Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300M Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh G900

20 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung NX300M

20 MP | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300M Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh G900, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3 sensor whereas Samsung NX300M, which was introduced in January 2013 is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera with a 20.0MP APS-C sensor. As you can see, NX300M is 5 years older than G900. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Comparing an interchangeble lens camera to a fixed lens camera is a bit tricky but we will do our best to make this a fair comparison.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

247g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Samsung NX300M Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-01-03

20MP - APS-C CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 25600

Samsung NX Mount

3.30" Tilting Screen

9.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

331g. 122 x 64 x 41 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

Cinema Lenses Added to Our Database
Daily Deals: DJI Osmo Pocket, Adobe Photoshop Elements 2023 and more
Readers Vote: Which is the Best Flagship Camera?
Daily Deals: I am just a Messenger Bag
Daily Deals: A Travel tripod, an affordable UHS-II card and more
Sony FE 20-70mm F4 G is here! Specs and Price
Cameras with Largest Viewfinders in 2022
New Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports for E and L mount Price and Images

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh G900 over Samsung NX300M

Built-in Flash	Yes vs No	Useful in low-light
Internal Storage	6.5GB vs None	Extra built-in storage
LCD Resolution	1.040k dots vs 768k dots	35% higher resolution screen
Battery Life	340 shots vs 330 shots	10 more frames with a single charge
Weight	247 g vs 331 g	84 g lighter
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
Digital video stabilization	Yes vs No	Stabilizes your videos in-camera
USB Version	USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) vs USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)	Faster Data transfer from the camera

CHECK G900 PRICE

Reasons to choose Samsung NX300M over Ricoh G900

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Supports FlashAir SD cards	Better connectivity
LCD Screen	Tilting vs Fixed Type	Flexible shooting positions
External Flash Shoe	Yes vs No	Better for flash photography
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Max ISO	25.600 vs 6.400	300% higher Max ISO
Number of Focus Points	247 vs 9	238 more focus points
LCD Screen Size	3.3" vs 3	0.3 inches larger display
Max Mech. Shutter	1/6000s vs 1/4000s	faster mechanical shutter
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Sensor Pixel Area	18.48µm2 vs 1.39µm2	1229% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing Range	±3 EV vs ±2 EV	Wide Bracketing range is useful for HDR
NFC Connection	Yes vs No	Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices

CHECK NX300M PRICE

Common Strengths of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M

Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Max Resolution	20 MP vs 20 MP	Bigger prints and more details
LCD Screen Size	3.30" vs 3.30"	Large display
Max Continuous Shooting	fps vs 9.0fps	Fast shooting speeds
AE Bracketing	Yes vs Yes	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M

In-body Image Stabilization	Digital only vs No	No Built-in stabilization
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300M: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh G900 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries). Samsung NX300M has external dimensions of 122 x 64 x 41 mm (4.8 x 2.52 x 1.61″) and weighs 331 g (0.73 lb / 11.68 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M. Ricoh G900 is 4mm narrower and 8mm thinner than Samsung NX300M but it is also 2mm taller. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Ricoh G900 has a built-in lens but Samsung NX300M doesn't. Once you put a lens on NX300M, its thickness will increase significantly.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh G900 is significantly lighter (84g ) than the Samsung NX300M which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on NX300M, the total kit will weigh much higher.

Weather Sealing

Thanks to the weather sealed body of G900, you can use this camera with more confidence under conditions where there is risk of exposure to water and dust compared to NX300M.

LCD Screen Size and Features

Samsung NX300M's 3.30" LCD screen is slightly larger than Ricoh G900's 3 screen.

In addition to the size advantage, Samsung NX300M LCD screen also has a Tilting feature where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels. On the other hand, Ricoh G900 has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to NX300M.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300M: Sensor Comparison

Both Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M have 20.0 MP resolution sensors but Ricoh G900's sensor is 1/2.3 (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) and Samsung NX300M's sensor is APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ).

Since Samsung NX300M's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Ricoh G900.

Below you can see the G900 and NX300M sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M Cameras

As seen above, Samsung NX300M has a 13.1x Larger sensor area than Ricoh G900. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

What types of Photography are Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh G900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung NX300M for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung NX300M for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung NX300M for Sports Photography

AVERAGE

Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Fast Continuous Shooting: 9.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/6000s
247 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung NX300M for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
247g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Medium size Body
331g
Body Thickness 41mm
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung NX300M for Landscape Photography

POOR

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Live-view
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX300M: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX300M scores compare:

Ricoh G900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #66 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #540 out of 1257 in all Cameras

Samsung NX300M

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #81 out of 134 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked #382 out of 1257 in all Cameras

Samsung NX300M is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Ricoh G900 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Ricoh G900. Otherwise, Samsung NX300M is the better camera overall.

Samsung NX300M vs Ricoh G900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh G900	Samsung NX300M
Brand	Ricoh	Samsung
Announced	2018-02-21	2013-01-03
Body Type	Compact	Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CMOS
Size	1/2.3	APS-C
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	23.5 x 15.7 mm
Area	28.07mm²	368.95mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	20 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	5472 x 3648
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	25,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	247
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	Samsung NX
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	no lens
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	no lens
Macro Focus Range	1cm	no lens
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Tilting
Size	3.00"	3.30"
Resolution	1,040k dots	768k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/6000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	no built-in flash
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	9.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	247g	331g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	122 x 64 x 41mm
Battery Life	340 shots	330 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	Optional
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction