CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Samsung SL202

10 MP | 1/2.33 CCD Sensor

Samsung SL202
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Fujifilm X30

12 MP | 2/3 CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

Fujifilm X30
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing SL202 and X30, two Small Sensor Compact cameras from Samsung and Fujifilm. Samsung SL202 has a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Fujifilm X30 has a 12.0MP 2/3-inch sensor. Samsung SL202 was introduced to market in February 2009 and Fujifilm X30 was launched in August 2014. As you can see, SL202 is 5 years older than X30. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Samsung SL202 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-02-17
  • 10MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 28-102 mm F2.8-5.7 Zoom Lens
  • 2.7" Fixed Type Screen
  • continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 168g. 92 x 61 x 23 mm
  • Also known as PL50

Fujifilm X30 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-08-26
  • 12MP - 2/3-inch CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 28-112 mm F2.0-2.8 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • 2360k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 12 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 423g. 119 x 72 x 60 mm
  • Replaced Fujifilm X20 Compare

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Samsung SL202 over Fujifilm X30
Weight
168 g vs 423 g 255 g lighter


Reasons to choose Fujifilm X30 over Samsung SL202
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
LCD Screen
Tilting vs Fixed Type Flexible shooting positions
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs No Better for flash photography
Viewfinder
Electronic vs None Better framing and control
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Max Sensor Resolution
12 MP vs 10 MP 19% more pixels
Max ISO
12.800 vs 1.600 700% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
920k dots vs 230k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/4000s vs 1/1500s faster mechanical shutter
Manual Exposure
Yes vs No better exposure control
Microphone Port
Yes vs No High quality audio recording option
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Focal Length - Tele
112mm vs 102mm 10 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
4� vs 3.6x more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
2.00 vs 2.80 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
2.80 vs 5.70 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
7.0m vs 4.6m 2.4m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area
4.84µm2 vs 2.78µm2 74% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone

Common Strengths of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs Yes very handy for portraits
Continuous Shooting
fps vs 12.0fps Fast shooting speeds
Common Weaknesses of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Samsung SL202 has external dimensions of 92 x 61 x 23 mm (3.62 x 2.4 x 0.91″) and weighs 168 g (0.37 lb / 5.93 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm X30 has external dimensions of 119 x 72 x 60 mm (4.69 x 2.83 x 2.36″) and weighs 423 g (0.93 lb / 14.92 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30. Samsung SL202 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 27mm narrower, 11mm shorter and 37mm thinner than Fujifilm X30.

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30.

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30.
Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung SL202 is significantly lighter (255g ) than the Fujifilm X30 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Samsung SL202 (PL50) nor Fujifilm X30 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Fujifilm X30's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Samsung SL202's 2.7" screen.

In addition to the size advantage, Fujifilm X30 LCD screen also has a Tilting feature where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels. On the other hand, Samsung SL202 has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to X30.
Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30: Sensor Comparison

Samsung SL202 has a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.08 x 4.56 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Fujifilm X30 has a 12.0MP 2/3-inch (8.8 x 6.6 mm ) sized CMOS X-TRANS II sensor and features EXR Processor II processor.

Below you can see the SL202 and X30 sensor size comparison.

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 Cameras


As seen above, Fujifilm X30 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Samsung SL202. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30 Lens Specs Comparison

Samsung SL202 features a 28-102 mm F2.8-5.7 3.6x zoom lens whereas Fujifilm X30 features a 28-112 mm F2.0-2.8 4� zoom lens.

Both cameras have a wide angle coverage of 28mm. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f2.00, Fujifilm X30 is faster than Samsung SL202 at this focal length. On the tele end, Fujifilm X30 has 10mm longer reach than the Samsung SL202. At f2.80, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

SL202
X30
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Samsung SL202 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm X30 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Small 1/2.33 sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3 sensor
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Samsung SL202 for Street Photography

POOR

Fujifilm X30 for Street Photography

EXCELLENT
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.33 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.00
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3 sensor
Read the details

Samsung SL202 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm X30 for Sports Photography

POOR
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1500s
Focus Points
102 mm Tele Lens
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
49 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
112 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Samsung SL202 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm X30 for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
168g
Small 1/2.33 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
3.6X Optical Zoom
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3 sensor
423g
Body Thickness 60mm
Read the details

Samsung SL202 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm X30 for Landscape Photography

POOR
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.33 sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3 sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Samsung SL202 vs Fujifilm X30: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Samsung SL202 and Fujifilm X30 scores compare:

Samsung SL202
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #429 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1135 out of 1226 in all Cameras
Fujifilm X30
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #2 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #235 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Fujifilm X30 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Samsung SL202 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Samsung SL202. Otherwise, Fujifilm X30 is the better camera overall.

Samsung SL202
Samsung SL202
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm X30
Fujifilm X30
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm X30 vs Samsung SL202 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Samsung SL202 Fujifilm X30
Brand Samsung Fujifilm
Announced 2009-02-17 2014-08-26
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Type CCD CMOS X-TRANS II
Size 1/2.3-inch 2/3-inch
Dimensions 6.08 x 4.56 mm 8.8 x 6.6 mm
Area 27.72mm2 58.08mm2
Megapixels 10 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 3648 x 2736 4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity 1,600 ISO 12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a 49
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 28-102 mm (3.6x) 28-112 mm (4�)
Max Aperture F2.8-5.7 F2.0-2.8
Macro Focus Range 5cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Tilting
Size 2.7" 3"
Resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution no electronic viewfinder 2,360k dots
Viewfinder Coverage n/a 100%
Viewfinder Magnification n/a 0.65x
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1500s 1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 4.60 m 7.00 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting n/a 12.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 1920 x 1080
Video Formats Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 168g 423g
Dimensions 92 x 61 x 23mm 119 x 72 x 60mm
Battery Life n/a 470 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Pentax K-m
10 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Pentax K-3 III
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Sigma fp L
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction