CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
    • All Cameras
    • Cameras by Brand
      • Sony Cameras
      • Canon Cameras
      • Nikon Cameras
      • Pentax Cameras
      • Fujifilm Cameras
      • Olympus Cameras
      • Panasonic Cameras
      • Leica Cameras
      • Samsung Cameras
    • Cameras by Body Type
      • Mirrorless Cameras
      • DSLR Cameras
      • Compact Cameras
      • Bridge Cameras
      • Waterproof Cameras
  • LENSES
    • All Lenses
    • Lenses by Mount
      • Sony E Mount Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF M Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF S Mount Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Lenses
      • Pentax KAF Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm G Mount Lenses
      • Sigma SA Mount Lenses
      • Sony Alpha Mount Lenses
    • Teleconverters
  • TOOLS
    • Cameras
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Lenses
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
  • BLOG

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Ricoh WG-6

20 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

Ricoh WG-6
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus FE-5020

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

Olympus FE-5020
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh WG-6, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3 sensor whereas Olympus FE-5020, which was introduced in July 2009 is a Small Sensor Compact camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, FE-5020 is 9 years older than WG-6. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2018-02-21
  • 20MP - 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • fps continuous shooting
  • 4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution
  • 246g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm
  • Weather Sealed Body
  • Replaced Ricoh WG-5 GPS Compare

Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-07-22
  • 12MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 24-120 mm F3.3-5.8 Zoom Lens
  • 2.70" Fixed Type Screen
  • fps continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 137g. 93 x 56 x 25 mm
  • Weather Sealed Body
  • Also known as X-935

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.


Related Blog Posts

Nikon Z30 vs Sony ZV-E10 Size Comparison
New Insta360 One RS 1-Inch 360-Degree Camera Shoots 6K Video and 21MP Stills
Sony FE 100-400 E vs Canon 100-500 RF vs Nikon Z 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-400 Lens Size Comparison
Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-55 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-80 F4 vs Fujifilm 18-55 F2.8-4 Lens Size and Specs Comparison
Todays Deals: Samyang 12mm F2 for $399, Bolt Flashes for $49 and more
Panasonic GH6 Update Brings 4K 120 FPS RAW Recording
Cameras with Stacked Sensors and No Blackout Viewfinders in 2022
Todays Deals: Tripod, Microphone and more


**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh WG-6 over Olympus FE-5020
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
20 MP vs 12 MP 66% more pixels
Max ISO
6.400 vs 1.600 300% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3 vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
1.040k dots vs 230k dots 352% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/4000s vs 1/500s faster mechanical shutter
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Focal Length - Tele
140mm vs 120mm 20 mm longer tele reach
Max Aperture - Tele
5.50 vs 5.80 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
5.5m vs 4.1m 1.4m longer range
Max Video Resolution
3840 x 2160 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Digital video stabilization
Yes vs No Stabilizes your videos in-camera
CHECK WG-6 PRICE


Reasons to choose Olympus FE-5020 over Ricoh WG-6
Weight
137 g vs 246 g 109 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 28mm 4 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
3.30 vs 3.50 faster lens at wide
Sensor Pixel Area
2.38µm2 vs 1.39µm2 71% larger pixel area
CHECK FE-5020 PRICE

Common Strengths of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Environmental Sealing
Yes vs Yes shoot at tough conditions
Common Weaknesses of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020
In-body Image Stabilization
Digital only vs No No Built-in stabilization
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support
No vs No Lower image quality
LCD Screen Size
2.70" vs 2.70" Small display
Continuous Shooting
fps vs fps Slow shooting speeds
New5
Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh WG-6 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 246 g (0.54 lb / 8.68 oz) (including batteries). Olympus FE-5020 has external dimensions of 93 x 56 x 25 mm (3.66 x 2.2 x 0.98″) and weighs 137 g (0.30 lb / 4.83 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020. Olympus FE-5020 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 25mm narrower, 10mm shorter and 8mm thinner than Ricoh WG-6.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Olympus FE-5020 is significantly lighter (109g ) than the Ricoh WG-6 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh WG-6's 3.00" LCD screen is slightly larger than Olympus FE-5020's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3 (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Olympus FE-5020 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features TruePic III processor.

Ricoh WG-6's sensor provides 8MP more than Olympus FE-5020's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the WG-6 and FE-5020 sensor size comparison.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 Cameras


Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 have the same sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Olympus FE-5020 has 71% larger pixel area (2.38µm2 vs 1.39µm2) compared to Ricoh WG-6, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020 Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Olympus FE-5020 features a 24-120 mm F3.3-5.8 5× zoom lens.

Olympus FE-5020 has 4mm wider coverage than the Ricoh WG-6. At f3.30, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Ricoh WG-6 has 20mm longer reach than the Olympus FE-5020. At f5.50, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

WG-6
FE-5020
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh WG-6 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus FE-5020 for Portrait Photography

POOR
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus FE-5020 for Street Photography

POOR
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Small Body
Live-view
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus FE-5020 for Sports Photography

POOR
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details
Environmental Sealings
120 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/500s
Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.80
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus FE-5020 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
246g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
Compact Body
137g
Environmental Sealings
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus FE-5020 for Landscape Photography

POOR
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details
Environmental Sealings
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 vs Olympus FE-5020: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh WG-6 and Olympus FE-5020 scores compare:

Ricoh WG-6
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #67 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #526 out of 1244 in all Cameras
Olympus FE-5020
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #463 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1207 out of 1244 in all Cameras

Ricoh WG-6 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Olympus FE-5020 in all criteria except one: Portability. But the size difference between these cameras are negligible in real world so it is not a big disadvantage for Ricoh WG-6.

Ricoh WG-6
Ricoh WG-6
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus FE-5020
Olympus FE-5020
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus FE-5020 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Ricoh WG-6 Olympus FE-5020
Brand Ricoh Olympus
Announced 2018-02-21 2009-07-22
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Type BSI-CMOS CCD
Size 1/2.3 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 5184 x 3888 3968 x 2976
Max Native Light sensitivity 6,400 ISO 1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 125 ISO 64 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 28-140 mm (5x) 24-120 mm (5×)
Max Aperture F3.5-5.5 F3.3-5.8
Macro Focus Range 1cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3.00" 2.70"
Resolution 1,040k dots 230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/4000s 1/500s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization Digital only No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) 4.10 m
External Flash
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 3840 x 2160 640 x 480
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Supports FlashAir SD cards None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 246g 137g
Dimensions 118 x 66 x 33mm 93 x 56 x 25mm
Battery Life 340 shots n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS Built-in None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Sony A7 IV
33 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7R IV
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Nikon Z9
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Canon R3
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-T30 II
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Top Rated Waterproof Cameras
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $200
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $500
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $750
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $1000
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Compact Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Nikon Z30
21 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Fujifilm X-H2S
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R7
33 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon R10
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Ricoh WG-80
16 MP | 1/2.3 Sensor | 28-140 mm
Panasonic GH6
25 MP | Four Thirds Sensor | Micro Four Thirds Mount
OM System OM-1
20 MP | Four Thirds Sensor | Micro Four Thirds Mount
Canon R5 C
45 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Copyright © 2022 by CameraDecision
Privacy About Contact Us SpeakerDecision

Report a Correction