Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Samsung ST6500 has external dimensions of 102 x 57 x 19 mm (4.02 x 2.24 x 0.75″) and weighs (including batteries). Fujifilm XQ1 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 33 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.3″) and weighs 206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz) (including batteries).
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1. Samsung ST6500 is 2mm shorter and 14mm thinner than Fujifilm XQ1 but it is also 2mm wider.
Comparison image of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View
Here is the back view size comparison of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1.
Comparison image of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size and Weight - Back View
Now lets look at the top view comparison of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1.
Top View Comparison image of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Samsung ST6500 is 206g lighter than the Fujifilm XQ1 but we don't think this will make a significant difference.
Weight Comparison
Compact Cameras
Thickness Comparison
Compact Cameras
Weather Sealing
Unfortunately neither Samsung ST6500 nor Fujifilm XQ1 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections: Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
LCD Screen Size and Features
Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".
Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Samsung ST6500 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3" (6.08 x 4.56 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Fujifilm XQ1 has a 12.0MP 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm ) sized CMOS X-TRANS II sensor .
Below you can see the ST6500 and XQ1 sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 Cameras
As seen above, Fujifilm XQ1 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Samsung ST6500. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
Samsung ST6500 features a 26-130 mm 5× zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XQ1 features a 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4× zoom lens.
Fujifilm XQ1 has 1mm wider coverage than the Samsung ST6500. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f, Samsung ST6500 is faster at widest end.
On the tele end, Samsung ST6500 has 30mm longer reach than the Fujifilm XQ1. At f, it is also faster at tele end.
Wide Coverage
Compact Cameras
Max Aperture at Tele
Compact Cameras
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Max Aperture at Wide
Compact Cameras
In this section, we rank and compare Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.
Samsung ST6500 for Portrait Photography
Fujifilm XQ1 for Portrait Photography
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Samsung ST6500 for Street Photography
Fujifilm XQ1 for Street Photography
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Samsung ST6500 for Sports Photography
Fujifilm XQ1 for Sports Photography
Fast Lens at Tele: f
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
130 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Samsung ST6500 for Daily Photography
Fujifilm XQ1 for Daily Photography
Compact Body
Body Thickness 19mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
206g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
Read the details
Samsung ST6500 for Landscape Photography
Fujifilm XQ1 for Landscape Photography
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1, below you can find their scores in five different aspects.
Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.
Here is a summary of how Samsung ST6500 and Fujifilm XQ1 scores compare:
Samsung ST6500
Ranked
#136 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked
#1174 out of 1221 in all Cameras
Fujifilm XQ1
Ranked
#3 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked
#438 out of 1221 in all Cameras
Fujifilm XQ1 is the clear winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Samsung ST6500 in all criteria.
It has better general image quality, more features, more compact body and offers more value for the money
General |
Samsung ST6500 |
Fujifilm XQ1 |
Brand |
Samsung |
Fujifilm |
Announced |
2011-01-19 |
2013-11-26 |
Body Type |
Ultracompact |
Ultracompact |
Sensor |
|
|
Type |
CCD |
CMOS X-TRANS II |
Size |
1/2.3" |
2/3" |
Dimensions |
6.08 x 4.56 mm |
8.8 x 6.6 mm |
Area |
27.72mm2 |
58.08mm2 |
Megapixels |
16 megapixels |
12 megapixels |
Max Resolution |
4608 x 3456 |
4000 x 3000 |
Max Native Light sensitivity |
3,200 ISO |
12,800 ISO |
Min Native Light sensitivity |
80 ISO |
100 ISO |
RAW Support |
|
|
Autofocus |
|
|
AF Touch |
|
|
AF Continuous |
|
|
AF Single |
|
|
AF Tracking |
|
|
AF Selective |
|
|
AF Center |
|
|
AF Multi Area |
|
|
AF Live View |
|
|
AF Face Detection |
|
|
AF Contrast Detection |
|
|
AF Phase Detection |
|
|
Number of Focus Points |
n/a |
n/a |
Lens |
|
|
Manual Focus |
|
|
Lens Mount |
fixed lens |
fixed lens |
Lens Focal Range |
26-130 mm (5×) |
25-100 mm (4×) |
Max Aperture |
no lens |
F1.8-4.9 |
Macro Focus Range |
n/a |
3cm |
Screen |
|
|
Type |
Fixed type |
Fixed type |
Size |
3" |
3" |
Resolution |
460k dots |
920k dots |
Touch Screen |
|
|
Viewfinder |
|
|
Viewfinder |
None |
None |
Photography Features |
|
|
Max Mechanical Shutter |
1/2000s |
1/4000s |
Shutter Priority |
|
|
Aperture Priority |
|
|
Manual Exposure Mode |
|
|
Custom White Balance |
|
|
Image Stabilization |
No |
Optical |
Built-in Flash |
|
|
Flash Range |
n/a |
7.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
External Flash |
|
|
Continuous Shooting |
n/a |
12.0 fps |
Multi-Segment |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
Partial |
|
|
AF-Area |
|
|
Center Weighted |
|
|
AE Bracketing |
|
|
WB Bracketing |
|
|
Video Features |
|
|
Max Video Resolution |
1280 x 720 |
1920 x 1080 |
Video Formats |
n/a |
MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone Port |
|
|
Headphone Port |
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Wireless Connectivity |
None |
Built-In |
HDMI |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
Environmental Sealing |
|
|
Weight |
n/a |
206g |
Dimensions |
102 x 57 x 19mm |
100 x 59 x 33mm |
Battery Life |
n/a |
240 shots |
Other Features |
|
|
Timelapse Recording |
|
|
GPS |
None |
None |
DxO Sensor Scores |
|
|
|
Report a correction |
Report a correction |