Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh G900

20 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung ST700

16 MP | 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh G900, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3" sensor whereas Samsung ST700, which was introduced in January 2011 is a Ultracompact camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, ST700 is 7 years older than G900. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3" BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

247g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Samsung ST700 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-01-05

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO -

Mount

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

g. 99 x 55 x 20 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh G900 over Samsung ST700

Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution	20 MP vs 16 MP	25% more pixels
Max ISO	6.400 vs 0	0% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	1.040k dots vs 230k dots	352% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Focal Length - Tele	140mm vs mm	140 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5x vs	more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Digital video stabilization	Yes vs No	Stabilizes your videos in-camera

Reasons to choose Samsung ST700 over Ricoh G900

Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
Weight	g vs 247 g	247 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide	mm vs 28mm	28 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	vs 5.50	faster lens at tele

Common Strengths of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700

In-body Image Stabilization	Digital only vs No	No Built-in stabilization
Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Continuous Shooting	fps vs fps	Slow shooting speeds

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh G900 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries). Samsung ST700 has external dimensions of 99 x 55 x 20 mm (3.9 x 2.17 x 0.79″) and weighs (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700. Samsung ST700 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 19mm narrower, 11mm shorter and 13mm thinner than Ricoh G900.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung ST700 is 247g lighter than the Ricoh G900 but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700: Sensor Comparison

Ricoh G900 has a 20.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Samsung ST700 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.16 x 4.62 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Below you can see the G900 and ST700 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 Cameras

Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 have almost the same sensor size so none of them has any significant advantage over other in providing control over depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700 Lens Specs Comparison

Ricoh G900 features a 28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 5x zoom lens whereas Samsung ST700 features a zoom lens.

Samsung ST700 has 28mm wider coverage than the Ricoh G900. At f, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Ricoh G900 has 140mm longer reach than the Samsung ST700. However, with a max aperture of f, Samsung ST700 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

G900

ST700

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh G900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung ST700 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung ST700 for Street Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f
mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung ST700 for Sports Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung ST700 for Daily Photography

POOR

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
247g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
Body Thickness 20mm
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
X Optical Zoom
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung ST700 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3″ (6.16 x 4.62 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung ST700: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh G900 and Samsung ST700 scores compare:

Ricoh G900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #66 out of 476 in Compact cameras
Ranked #521 out of 1237 in all Cameras

Samsung ST700
This camera is not rated yet!

Samsung ST700 vs Ricoh G900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh G900	Samsung ST700
Brand	Ricoh	Samsung
Announced	2018-02-21	2011-01-05
Body Type	Compact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3"	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.16 x 4.62 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.46mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	0 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	0 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	no lens
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	no lens
Macro Focus Range	1cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	1,040k dots	230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	n/a
External Flash
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1280 x 720
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	247g	n/a
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	99 x 55 x 20mm
Battery Life	340 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction