Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh G900

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung WB350F

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh G900, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3" sensor whereas Samsung WB350F, which was introduced in January 2014 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, WB350F is 4 years older than G900. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

247g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2014-01-07

16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

23-483 mm F2.8-5.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

276g. 114 x 65 x 25 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

Ricoh unveils the THETA X 360-degree Camera with 2.25-inch Screen

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh G900 over Samsung WB350F

Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 16 MP	25% more pixels
Max ISO	6.400 vs 3.200	100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 460k dots	126% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Weight	247 g vs 276 g	29 g lighter
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Aperture - Tele	5.50 vs 5.90	faster lens at tele
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Reasons to choose Samsung WB350F over Ricoh G900

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Supports FlashAir SD cards	Better connectivity
In-built Image Stabilization	Optical vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	23mm vs 28mm	5 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele	483mm vs 140mm	343 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	21× vs 5x	more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	2.80 vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
NFC Connection	Yes vs No	Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices

Common Strengths of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Manual Focusing	Yes vs Yes	both have manual focusing modes

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh G900 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries). Samsung WB350F has external dimensions of 114 x 65 x 25 mm (4.49 x 2.56 x 0.98″) and weighs 276 g (0.61 lb / 9.74 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F. Samsung WB350F is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 4mm narrower, 1mm shorter and 8mm thinner than Ricoh G900.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh G900 is 29g lighter than the Samsung WB350F but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh G900 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Samsung WB350F has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the G900 and WB350F sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F Cameras

Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F have the same sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh G900 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Samsung WB350F features a 23-483 mm F2.8-5.9 21× zoom lens.

Samsung WB350F has 5mm wider coverage than the Ricoh G900. At f2.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Samsung WB350F has 343mm longer telezoom reach than the Ricoh G900. However, with a max aperture of f5.50, Ricoh G900 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

G900

WB350F

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh G900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung WB350F for Portrait Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung WB350F for Street Photography

GOOD

Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
23 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung WB350F for Sports Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Wireless Connection
483 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung WB350F for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
247g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
276g
21.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung WB350F for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
23 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung WB350F: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh G900 and Samsung WB350F scores compare:

Ricoh G900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #66 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #521 out of 1237 in all Cameras

Samsung WB350F

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #154 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #705 out of 1237 in all Cameras

Ricoh G900 is the clear winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Samsung WB350F in all criteria. It has better general image quality, more features, more compact body and offers more value for the money

Samsung WB350F vs Ricoh G900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh G900	Samsung WB350F
Brand	Ricoh	Samsung
Announced	2018-02-21	2014-01-07
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3"	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	23-483 mm (21×)
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	F2.8-5.9
Macro Focus Range	1cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	1,040k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	n/a
External Flash
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	247g	276g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	114 x 65 x 25mm
Battery Life	340 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction