45 mm f2.80 Prime Lens
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 3 fps continuous shooting
  • No Video Mode
  • 395g. 161 x 67 x 82 mm

Canon SX40 HS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2011-09-15
  • 12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 24-840 mm F2.7-5.8 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 2.7" Fully Articulated Screen
  • Electronic viewfinder
  • 10 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 240fps High-Speed Video
  • 600g. 123 x 92 x 108 mm
  • Replaced Canon PowerShot SX30 IS Compare

Canon SX40 HS was replaced by Canon PowerShot SX50 HS. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Sigma DP2 Quattro over Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Max Sensor Resolution
20 MP vs 12 MP 66% more pixels
Max ISO
6.400 vs 3.200 100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
920k dots vs 230k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Weight
395 g vs 600 g 205 g lighter
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Max Aperture - Tele
2.80 vs 5.80 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
18.81µm2 vs 2.34µm2 703% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR


Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot SX40 HS over Sigma DP2 Quattro
Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
LCD Screen
Fully Articulated vs Fixed Type Flexible shooting positions
Built-in Flash
Yes vs No Useful in low-light
Viewfinder
Electronic vs None Better framing and control
Max Mech. Shutter
1/3200s vs 1/2000s faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting
10.0fps vs 3.0fps 7 fps faster
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 45mm 21 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
840mm vs 45mm 795 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
35× vs 1× more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
2.70 vs 2.80 faster lens at wide
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs None Higher Resolution Video
Selfie & Vlogger Friendly LCD
Yes vs No Rotate LCD for taking Selfies

Common Strengths of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs Yes Better for flash photography
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs Yes very handy for portraits
Manual Focusing
Yes vs Yes both have manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Common Weaknesses of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" Small display
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Sigma DP2 Quattro has external dimensions of 161 x 67 x 82 mm (6.34 x 2.64 x 3.23″) and weighs 395 g (0.87 lb / 13.93 oz) (including batteries). Canon SX40 HS has external dimensions of 123 x 92 x 108 mm (4.84 x 3.62 x 4.25″) and weighs 600 g (1.32 lb / 21.16 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS. Sigma DP2 Quattro is 25mm shorter and 26mm thinner than Canon SX40 HS but it is also 38mm wider.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS.
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Sigma DP2 Quattro is significantly lighter (205g ) than the Canon SX40 HS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Bridge Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Bridge Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Sigma DP2 Quattro nor Canon PowerShot SX40 HS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
Top Bridge Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Sigma DP2 Quattro's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Canon SX40 HS's 2.7" screen.

On the other hand, Canon SX40 HS sports a Fully Articulated screen which you can change the angle and position of the screen almost freely, making it possible to shoot from waist or over the head levels, and especially very useful for shooting selfies and video. On the other hand, Sigma DP2 Quattro has a fixed type screen which provides almost no flexibility in shooting positions compared to SX40 HS.
Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS: Sensor Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro has a 20.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS (Foveon X3) sensor and features TRUE III engine processor. On the other hand, Canon SX40 HS has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor .

Sigma DP2 Quattro's sensor provides 8MP more than Canon SX40 HS's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the DP2 Quattro and SX40 HS sensor size comparison.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS Cameras


As seen above, Sigma DP2 Quattro has a 13.1x Larger sensor area than Canon SX40 HS. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS Lens Specs Comparison

Sigma DP2 Quattro features a 45 mm F2.8 Prime lens whereas Canon SX40 HS features a 24-840 mm F2.7-5.8 35× zoom lens.

It is not easy to compare a prime lens with a zoom lens. Canon SX40 HS's zoom lens provides a great flexibility compared to Sigma DP2 Quattro's 45mm fixed focal length lens. On the other hand, DP2 Quattro's prime lens makes it a specialized camera. You compromise the flexibility of a zoom in order to enjoy the high image quality and unique rendering of this fast lens. On the tele end, Canon SX40 HS has 795mm longer telezoom reach than the Sigma DP2 Quattro. However, with a max aperture of f2.80, Sigma DP2 Quattro is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Widest - Canon G1 X II
Average
Telezoom

DSLR-Like Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Longest - Panasonic ZS200
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

DSLR-Like Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Fastest - Leica Q
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

DSLR-Like Cameras

DP2 Quattro
SX40 HS
Fastest - Panasonic LX10
Average
What types of Photography are Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Canon SX40 HS for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Canon SX40 HS for Street Photography

GOOD
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
45 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fully Articulated LCD Screen
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.70
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Medium sized Body
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon SX40 HS for Sports Photography

AVERAGE
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
45 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Image Stabilization
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 10.0fps
840 mm Tele Lens
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Average Max shutter speed: 1/3200s
No RAW shooting capability
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.80
Read the details

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Daily Photography

GOOD

Canon SX40 HS for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
395g
Body Thickness 82mm
Read the details
35.0X Optical Zoom
Medium size Body
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
600g
Body Thickness 108mm
Read the details

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE

Canon SX40 HS for Landscape Photography

POOR
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
45 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Canon SX40 HS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Sigma DP2 Quattro and Canon SX40 HS scores compare:

Sigma DP2 Quattro
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #45 out of 61 in Large sensor compact cameras
Ranked #466 out of 1223 in all Cameras
Canon SX40 HS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #46 out of 113 in SLR-like (bridge) cameras
Ranked #529 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Sigma DP2 Quattro scores higher than the Canon SX40 HS thanks to its better general imaging quality, compact size and higher value for the money. On the other hand, Canon SX40 HS has some extra features which may become a game changer if you have some specific requirements.
We recommend you to read our detailed Pro's and Con's section and see if any Pro of Canon SX40 HS is a must-have for you. If not, choose the Sigma DP2 Quattro.

Sigma DP2 Quattro
Sigma DP2 Quattro
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon SX40 HS
Canon SX40 HS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon SX40 HS vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sigma DP2 Quattro Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Brand Sigma Canon
Announced 2014-02-13 2011-09-15
Body Type Large sensor compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor
Type CMOS (Foveon X3) BSI-CMOS
Size APS-C 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 23.5 x 15.7 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 368.95mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 5424 x 3616 4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity 6,400 ISO 3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 45 mm (1×) 24-840 mm (35×)
Max Aperture F2.8 F2.7-5.8
Macro Focus Range n/a 0cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fully Articulated
Size 3" 2.7"
Resolution 920k dots 230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None Electronic
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/3200s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range no built-in flash 7.00 m
Max Flash Sync n/a 1/2000s
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 3.0 fps 10.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution None 1920 x 1080
Video Formats n/a MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Eye-Fi Connected
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 395g 600g
Dimensions 161 x 67 x 82mm 123 x 92 x 108mm
Battery Life n/a 380 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Compact Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Top Rated Bridge Cameras
Top Bridge Cameras Under $200
Top Bridge Cameras Under $500
Top Bridge Cameras Under $750
Top Bridge Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction