Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Olympus VG-145

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Fujifilm XQ1

12 MP | 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing VG-145 and XQ1, two Ultracompact cameras from Olympus and Fujifilm. Olympus VG-145 was introduced to market in July 2011 and Fujifilm XQ1 was launched in November 2013. As you can see, VG-145 is 2 years older than XQ1. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Olympus VG-145 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-07-27

14MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 1600

26-130 mm F2.8-6.5 Zoom Lens

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

120g. 96 x 57 x 19 mm

Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-11-26

12MP - 2/3-inch CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

ISO 100 - 12800

25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

12.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

206g. 100 x 59 x 33 mm

Fujifilm XQ1 was replaced by Fujifilm XQ2. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Fujifilm XQ1
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Olympus VG-145

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

Nikon Z30 vs Sony ZV-E10 Size Comparison
New Insta360 One RS 1-Inch 360-Degree Camera Shoots 6K Video and 21MP Stills
Sony FE 100-400 E vs Canon 100-500 RF vs Nikon Z 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-400 Lens Size Comparison
Tamron 17-70 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-55 F2.8 vs Fujifilm 16-80 F4 vs Fujifilm 18-55 F2.8-4 Lens Size and Specs Comparison
Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Released for Fujifilm X Mount
Fujifilm G and X Mount Camera and Lens Deals - Save up to $2000
Todays Deals: Samyang 12mm F2 for $399, Bolt Flashes for $49 and more
Panasonic GH6 Update Brings 4K 120 FPS RAW Recording

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Olympus VG-145 over Fujifilm XQ1

Sensor Resolution	14 MP vs 12 MP	16% more pixels
Weight	120 g vs 206 g	86 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	130mm vs 100mm	30 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5× vs 4×	more flexible focal coverage

CHECK VG-145 PRICE

Reasons to choose Fujifilm XQ1 over Olympus VG-145

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs None	Better connectivity
In-built Image Stabilization	Optical vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Max ISO	12.800 vs 1.600	700% higher Max ISO
LCD Resolution	920k dots vs 230k dots	300% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Battery Life	240 shots vs 160 shots	80 more frames with a single charge
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 26mm	1 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 2.80	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 6.50	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	7.4m vs 4.4m	3m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	4.84µm² vs 2.04µm²	137% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

CHECK XQ1 PRICE

Common Strengths of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Continuous Shooting	fps vs 12.0fps	Fast shooting speeds

Common Weaknesses of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Olympus VG-145 has external dimensions of 96 x 57 x 19 mm (3.78 x 2.24 x 0.75″) and weighs 120 g (0.26 lb / 4.23 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XQ1 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 33 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.3″) and weighs 206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1. Olympus VG-145 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 4mm narrower, 2mm shorter and 14mm thinner than Fujifilm XQ1.

Comparison image of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1.

Comparison image of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1.

Top View Comparison image of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Olympus VG-145 is significantly lighter (86g ) than the Fujifilm XQ1 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Olympus VG-145 nor Fujifilm XQ1 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1: Sensor Comparison

Olympus VG-145 has a 14.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features TruePic III processor. On the other hand, Fujifilm XQ1 has a 12.0MP 2/3-inch (8.8 x 6.6 mm ) sized CMOS X-TRANS II sensor .

Below you can see the VG-145 and XQ1 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 Cameras

As seen above, Fujifilm XQ1 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Olympus VG-145. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Lens Specs Comparison

Olympus VG-145 features a 26-130 mm F2.8-6.5 5× zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XQ1 features a 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4× zoom lens.

Fujifilm XQ1 has 1mm wider coverage than the Olympus VG-145. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Olympus VG-145 has 30mm longer reach than the Fujifilm XQ1. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Fujifilm XQ1 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

VG-145

XQ1

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Olympus VG-145 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Olympus VG-145 for Street Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Street Photography

GOOD

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Olympus VG-145 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Sports Photography

POOR

Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
130 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 160 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.50
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Olympus VG-145 for Daily Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
120g
Body Thickness 19mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
206g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
Read the details

Olympus VG-145 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Landscape Photography

POOR

26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Olympus VG-145 vs Fujifilm XQ1: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Olympus VG-145 and Fujifilm XQ1 scores compare:

Olympus VG-145

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #106 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1122 out of 1244 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ1

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #2 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #464 out of 1244 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ1 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Olympus VG-145 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Olympus VG-145. Otherwise, Fujifilm XQ1 is the better camera overall.

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Olympus VG-145 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Olympus VG-145	Fujifilm XQ1
Brand	Olympus	Fujifilm
Announced	2011-07-27	2013-11-26
Body Type	Ultracompact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	CCD	CMOS X-TRANS II
Size	1/2.3-inch	2/3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	8.8 x 6.6 mm
Area	28.07mm²	58.08mm²
Megapixels	14 megapixels	12 megapixels
Max Resolution	4288 x 3216	4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity	1,600 ISO	12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	80 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	n/a	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	26-130 mm (5×)	25-100 mm (4×)
Max Aperture	F2.8-6.5	F1.8-4.9
Macro Focus Range	1cm	3cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	230k dots	920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	No	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	4.40 m	7.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Max Flash Sync	s	n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	12.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1280 x 720	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	Motion JPEG	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	120g	206g
Dimensions	96 x 57 x 19mm	100 x 59 x 33mm
Battery Life	160 shots	240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction