Ricoh WG-6 vs Canon 4000D Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh WG-6

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Canon 4000D

18 MP | APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh WG-6 vs Canon 4000D Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh WG-6, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3" sensor whereas Canon 4000D, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Entry-Level DSLR camera with a 18.0MP APS-C sensor. Both WG-6 and 4000D were launched within the same month so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and available technology level.

Comparing a DSLR camera to a Fixed Lens camera is not an easy task but we will do our best to make this a fair comparison.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

246g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Replaced Ricoh WG-5 GPS Compare

Canon 4000D Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-26

18MP - APS-C CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400 ( expands to 12800)

Canon EF/EF-S Mount

2.70" Fixed Type Screen

Optical (pentamirror) viewfinder

3.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

436g. 129 x 102 x 77 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

Sony A7 IV vs Canon EOS R6 vs Nikon Z6 II: Which is a Better Buy?
Lenses with Built-in Teleconverters and Advantages vs External TCs
This is the Silky Swift 400mm that you have been waiting for: Nikkor NIKKOR Z 400mm f2.8 TC VR S
Canon EOS R5 C has a Design Flaw?
Canon EOS R5 C is Official: What is Good and What is not
Best Selling Cameras among Camera Decision Readers in 2021
Long rumored Canon EOS R5C Coming Soon: No more Overheating
10 Best-selling mirrorless cameras in Japan 2021

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh WG-6 over Canon EOS 4000D

Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 18 MP	11% more pixels
LCD Screen Size	3" vs 2.7	0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 230k dots	352% higher resolution screen
Weight	246 g vs 436 g	190 g lighter
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
Digital video stabilization	Yes vs No	Stabilizes your videos in-camera

Reasons to choose Canon EOS 4000D over Ricoh WG-6

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Supports FlashAir SD cards	Better connectivity
External Flash Shoe	Yes vs No	Better for flash photography
Viewfinder	Optical vs None	Better framing and control
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Battery Life	500 shots vs 340 shots	160 more frames with a single charge
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Flash Coverage	9.2m vs 5.5m	3.7m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	18.54µm² vs 1.39µm²	1233% larger pixel area

Common Strengths of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon EOS 4000D

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Max Resolution	20 MP vs 18 MP	Bigger prints and more details
AE Bracketing	Yes vs Yes	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon EOS 4000D

In-body Image Stabilization	Digital only vs No	No Built-in stabilization
Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
LCD Screen Size	2.70" vs 2.70"	Small display

Ricoh WG-6 vs Canon 4000D: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh WG-6 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 246 g (0.54 lb / 8.68 oz) (including batteries). Canon 4000D has external dimensions of 129 x 102 x 77 mm (5.08 x 4.02 x 3.03″) and weighs 436 g (0.96 lb / 15.38 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D. Ricoh WG-6 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 11mm narrower, 36mm shorter and 44mm thinner than Canon 4000D. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Ricoh WG-6 has a built-in lens but Canon 4000D doesn't. Once you put a lens on 4000D, its thickness will increase significantly.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D.

Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh WG-6 is significantly lighter (190g ) than the Canon 4000D which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on 4000D, the total kit will weigh much higher.

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh WG-6's 3.00" LCD screen is slightly larger than Canon 4000D's 2.7 screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh WG-6 vs Canon 4000D: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh WG-6 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Canon 4000D has a 18.0MP APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features Digic 4+ processor.

Below you can see the WG-6 and 4000D sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D Cameras

As seen above, Canon 4000D has a 11.8x Larger sensor area than Ricoh WG-6. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

What types of Photography are Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh WG-6 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Canon 4000D for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 18.0MP
Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Canon 4000D for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
No Image Stabilization
Large Body
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon 4000D for Sports Photography

GOOD

Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No Image Stabilization
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Canon 4000D for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
246g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
Large Body
436g
Body Thickness 77mm
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Canon 4000D for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Large APS-C (22.3 x 14.9 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 18.0MP
Live-view
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh WG-6 vs Canon 4000D: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh WG-6 and Canon 4000D scores compare:

Ricoh WG-6

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #67 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #520 out of 1237 in all Cameras

Canon 4000D

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #45 out of 79 in Compact SLR cameras
Ranked #346 out of 1237 in all Cameras

Canon 4000D is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Ricoh WG-6 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Ricoh WG-6. Otherwise, Canon 4000D is the better camera overall.

Canon 4000D vs Ricoh WG-6 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh WG-6	Canon EOS 4000D
Brand	Ricoh	Canon
Announced	2018-02-21	2018-02-26
Body Type	Compact	Compact SLR
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CMOS
Size	1/2.3"	APS-C
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	22.3 x 14.9 mm
Area	28.07mm²	332.27mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	18 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	5184 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	6,400 ISO
Max Boosted Light Sensitivity	-	12800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	Canon EF/EF-S
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	no lens
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	no lens
Macro Focus Range	1cm	no lens
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	2.70"
Resolution	1,040k dots	230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder Coverage	n/a	95%
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	9.20 m (at ISO 100)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	3.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	246g	436g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	129 x 102 x 77mm
Battery Life	340 shots	500 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score	not tested	63
DxO Color Depth	not tested	21.9
DxO Dynamic Range	not tested	11.4
DxO Low Light ISO	not tested	695
	Report a correction	Report a correction