Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon S9100

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Olympus TG-830 iHS

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Nikon S9100, which was introduced in July 2011 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Olympus TG-830 iHS, which was introduced in January 2013 is a Waterproof camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. There is 18 months difference between S9100 and TG-830 iHS so we don't expect to see a huge technology difference between these two cameras but it would still give an advantage to younger TG-830 iHS, especially in sensor tech.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon S9100 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-07-19

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

25-450 mm F3.5-5.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

10 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

240fps High-Speed Video

214g. 105 x 62 x 35 mm

Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-01-08

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

28-140 mm F3.9-5.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

Unknown continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

240fps High-Speed Video

Built-in GPS

214g. 109 x 67 x 28 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Nikon S9100 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix S9300. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix S9300 vs Nikon Coolpix S9100
Nikon Coolpix S9300 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix S9100 over Olympus TG-830 iHS

LCD Screen Resolution	921k dots vs 460k dots	100% higher resolution screen
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 28mm	3 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele	450mm vs 140mm	310 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	18× vs 5×	more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	3.50 vs 3.90	faster lens at wide
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area

Reasons to choose Olympus TG-830 iHS over Nikon Coolpix S9100

GPS	BuiltIn vs None	track your location
Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Max ISO	6.400 vs 3.200	100% higher Max ISO
Battery Life	300 shots vs 270 shots	30 more frames with a single charge
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS

Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift vs Sensor-shift	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Manual Exposure	No vs No	No manual exposure control
Max Aperture - Tele	5.90 vs 5.90	Slow lenses at tele

Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon S9100 has external dimensions of 105 x 62 x 35 mm (4.13 x 2.44 x 1.38″) and weighs 214 g (0.47 lb / 7.55 oz) (including batteries). Olympus TG-830 iHS has external dimensions of 109 x 67 x 28 mm (4.29 x 2.64 x 1.1″) and weighs 214 g (0.47 lb / 7.55 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS. Nikon S9100 is 4mm narrower and 5mm shorter than Olympus TG-830 iHS but it is also 7mm thicker.

Comparison image of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS.

Comparison image of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS have exactly the same weight of 214g.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS: Sensor Comparison

Nikon S9100 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Olympus TG-830 iHS has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the S9100 and TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS Cameras

Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Nikon S9100 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Olympus TG-830 iHS, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon S9100 features a 25-450 mm F3.5-5.9 18× zoom lens whereas Olympus TG-830 iHS features a 28-140 mm F3.9-5.9 5× zoom lens.

Nikon S9100 has 3mm wider coverage than the Olympus TG-830 iHS. At f3.50, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Nikon S9100 has 310mm longer reach than the Olympus TG-830 iHS. Both cameras has a max aperture of f5.90 at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

S9100

TG-830 iHS

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon S9100 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-830 iHS for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon S9100 for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-830 iHS for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.90
Read the details

Nikon S9100 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-830 iHS for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 10.0fps
450 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 270 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Environmental Sealings
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details

Nikon S9100 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-830 iHS for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
214g
18.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
214g
Environmental Sealings
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon S9100 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-830 iHS for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Environmental Sealings
Built-in GPS
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Nikon S9100 vs Olympus TG-830 iHS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon S9100 and Olympus TG-830 iHS scores compare:

Nikon S9100

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #174 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #727 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-830 iHS

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #107 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #585 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-830 iHS has a higher Overall Score than the Nikon S9100 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Nikon S9100 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix S9100	Olympus TG-830 iHS
Brand	Nikon	Olympus
Announced	2011-07-19	2013-01-08
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	25-450 mm (18×)	28-140 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.9	F3.9-5.9
Macro Focus Range	4cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	921k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	4.00 m	n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	10.0 fps	n/a
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	214g	214g
Dimensions	105 x 62 x 35mm	109 x 67 x 28mm
Battery Life	270 shots	300 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	Built-in
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction