Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX200 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Ricoh G900

20 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung NX200

20 MP | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX200 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Ricoh G900, which was introduced in February 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 20.0MP 1/2.3 sensor whereas Samsung NX200, which was introduced in February 2012 is a Entry-Level Mirrorless camera with a 20.0MP APS-C sensor. As you can see, NX200 is 6 years older than G900. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Comparing an interchangeble lens camera to a fixed lens camera is a bit tricky but we will do our best to make this a fair comparison.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Ricoh G900 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2018-02-21

20MP - 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 125 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.5-5.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

4K (UHD) - 3840 x 2160 video resolution

247g. 118 x 66 x 33 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2012-02-28

20MP - APS-C CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 12800

Samsung NX Mount

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

7.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

223g. 117 x 63 x 36 mm

Replaced Samsung NX100 Compare

Samsung NX200 was replaced by Samsung NX210. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Samsung NX210 vs Samsung NX200
Samsung NX210 vs Ricoh G900

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

Readers Vote: Which is the Best Flagship Camera?
Daily Deals: I am just a Messenger Bag
Daily Deals: A Travel tripod, an affordable UHS-II card and more
Sony FE 20-70mm F4 G is here! Specs and Price
Cameras with Largest Viewfinders in 2022
New Sigma 60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG DN OS Sports for E and L mount Price and Images
Site Kaizen: Camera by Lens Mount Section
Canon EOS R10 Real World Review: The best camera under $1000?

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Ricoh G900 over Samsung NX200

Built-in Flash	Yes vs No	Useful in low-light
Internal Storage	6.5GB vs None	Extra built-in storage
LCD Resolution	1.040k dots vs 614k dots	69% higher resolution screen
Battery Life	340 shots vs 330 shots	10 more frames with a single charge
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160 vs 1920 x 1080	Higher Resolution Video
Digital video stabilization	Yes vs No	Stabilizes your videos in-camera
USB Version	USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) vs USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)	Faster Data transfer from the camera

CHECK G900 PRICE

Reasons to choose Samsung NX200 over Ricoh G900

External Flash Shoe	Yes vs No	Better for flash photography
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Max ISO	12.800 vs 6.400	100% higher Max ISO
Number of Focus Points	15 vs 9	6 more focus points
Weight	223 g vs 247 g	24 g lighter
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Sensor Pixel Area	18.48µm2 vs 1.39µm2	1229% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing Range	±3 EV vs ±2 EV	Wide Bracketing range is useful for HDR

CHECK NX200 PRICE

Common Strengths of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200

Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Max Resolution	20 MP vs 20 MP	Bigger prints and more details
Max Continuous Shooting	fps vs 7.0fps	Fast shooting speeds
AE Bracketing	Yes vs Yes	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Common Weaknesses of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200

In-body Image Stabilization	Digital only vs No	No Built-in stabilization
Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	Screen tilts or Flips out independently, perfect for both stills and video

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX200: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Ricoh G900 has external dimensions of 118 x 66 x 33 mm (4.65 x 2.6 x 1.3″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries). Samsung NX200 has external dimensions of 117 x 63 x 36 mm (4.61 x 2.48 x 1.42″) and weighs 223 g (0.49 lb / 7.87 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200. Samsung NX200 is 1mm narrower and 3mm shorter than Ricoh G900 but it is also 3mm thicker. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Ricoh G900 has a built-in lens but Samsung NX200 doesn't. Once you put a lens on NX200, its thickness will increase significantly.

Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200.

Top View Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung NX200 is 24g lighter than the Ricoh G900 but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on NX200, the total kit will weigh much higher.

Weather Sealing

Thanks to the weather sealed body of G900, you can use this camera with more confidence under conditions where there is risk of exposure to water and dust compared to NX200.

LCD Screen Size and Features

Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX200: Sensor Comparison

Both Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 have 20.0 MP resolution sensors but Ricoh G900's sensor is 1/2.3 (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) and Samsung NX200's sensor is APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ).

Since Samsung NX200's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Ricoh G900.

Below you can see the G900 and NX200 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 Cameras

As seen above, Samsung NX200 has a 13.1x Larger sensor area than Ricoh G900. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

What types of Photography are Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Ricoh G900 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung NX200 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung NX200 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Optional External Viewfinder
Medium sized Body
No Image Stabilization
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung NX200 for Sports Photography

AVERAGE

Environmental Sealings
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
9 Focus Points
Read the details

Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
15 Focus Points
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung NX200 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
Environmental Sealings
247g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
223g
Medium size Body
Read the details

Ricoh G900 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung NX200 for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE

Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Environmental Sealings
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Live-view
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Ricoh G900 vs Samsung NX200: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Ricoh G900 and Samsung NX200 scores compare:

Ricoh G900

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #66 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #540 out of 1257 in all Cameras

Samsung NX200

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #97 out of 134 in Rangefinder-style mirrorless cameras
Ranked #431 out of 1257 in all Cameras

Samsung NX200 has a higher Overall Score than the Ricoh G900 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Samsung NX200 vs Ricoh G900 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Ricoh G900	Samsung NX200
Brand	Ricoh	Samsung
Announced	2018-02-21	2012-02-28
Body Type	Compact	Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CMOS
Size	1/2.3	APS-C
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	23.5 x 15.7 mm
Area	28.07mm²	368.95mm²
Megapixels	20 megapixels	20 megapixels
Max Resolution	5184 x 3888	5472 x 3648
Max Native Light sensitivity	6,400 ISO	12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	125 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	15
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	Samsung NX
Lens Focal Range	28-140 mm (5x)	no lens
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.5	no lens
Macro Focus Range	1cm	no lens
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	1,040k dots	614k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	Electronic (optional)
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/4000s	1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Digital only	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	5.50 m (with Auto ISO)	no built-in flash
Max Flash Sync	n/a	1/180s
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	7.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	3840 x 2160	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Supports FlashAir SD cards	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	247g	223g
Dimensions	118 x 66 x 33mm	117 x 63 x 36mm
Battery Life	340 shots	330 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	Built-in	Optional
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score	not tested	69
DxO Color Depth	not tested	22.6
DxO Dynamic Range	not tested	12.6
DxO Low Light ISO	not tested	618
	Report a correction	Report a correction