CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
    • All Cameras
    • Cameras by Brand
      • Sony Cameras
      • Canon Cameras
      • Nikon Cameras
      • Pentax Cameras
      • Fujifilm Cameras
      • Olympus Cameras
      • OM-System Cameras
      • Panasonic Cameras
      • Leica Cameras
    • Cameras by Body Type
      • Mirrorless Cameras
      • DSLR Cameras
      • Compact Cameras
      • Bridge Cameras
      • Waterproof Cameras
    • Cameras by Lens Mount
      • Sony E Mount Cameras
      • Canon RF Mount Cameras
      • Nikon Z Mount Cameras
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cameras
      • Leica L Mount Cameras
      • Nikon F Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF M Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF S Mount Cameras
      • Pentax KAF Mount Cameras
      • Sony Alpha Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm G Mount Cameras
      • Sigma SA Mount Cameras
      • Nikon 1 Mount Cameras
  • LENSES
    • All Lenses
    • Lenses by Mount
      • Sony E Mount Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF M Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF S Mount Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Lenses
      • Pentax KAF Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm G Mount Lenses
      • Sigma SA Mount Lenses
      • Sony Alpha Mount Lenses
    • Teleconverters
    • Cinema Lenses
      • Sony E Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Cine Lenses
      • ARRI PL Mount Cine Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cine Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cine Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Cine Lenses
  • TOOLS
    • Cameras
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Lenses
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
  • BLOG

Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Nikon D3400

24 MP | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) CMOS Sensor

Nikon D3400
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Olympus SP-565UZ

10 MP | 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) CCD Sensor

Olympus SP-565UZ
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Nikon D3400, which was introduced in August 2016 is a Entry-Level DSLR camera with a 24.0MP APS-C sensor whereas Olympus SP-565UZ, which was introduced in January 2009 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, SP-565UZ is 7 years older than D3400. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Comparing a DSLR camera to a Fixed Lens camera is not an easy task but we will do our best to make this a fair comparison.

Here is a brief look at the main features of the Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon D3400 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2016-08-17
  • 24MP - APS-C CMOS Sensor
  • No Anti-aliasing (AA) filter
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • Optical (pentamirror) viewfinder
  • 5.0fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 395g. 124 x 98 x 76 mm
  • Replaced Nikon D3300 Compare

Olympus SP-565UZ Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-01-15
  • 10MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • 26-520 mm F2.8-4.5 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 2.50" Fixed Type Screen
  • Electronic viewfinder
  • 1.0fps continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 413g. 116 x 84 x 81 mm

Nikon D3400 was replaced by Nikon D3500. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon D3500 vs Nikon D3400
Nikon D3500 vs Olympus SP-565UZ

Let's read on in the following sections in order to better understand in detail how the Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ compare and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.


Related Blog Posts

Top 10 Lightest Full-Frame Mirrorless Cameras in 2023
The Most Rented Compact Cameras in 2022
DPReview to Close
Daily Deals: Sirui Anamorphic Lens, Apple MacBook Air and more
100-400mm Lens Size Comparison: Leica vs Sony vs Canon vs Nikon
Sirui 24mm f2.8 Super35 Anamorphic 1.33x Lens %50 Off
Nikon Z9 firmware Update v3.10 Released
Best Selling Lenses in Micro Four Thirds, Fujifilm X and Canon EF Mounts in 2023


**This post contains affiliate links, and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Nikon D3400 over Olympus SP-565UZ
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Sensor Resolution
24 MP vs 10 MP 140% more pixels
Max ISO
25.600 vs 6.400 300% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3 vs 2.5" 0.5 inches larger display
LCD Resolution
921k dots vs 230k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/4000s vs 1/2000s faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting
5.0fps vs 1.0fps 4 fps faster
Weight
395 g vs 413 g 18 g lighter
Flash Coverage
7.0m vs 6.4m 0.6m longer range
Color Depth
24.8 vs 18.7 higher color depth
Dynamic Range
13.9 vs 10.1 higher dynamic range
Low Light ISO
1192 vs 68 better High ISO performance
Sensor Pixel Area
15.28µm2 vs 2.78µm2 449% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
Bluetooth
Yes vs No Connect your camera to other devices via Blueetooth
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone
UHS Card Support
UHS-I vs none Read/Write in High Speeds
CHECK D3400 PRICE


Reasons to choose Olympus SP-565UZ over Nikon D3400
In-built Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
Internal Storage
48 MB vs None Extra built-in storage
Number of Focus Points
143 vs 11 132 more focus points
CHECK SP-565UZ PRICE

Common Strengths of Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs Yes Better for flash photography
Viewfinder
Yes (Optical) vs Yes (Electronic) Better framing and control
RAW Support
Yes vs Yes Better image quality
Common Weaknesses of Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No Screen tilts or Flips out independently, perfect for both stills and video
LCD Screen Size
2.50" vs 2.50" Small display
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
AE Bracketing
No vs No Not good for multi-exposure HDR
Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ: Physical Specs and Body Features Comparison

Size and weight are big decision factors when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, we are going to illustrate the Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon D3400 has external dimensions of 124 x 98 x 76 mm (4.88 x 3.86 x 2.99″) and weighs 395 g (0.87 lb / 13.93 oz) (including batteries). Olympus SP-565UZ has external dimensions of 116 x 84 x 81 mm (4.57 x 3.31 x 3.19″) and weighs 413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front-view size comparison of the Nikon D3400 and the Olympus SP-565UZ. Olympus SP-565UZ is 8mm narrower and 14mm shorter than Nikon D3400 but it is also 5mm thicker. As you can tell, actually this is not a fair size comparison since Olympus SP-565UZ has a built-in lens but Nikon D3400 doesn't. Once you put a lens on D3400, its thickness will increase significantly.

Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of the Nikon D3400 and the Olympus SP-565UZ Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of the Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ.

Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of the Nikon D3400 and the Olympus SP-565UZ Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ.
Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of the Nikon D3400 and the the Olympus SP-565UZ Size

Weight is another important factor, especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon D3400 is 18g lighter than the Olympus SP-565UZ but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Again, this comparison may not be very useful in real life as we are comparing the weight of a camera with a built-in lens to the body-only weight of an interchangeable lens camera. Once you put a lens on D3400, the total kit will weigh much higher.

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither the Nikon D3400 nor Olympus SP-565UZ provides any type of weather sealing in their bodies, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top DSLR Cameras with Weather Sealing
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon D3400's 3.00" LCD screen is slightly larger than Olympus SP-565UZ's 2.5" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.


Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ: Sensor Comparison

Nikon D3400 has a 24.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features Expeed 4 processor. On the other hand, Olympus SP-565UZ has a 10.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.08 x 4.56 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Nikon D3400's sensor provides 14MP more than Olympus SP-565UZ's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Another difference between these two cameras is that Nikon D3400's sensor lacks anti-alias (Low-Pass) filter. Removing anti-alias filter increases the sharpness and level of detail but at the same time, it increases the chance of moiré occurring in certain scenes.

Below you can see the D3400 and SP-565UZ sensor size comparison.

Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ Cameras


As seen above, Nikon D3400 has a 13.2x Larger sensor area than Olympus SP-565UZ. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

DxOMark Sensor Scores

Both Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ sensors have been tested by DxoMark. DxoMark scores camera sensors for color depth (DXO Portrait), dynamic range (DXO Landscape) and low-light sensitivity (DXO Sports), and also gives them an overall score. Of the two cameras that we are comparing, D3400 has scored 86, 56 points higher than SP-565UZ.

Model Overall Color Depth Dynamic Range Low-light ISO
Nikon D3400 86 24.8 bits 13.9 Evs 1192 ISO
Olympus SP-565UZ 30 18.7 bits 10.1 Evs 68 ISO
What types of Photography are Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon D3400 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus SP-565UZ for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 24.0MP
Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
No Image Stabilization
Read the details
Image Stabilization
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon D3400 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus SP-565UZ for Street Photography

GOOD
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
No Image Stabilization
Large Body
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
Read the details

Nikon D3400 for Sports Photography

GOOD

Olympus SP-565UZ for Sports Photography

POOR
Optical Built-in Viewfinder
Good Ergonomics&Handling
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
1 Cross Type Focus sensors
11 Focus Points
Good Battery Life: 1200 shots
Good Low Light ISO
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
No Image Stabilization
Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Image Stabilization
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
143 Focus Points
520 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon D3400 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus SP-565UZ for Daily Photography

GOOD
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Large Body
395g
Body Thickness 76mm
Read the details
Compact Body
20.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
413g
Body Thickness 81mm
Read the details

Nikon D3400 for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus SP-565UZ for Landscape Photography

POOR
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 24.0MP
Live-view
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon D3400 vs Olympus SP-565UZ: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far, but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon D3400 and Olympus SP-565UZ scores compare:

Nikon D3400
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #31 out of 80 in Compact SLR cameras
Ranked #267 out of 1259 in all Cameras
Olympus SP-565UZ
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #117 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #643 out of 1259 in all Cameras

Nikon D3400 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Olympus SP-565UZ in all criteria except one: Portability. But the size difference between these cameras are negligible in real world so it is not a big disadvantage for Nikon D3400.

Nikon D3400
Nikon D3400
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus SP-565UZ
Olympus SP-565UZ
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Nikon D3400 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Nikon D3400 Olympus SP-565UZ
Brand Nikon Olympus
Announced 2016-08-17 2009-01-15
Body Type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor
Type CMOS CCD
Size APS-C 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 23.5 x 15.6 mm 6.08 x 4.56 mm
Area 366.60mm2 27.72mm2
Megapixels 24 megapixels 10 megapixels
Max Resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Max Native Light sensitivity 25,600 ISO 6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 64 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 11 143
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount Nikon F fixed lens
Lens Focal Range no lens 26-520 mm (20×)
Max Aperture no lens F2.8-4.5
Macro Focus Range no lens 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3.00" 2.50"
Resolution 921k dots 230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder Coverage 95% n/a
Viewfinder Magnification 0.56x n/a
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/4000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization No Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 7.00 m (at ISO 100) 6.40 m (ISO 200)
Max Flash Sync 1/200s n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 5.0 fps 1.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 640 x 480
Video Formats MPEG-4, H.264 n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Optional None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 395g 413g
Dimensions 124 x 98 x 76mm 116 x 84 x 81mm
Battery Life 1200 shots n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS Optional None
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score 86 30
DxO Color Depth 24.8 18.7
DxO Dynamic Range 13.9 10.1
DxO Low Light ISO 1192 68
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Sony A7 IV
33 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7R IV
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon R3
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Nikon Z9
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Fujifilm X-T30 II
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Nikon Z5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Latest Cameras
Canon R50
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon R8
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Panasonic S5 II X
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Panasonic S5 II
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Pentax KF
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Fujifilm X-T5
40 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R6 II
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A7R V
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Copyright © 2023 by CameraDecision
Privacy About Contact Us SpeakerDecision

Report a Correction