CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
    • All Cameras
    • Cameras by Brand
      • Sony Cameras
      • Canon Cameras
      • Nikon Cameras
      • Pentax Cameras
      • Fujifilm Cameras
      • Olympus Cameras
      • Panasonic Cameras
      • Leica Cameras
      • Samsung Cameras
    • Cameras by Body Type
      • Mirrorless Cameras
      • DSLR Cameras
      • Compact Cameras
      • Bridge Cameras
      • Waterproof Cameras
  • LENSES
    • All Lenses
    • Lenses by Mount
      • Sony E Mount Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF M Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF S Mount Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Lenses
      • Pentax KAF Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm G Mount Lenses
      • Sigma SA Mount Lenses
      • Sony Alpha Mount Lenses
    • Teleconverters
  • TOOLS
    • Cameras
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Lenses
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
  • BLOG

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Sigma DP1

5 MP | APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm) CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor

Sigma DP1
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Leica D-Lux Typ 109

13 MP | Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) CMOS Sensor

Leica D-Lux Typ 109
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing DP1 and D-Lux Typ 109, two Large Sensor Compact cameras from Sigma and Leica. Sigma DP1 was introduced to market in May 2008 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 was launched in September 2014. As you can see, DP1 is 6 years older than D-Lux Typ 109. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Sigma DP1 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2008-05-19
  • 5MP - APS-C CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 800
  • 28 mm f Prime Lens
  • 2.50" Fixed Type Screen
  • fps continuous shooting
  • No Video Mode
  • 270g. 113 x 60 x 50 mm

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-09-23
  • 13MP - Four Thirds CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 200 - 25600 ( expands to 100)
  • 24-75 mm F1.7-2.8 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • 2760k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 11.0fps continuous shooting
  • 4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 405g. 118 x 66 x 55 mm
  • Also known as Typ 109

Sigma DP1 was replaced by Sigma DP1s. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Sigma DP1s vs Sigma DP1
Sigma DP1s vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 was replaced by Leica D-Lux 7. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Leica D-Lux 7 vs Sigma DP1

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.


Related Blog Posts

Sony FE 100-400 E vs Canon 100-500 RF vs Nikon Z 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-400 Lens Size Comparison
Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-55 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-80 F4 vs Fujifilm 18-55 F2.8-4 Lens Size and Specs Comparison
Todays Deals: Samyang 12mm F2 for $399, Bolt Flashes for $49 and more
Cameras with Stacked Sensors and No Blackout Viewfinders in 2022
Todays Deals: Tripod, Microphone and more
New Sony E 10-20mm F4 PZ G vs Sony 16-35mm F4 PZ G Power Zoom Lens Comparison: APS-C is alive!
Review: SmallRig AD-01 Heavy-Duty Tripod with Fluid Head
Most Popular Canon EOS R7 and R10 Comparisons at Camera Decision


**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Sigma DP1 over Leica D-Lux
Built-in Flash
Yes vs No Useful in low-light
Weight
270 g vs 405 g 135 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
vs 1.70 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
vs 2.80 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
61.43µm2 vs 17.71µm2 246% larger pixel area
CHECK DP1 PRICE


Reasons to choose Leica D-Lux over Sigma DP1
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
In-built Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
Viewfinder
Electronic vs None Better framing and control
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
13 MP vs 5 MP 160% more pixels
Max ISO
25.600 vs 800 3100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3 vs 2.5" 0.5 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
921k dots vs 230k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 28mm 4 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
75mm vs 28mm 47 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
3.1× vs 1× more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution
3840 x 2160 vs None Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
NFC Connection
Yes vs No Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone
UHS Card Support
UHS-I vs none Read/Write in High Speeds
CHECK D-Lux Typ 109 PRICE

Common Strengths of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs Yes Better for flash photography
RAW Support
Yes vs Yes Better image quality
Continuous Shooting
fps vs 11.0fps Fast shooting speeds
Manual Focusing
Yes vs Yes both have manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Max Aperture - Wide
vs 1.70 Fast lenses at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
vs 2.80 Fast lenses at tele
Common Weaknesses of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Sigma DP1 has external dimensions of 113 x 60 x 50 mm (4.45 x 2.36 x 1.97″) and weighs 270 g (0.60 lb / 9.52 oz) (including batteries). Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 55 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 2.17″) and weighs 405 g (0.89 lb / 14.29 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109. Sigma DP1 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 5mm narrower, 6mm shorter and 5mm thinner than Leica D-Lux Typ 109.

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109.

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109.
Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Sigma DP1 is significantly lighter (135g ) than the Leica D-Lux Typ 109 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Sigma DP1 nor Leica D-Lux Typ 109 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Leica D-Lux Typ 109's 3.00" LCD screen is slightly larger than Sigma DP1's 2.5" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109: Sensor Comparison

Sigma DP1 has a 5.0MP APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm ) sized CMOS (Foveon X3) sensor . On the other hand, Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has a 13.0MP Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .

Leica D-Lux Typ 109's sensor provides 8MP more than Sigma DP1's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the DP1 and D-Lux Typ 109 sensor size comparison.

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Cameras


As seen above, Sigma DP1 has a 1.3x Larger sensor area than Leica D-Lux Typ 109. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Lens Specs Comparison

Sigma DP1 features a 28 mm Prime lens whereas Leica D-Lux Typ 109 features a 24-75 mm F1.7-2.8 3.1× zoom lens.

It is not easy to compare a prime lens with a zoom lens. Leica D-Lux Typ 109's zoom lens provides a great flexibility compared to Sigma DP1's 28mm fixed focal length lens. On the other hand, DP1's prime lens makes it a specialized camera. You compromise the flexibility of a zoom in order to enjoy the high image quality and unique rendering of this fast lens. On the tele end, Leica D-Lux Typ 109 has 47mm longer telezoom reach than the Sigma DP1. However, with a max aperture of f, Sigma DP1 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Widest - Canon G1 X II
Average
Telezoom

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Longest - Panasonic ZS200
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Fastest - Leica X (Typ 113)
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

DP1
D-Lux Typ 109
Fastest - Panasonic LX10
Average
What types of Photography are Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Sigma DP1 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Large APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 5.0MP
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 13.0MP
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Sigma DP1 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for Street Photography

EXCELLENT
Large APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.70
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Sigma DP1 for Sports Photography

POOR

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for Sports Photography

AVERAGE
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
28 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 11.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
49 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
75 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Sigma DP1 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for Daily Photography

GOOD
Large APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
270g
Body Thickness 50mm
Read the details
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
405g
Body Thickness 55mm
3.1X Optical Zoom
Read the details

Sigma DP1 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 for Landscape Photography

POOR
Large APS-C (20.7 x 13.8 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 5.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Large Four Thirds (17.3 x 13 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 13.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Sigma DP1 vs Leica D-Lux Typ 109: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Sigma DP1 and Leica D-Lux Typ 109 scores compare:

Sigma DP1
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #59 out of 61 in Large sensor compact cameras
Ranked #740 out of 1243 in all Cameras
Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #25 out of 61 in Large sensor compact cameras
Ranked #248 out of 1243 in all Cameras

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Sigma DP1 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Sigma DP1. Otherwise, Leica D-Lux Typ 109 is the better camera overall.

Sigma DP1
Sigma DP1
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Leica D-Lux Typ 109
Leica D-Lux Typ 109
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Leica D-Lux Typ 109 vs Sigma DP1 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Sigma DP1 Leica D-Lux
Brand Sigma Leica
Announced 2008-05-19 2014-09-23
Body Type Large sensor compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Type CMOS (Foveon X3) CMOS
Size APS-C Four Thirds
Dimensions 20.7 x 13.8 mm 17.3 x 13 mm
Area 285.66mm2 224.90mm2
Megapixels 5 megapixels 13 megapixels
Max Resolution 2640 x 1760 4112 x 3088
Max Native Light sensitivity 800 ISO 25,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 200 ISO
Min Boosted Light Sensitivity - 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a 49
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 28 mm (1×) 24-75 mm (3.1×)
Max Aperture no lens F1.7-2.8
Macro Focus Range n/a 3cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 2.50" 3.00"
Resolution 230k dots 921k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution no electronic viewfinder 2,760k dots
Viewfinder Coverage n/a 100%
Viewfinder Magnification n/a 0.7x
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/4000s 1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization No Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range n/a 7.00 m (with included external flash at ISO 100)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting n/a 11.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution None 3840 x 2160
Video Formats n/a MPEG-4
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 270g 405g
Dimensions 113 x 60 x 50mm 118 x 66 x 55mm
Battery Life n/a 300 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Sony A7 IV
33 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7R IV
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Nikon Z9
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Canon R3
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-T30 II
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Fujifilm X-H2S
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R7
33 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon R10
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Ricoh WG-80
16 MP | 1/2.3 Sensor | 28-140 mm
Panasonic GH6
25 MP | Four Thirds Sensor | Micro Four Thirds Mount
OM System OM-1
20 MP | Four Thirds Sensor | Micro Four Thirds Mount
Canon R5 C
45 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony HX99
18 MP | 1/2.3-inch Sensor | 24-720 mm
Copyright © 2022 by CameraDecision
Privacy About Contact Us SpeakerDecision

Report a Correction