CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Samsung Galaxy Camera

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Samsung Galaxy Camera
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus XZ-2 iHS

12 MP | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) CMOS Sensor

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Samsung and Olympus. Samsung Galaxy Camera was introduced to market in February 2013 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS was launched in December 2012. There is only 2 months difference between Galaxy Camera and XZ-2 iHS so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Samsung Galaxy Camera has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a 12.0MP 1/1.7-inch sensor.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Samsung Galaxy Camera Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2013-02-19
  • 16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • 23-481 mm F2.8-5.9 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 4.8" Fixed Type Screen
  • Unknown continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 120fps High-Speed Video
  • Built-in Wireless
  • Built-in GPS
  • 300g. 129 x 71 x 19 mm
  • Also known as Wi-Fi

Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2012-12-18
  • 12MP - 1/1.7-inch CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 28-112 mm F1.8-2.5 Zoom Lens
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • Unknown continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 346g. 113 x 65 x 48 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Camera over Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs Eye-Fi Connected Better connectivity
GPS
BuiltIn vs None track your location
Max Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 12 MP 33% more pixels
LCD Screen Size
4.8" vs 3" 1.8 inches larger display
Weight
300 g vs 346 g 46 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide
23mm vs 28mm 5 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
481mm vs 112mm 369 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
20.9× vs 4x more flexible focal coverage


Reasons to choose Olympus XZ-2 iHS over Samsung Galaxy Camera
LCD Screen
Tilting vs Fixed Type Flexible shooting positions
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs No Better for flash photography
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max ISO
12.800 vs 3.200 300% higher Max ISO
Max Aperture - Wide
1.80 vs 2.80 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
2.50 vs 5.90 faster lens at tele
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Built-in ND Filter
Yes vs No Use larger aperture under strong light

Common Strengths of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Image Stabilization
Optical vs Sensor-shift Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Touch Screen
Yes vs Yes Easy control of camera functions
LCD Screen Resolution
922k dots vs 920k dots High resolution screens
Manual Focusing
Yes vs Yes both have manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Microphone Port
Yes vs Yes High quality audio recording option
Common Weaknesses of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Continuous Shooting
fps vs fps Slow shooting speeds
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Samsung Galaxy Camera has external dimensions of 129 x 71 x 19 mm (5.08 x 2.8 x 0.75″) and weighs 300 g (0.66 lb / 10.58 oz) (including batteries). Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external dimensions of 113 x 65 x 48 mm (4.45 x 2.56 x 1.89″) and weighs 346 g (0.76 lb / 12.20 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. Olympus XZ-2 iHS is 16mm narrower and 6mm shorter than Samsung Galaxy Camera but it is also 29mm thicker.

Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung Galaxy Camera is 46g lighter than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Samsung Galaxy Camera (Wi-Fi) nor Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Samsung Galaxy Camera's 4.8" LCD screen is slightly larger than Olympus XZ-2 iHS's 3" screen.

On the other hand, Olympus XZ-2 iHS LCD screen has a Tilting feature where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels. On the other hand, Samsung Galaxy Camera has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to XZ-2 iHS.
Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS: Sensor Comparison

Samsung Galaxy Camera has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features 1.4GHz Quad-Core processor. On the other hand, Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a 12.0MP 1/1.7-inch (7.44 x 5.58 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the Galaxy Camera and XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison.

Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Cameras


As seen above, Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a 1.5x Larger sensor area than Samsung Galaxy Camera. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Lens Specs Comparison

Samsung Galaxy Camera features a 23-481 mm F2.8-5.9 20.9× zoom lens whereas Olympus XZ-2 iHS features a 28-112 mm F1.8-2.5 4x zoom lens.

Samsung Galaxy Camera has 5mm wider coverage than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f1.80, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Samsung Galaxy Camera has 369mm longer reach than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS. However, with a max aperture of f2.50, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

Galaxy Camera
XZ-2 iHS
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Samsung Galaxy Camera for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Samsung Galaxy Camera for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Street Photography

EXCELLENT
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
23 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Read the details

Samsung Galaxy Camera for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Wireless Connection
481 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
35 Focus Points
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
112 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Samsung Galaxy Camera for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
Body Thickness 19mm
20.9X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
346g
Body Thickness 48mm
Read the details

Samsung Galaxy Camera for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Landscape Photography

POOR
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
23 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Built-in GPS
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Samsung Galaxy Camera vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Samsung Galaxy Camera and Olympus XZ-2 iHS scores compare:

Samsung Galaxy Camera
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #81 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #532 out of 1225 in all Cameras
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #8 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #290 out of 1225 in all Cameras

Olympus XZ-2 iHS is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Samsung Galaxy Camera in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Samsung Galaxy Camera. Otherwise, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is the better camera overall.

Samsung Galaxy Camera
Samsung Galaxy Camera
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus XZ-2 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Samsung Galaxy Camera Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Brand Samsung Olympus
Announced 2013-02-19 2012-12-18
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Size 1/2.3-inch 1/1.7-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Area 28.07mm2 41.52mm2
Megapixels 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max Native Light sensitivity 3,200 ISO 12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a 35
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 23-481 mm (20.9×) 28-112 mm (4x)
Max Aperture F2.8-5.9 F1.8-2.5
Macro Focus Range n/a 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Tilting
Size 4.8" 3"
Resolution 922k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization Optical Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range n/a 8.60 m (ISO 800)
External Flash
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1920 x 1080
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 300g 346g
Dimensions 129 x 71 x 19mm 113 x 65 x 48mm
Battery Life n/a 340 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS Built-in None
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score not tested 49
DxO Color Depth not tested 20.4
DxO Dynamic Range not tested 11.3
DxO Low Light ISO not tested 216
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Pentax K-3 III
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Sigma fp L
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction