Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Samsung WB850F has external dimensions of and weighs 250 g (0.55 lb / 8.82 oz) (including batteries). Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external dimensions of 113 x 65 x 48 mm (4.45 x 2.56 x 1.89″) and weighs 346 g (0.76 lb / 12.20 oz) (including batteries).
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. Samsung WB850F is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 4mm narrower, 3mm shorter and 23mm thinner than Olympus XZ-2 iHS.
![Samsung WB850F vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Camera Size Comparison - Front View]()
Comparison image of Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View
Now lets look at the top view comparison of Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS.
![Samsung WB850F vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Camera Size Comparison - Top View]()
Top View Comparison image of Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Size
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Samsung WB850F is significantly lighter (96g ) than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.
Weather Sealing
Unfortunately neither Samsung WB850F nor Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections: Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
LCD Screen Size and Features
Samsung WB850F and Olympus XZ-2 iHS's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".
On the other hand, Olympus XZ-2 iHS features a
Tilting screen where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels whereas the Samsung WB850F has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to XZ-2 iHS.