Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Samsung NX100 has external dimensions of 120 x 71 x 35 mm (4.72 x 2.8 x 1.38″) and weighs 282 g (0.62 lb / 9.95 oz) (including batteries). Casio EX-100 has external dimensions of 119x67x50 mm and weighs 389 g (including batteries).
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100. Casio EX-100 is 1mm narrower and 4mm shorter than Samsung NX100 but it is also 15mm thicker. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Casio EX-100 has a built-in lens but Samsung NX100 doesn't. Once you put a lens on NX100, its thickness will increase significantly.
Comparison image of Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Samsung NX100 is significantly lighter (107g ) than the Casio EX-100 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.
Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on NX100, the total kit will weigh much higher.
Weather Sealing
Unfortunately neither Samsung NX100 nor Casio Exilim EX-100 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections: Top Mirrorless Cameras with Weather Sealing Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
LCD Screen Size and Features
Casio EX-100's 3.5" LCD screen is slightly larger than Samsung NX100's 3" screen.
In addition to the size advantage, Casio EX-100 LCD screen also has a
Tilting feature where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels. On the other hand, Samsung NX100 has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to EX-100.
Samsung NX100 has a 15.0MP APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features DRIMe Engine processor. On the other hand, Casio EX-100 has a 12.0MP 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .
Below you can see the NX100 and EX-100 sensor size comparison.
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100 Cameras
As seen above, Samsung NX100 has a 8.8x Larger sensor area than Casio EX-100. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
In this section, we rank and compare Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.
Samsung NX100 for Portrait Photography
Casio EX-100 for Portrait Photography
Large APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 15.0MP
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Samsung NX100 for Street Photography
Casio EX-100 for Street Photography
Large APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Image Stabilization
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Optional External Viewfinder
Medium sized Body
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Samsung NX100 for Sports Photography
Casio EX-100 for Sports Photography
Image Stabilization
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
15 Focus Points
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Fast Continuous Shooting: 30.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/20000s
25 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
300 mm Tele Lens
Fast Lens at Tele: f2.80
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Samsung NX100 for Daily Photography
Casio EX-100 for Daily Photography
Compact Body
10.7X Optical Zoom
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
389g
Body Thickness 50mm
Read the details
Samsung NX100 for Landscape Photography
Casio EX-100 for Landscape Photography
Large APS-C (23.4 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Live-view
Average Resolution Sensor: 15.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100, below you can find their scores in five different aspects.
Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.
Here is a summary of how Samsung NX100 and Casio EX-100 scores compare:
Samsung NX100
Ranked
#100 out of 126 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked
#425 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Casio EX-100
Ranked
#11 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked
#301 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Casio EX-100 has a higher Overall Score than the Samsung NX100 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.
General |
Samsung NX100 |
Casio Exilim EX-100 |
Brand |
Samsung |
Casio |
Announced |
2010-09-14 |
2014-02-06 |
Body Type |
Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Compact |
Sensor |
|
|
Type |
CMOS |
CMOS |
Size |
APS-C |
1/1.7" |
Dimensions |
23.4 x 15.6 mm |
7.44 x 5.58 mm |
Area |
365.04mm2 |
41.52mm2 |
Megapixels |
15 megapixels |
12 megapixels |
Max Resolution |
4592 x 3056 |
4000 x 3000 |
Max Native Light sensitivity |
6,400 ISO |
12,800 ISO |
Max Boosted Light Sensitivity |
- |
25600 ISO |
Min Native Light sensitivity |
100 ISO |
80 ISO |
RAW Support |
|
|
Autofocus |
|
|
AF Touch |
|
|
AF Continuous |
|
|
AF Single |
|
|
AF Tracking |
|
|
AF Selective |
|
|
AF Center |
|
|
AF Multi Area |
|
|
AF Live View |
|
|
AF Face Detection |
|
|
AF Contrast Detection |
|
|
AF Phase Detection |
|
|
Number of Focus Points |
15 |
25 |
Lens |
|
|
Manual Focus |
|
|
Lens Mount |
Samsung NX |
fixed lens |
Lens Focal Range |
no lens |
28-300 mm (10.7×) |
Max Aperture |
no lens |
F2.8 |
Macro Focus Range |
no lens |
5cm |
Screen |
|
|
Type |
Fixed type |
Tilting |
Size |
3" |
3.5" |
Resolution |
614k dots |
922k dots |
Touch Screen |
|
|
Viewfinder |
|
|
Viewfinder |
Electronic (optional) |
None |
Photography Features |
|
|
Max Mechanical Shutter |
1/4000s |
1/20000s |
Shutter Priority |
|
|
Aperture Priority |
|
|
Manual Exposure Mode |
|
|
Custom White Balance |
|
|
Image Stabilization |
Digital only |
Sensor-shift |
Built-in Flash |
|
|
Flash Range |
no built-in flash |
6.10 m |
Max Flash Sync |
1/180s |
s |
External Flash |
|
|
Continuous Shooting |
3.0 fps |
30.0 fps |
Multi-Segment |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Spot |
|
|
Partial |
|
|
AF-Area |
|
|
Center Weighted |
|
|
AE Bracketing |
|
|
WB Bracketing |
|
|
Video Features |
|
|
Max Video Resolution |
1280 x 720 |
1920 x 1080 |
Video Formats |
H.264 |
n/a |
Microphone Port |
|
|
Headphone Port |
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
Wireless Connectivity |
None |
Built-In |
HDMI |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
Environmental Sealing |
|
|
Weight |
282g |
389g |
Dimensions |
120 x 71 x 35mm |
119x67x50mm |
Battery Life |
420 shots |
390 shots |
Other Features |
|
|
Timelapse Recording |
|
|
GPS |
Optional |
None |
DxO Sensor Scores |
|
|
DxO Overall Score |
62 |
not tested |
DxO Color Depth |
22.6 |
not tested |
DxO Dynamic Range |
10.7 |
not tested |
DxO Low Light ISO |
563 |
not tested |
|
Report a correction |
Report a correction |