CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Olympus SZ-30MR

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

Olympus SZ-30MR
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus VG-160

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

Olympus VG-160
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras by Olympus. Olympus SZ-30MR was introduced to market in March 2011 and Olympus VG-160 was launched in January 2012. There is only 10 months difference between SZ-30MR and VG-160 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Olympus SZ-30MR has a 16.0 MP and Olympus VG-160 has a 14.0 MP resolution.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Olympus SZ-30MR Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2011-03-02
  • 16MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 25-600 mm F3.0-6.9 Zoom Lens
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 2 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 226g. 106 x 69 x 40 mm

Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2012-01-10
  • 14MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 26-130 mm F2.8-6.5 Zoom Lens
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • Unknown continuous shooting
  • HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution
  • 125g. 96 x 57 x 19 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Olympus SZ-30MR over Olympus VG-160
Image Stabilization
Sensor-shift vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Max Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 14 MP 14% more pixels
Max ISO
3.200 vs 1.600 100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution
460k dots vs 230k dots 100% higher resolution screen
Battery Life
220 shots vs 165 shots 55 more frames with a single charge
Focal Length - Wide
25mm vs 26mm 1 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
600mm vs 130mm 470 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
24× vs 5× more flexible focal coverage
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 Higher Resolution Video


Reasons to choose Olympus VG-160 over Olympus SZ-30MR
Max Mech. Shutter
1/2000s vs 1/1700s faster mechanical shutter
Weight
125 g vs 226 g 101 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
2.80 vs 3.00 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
6.50 vs 6.90 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
2.04µm2 vs 1.76µm2 15% larger pixel area

Common Strengths of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs Yes very handy for portraits
Common Weaknesses of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support
No vs No Lower image quality
LCD Screen Resolution
460k dots vs 230k dots Low resolution screens
Continuous Shooting
2.0fps vs fps Slow shooting speeds
Manual Focusing
No vs No No manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
No vs No No manual exposure control
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Max Aperture - Tele
6.90 vs 6.50 Slow lenses at tele
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Olympus SZ-30MR has external dimensions of 106 x 69 x 40 mm (4.17 x 2.72 x 1.57″) and weighs 226 g (0.50 lb / 7.97 oz) (including batteries). Olympus VG-160 has external dimensions of 96 x 57 x 19 mm (3.78 x 2.24 x 0.75″) and weighs 125 g (0.28 lb / 4.41 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160. Olympus VG-160 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 10mm narrower, 12mm shorter and 21mm thinner than Olympus SZ-30MR.

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Olympus VG-160 is significantly lighter (101g ) than the Olympus SZ-30MR which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Olympus SZ-30MR nor Olympus VG-160 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160: Sensor Comparison

Olympus SZ-30MR has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features TruePic III+ processor. On the other hand, Olympus VG-160 has a 14.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Below you can see the SZ-30MR and VG-160 sensor size comparison.

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 Cameras


Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Olympus VG-160 has 15% larger pixel area (2.04µm2 vs 1.76µm2) compared to Olympus SZ-30MR, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160 Lens Specs Comparison

Olympus SZ-30MR features a 25-600 mm F3.0-6.9 24× zoom lens whereas Olympus VG-160 features a 26-130 mm F2.8-6.5 5× zoom lens.

Olympus SZ-30MR has 1mm wider coverage than the Olympus VG-160. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f2.80, Olympus VG-160 is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Olympus SZ-30MR has 470mm longer reach than the Olympus VG-160. However, with a max aperture of f6.50, Olympus VG-160 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

SZ-30MR
VG-160
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Olympus SZ-30MR for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus VG-160 for Portrait Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Olympus SZ-30MR for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus VG-160 for Street Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Olympus SZ-30MR for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus VG-160 for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
600 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1700s
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 220 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.90
Read the details
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
130 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 165 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.50
Read the details

Olympus SZ-30MR for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus VG-160 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
Compact Body
226g
24.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Body Thickness 40mm
Read the details
Compact Body
125g
Body Thickness 19mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Olympus SZ-30MR for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus VG-160 for Landscape Photography

POOR
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Olympus SZ-30MR vs Olympus VG-160: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Olympus SZ-30MR and Olympus VG-160 scores compare:

Olympus SZ-30MR
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #213 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #790 out of 1223 in all Cameras
Olympus VG-160
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #408 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1095 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Olympus SZ-30MR is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Olympus VG-160 in all criteria except one: Portability. But the size difference between these cameras are negligible in real world so it is not a big disadvantage for Olympus SZ-30MR.

Olympus SZ-30MR
Olympus SZ-30MR
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus VG-160
Olympus VG-160
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus VG-160 vs Olympus SZ-30MR Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Olympus SZ-30MR Olympus VG-160
Brand Olympus Olympus
Announced 2011-03-02 2012-01-10
Body Type Compact Compact
Sensor
Type CMOS CCD
Size 1/2.3-inch 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Max Resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max Native Light sensitivity 3,200 ISO 1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 25-600 mm (24×) 26-130 mm (5×)
Max Aperture F3.0-6.9 F2.8-6.5
Macro Focus Range 1cm 7cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3" 3"
Resolution 460k dots 230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1700s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 4.00 m 4.80 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 2.0 fps n/a
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 1280 x 720
Video Formats MPEG-4 Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi Connected None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 226g 125g
Dimensions 106 x 69 x 40mm 96 x 57 x 19mm
Battery Life 220 shots 165 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction