Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh WG-6

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung ST93

16 MP | 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh WG-6, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Samsung ST93, which was introduced in April 2011 is a Ultracompact camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, ST93 is 7 years older than WG-6. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

Digital only Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840x2160 video resolution

246g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Replaced Ricoh WG-5 GPS Compare

Samsung ST93 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-04-20

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 100 - 3200

Mount

3" Fixed Type Screen

continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

110g. 92 x 53 x 17 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Ricoh WG-6 over Samsung ST93

Image Stabilization	Digital only vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 16 MP	25% more pixels
Max ISO	6.400 vs 3.200	100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 460k dots	126% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Focal Length - Tele	140mm vs mm	140 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5x vs	more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution	3840x2160 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Digital video stabilization	Yes vs No	Stabilizes your videos in-camera

Reasons to choose Samsung ST93 over Ricoh WG-6

Weight	110 g vs 246 g	136 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide	mm vs 28mm	28 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	vs 5.50	faster lens at tele

Common Strengths of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Continuous Shooting	fps vs fps	Slow shooting speeds

Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh WG-6 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 246 g (0.54 lb / 8.68 oz) (including batteries). Samsung ST93 has external dimensions of 92 x 53 x 17 mm (3.62 x 2.09 x 0.67″) and weighs 110 g (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93. Samsung ST93 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 26mm narrower, 13mm shorter and 16mm thinner than Ricoh WG-6.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung ST93 is significantly lighter (136g ) than the Ricoh WG-6 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Samsung ST93 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.16 x 4.62 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Below you can see the WG-6 and ST93 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 Cameras

Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 have almost the same sensor size so none of them has any significant advantage over other in providing control over depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93 Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Samsung ST93 features a zoom lens.

Samsung ST93 has 28mm wider coverage than the Ricoh WG-6. At f, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Ricoh WG-6 has 140mm longer reach than the Samsung ST93. However, with a max aperture of f, Samsung ST93 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

WG-6

ST93

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh WG-6 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung ST93 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Street Photography

GOOD

Samsung ST93 for Street Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f
mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung ST93 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Samsung ST93 for Daily Photography

POOR

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
246g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
110g
Body Thickness 17mm
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
X Optical Zoom
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung ST93 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 vs Samsung ST93: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh WG-6 and Samsung ST93 scores compare:

Ricoh WG-6

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #72 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #513 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Samsung ST93

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #127 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1162 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Ricoh WG-6 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Samsung ST93 in all criteria except one: Portability. But the size difference between these cameras are negligible in real world so it is not a big disadvantage for Ricoh WG-6.

Samsung ST93 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh WG-6	Samsung ST93
Brand	Ricoh	Samsung
Announced	2018-02-21	2011-04-20
Body Type	Compact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.16 x 4.62 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.46mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	no lens
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	no lens
Macro Focus Range	1cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	1,040k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Digital only	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	n/a
External Flash
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840x2160	1280 x 720
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	246g	110g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	92 x 53 x 17mm
Battery Life	340 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction