Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon S6100

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung WB250F

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Nikon and Samsung. Nikon S6100 was introduced to market in February 2011 and Samsung WB250F was launched in January 2013. There is 23 months difference between S6100 and WB250F so we don't expect to see a huge technology difference between these two cameras but it would still give an advantage to younger WB250F, especially in sensor tech.

Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon S6100 has a 16.0 MP and Samsung WB250F has a 14.0 MP resolution.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon S6100 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-02-09

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

28-196 mm F3.7-5.6 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

1 fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

175g. 98 x 58 x 27 mm

Samsung WB250F Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-01-07

14MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 3200

24-432 mm F3.2-5.8 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

8 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

226g. 106 x 62 x 22 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix S6100 over Samsung WB250F

Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 14 MP	14% more pixels
Weight	175 g vs 226 g	51 g lighter
Max Aperture - Tele	5.60 vs 5.80	faster lens at tele

Reasons to choose Samsung WB250F over Nikon Coolpix S6100

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs None	Better connectivity
Continuous Shooting	8.0fps vs 1.0fps	7 fps faster
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 28mm	4 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele	432mm vs 196mm	236 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	18× vs 7×	more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	3.20 vs 3.70	faster lens at wide
Sensor Pixel Area	2.01µm² vs 1.76µm²	14% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix S6100 and Samsung WB250F

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Optical	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Touch Screen	Yes vs Yes	Easy control of camera functions
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix S6100 and Samsung WB250F

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
LCD Screen Resolution	460k dots vs 460k dots	Low resolution screens
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

New4

Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon S6100 has external dimensions of 98 x 58 x 27 mm (3.86 x 2.28 x 1.06″) and weighs 175 g (0.39 lb / 6.17 oz) (including batteries). Samsung WB250F has external dimensions of 106 x 62 x 22 mm (4.17 x 2.44 x 0.87″) and weighs 226 g (0.50 lb / 7.97 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F. Nikon S6100 is 8mm narrower and 4mm shorter than Samsung WB250F but it is also 5mm thicker.

Comparison image of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F.

Comparison image of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon S6100 is significantly lighter (51g ) than the Samsung WB250F which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix S6100 nor Samsung WB250F provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F: Sensor Comparison

Nikon S6100 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Samsung WB250F has a 14.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the S6100 and WB250F sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F Cameras

Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Samsung WB250F has 14% larger pixel area (2.01µm² vs 1.76µm²) compared to Nikon S6100, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon S6100 features a 28-196 mm F3.7-5.6 7× zoom lens whereas Samsung WB250F features a 24-432 mm F3.2-5.8 18× zoom lens.

Samsung WB250F has 4mm wider coverage than the Nikon S6100. At f3.20, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Samsung WB250F has 236mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon S6100. However, with a max aperture of f5.60, Nikon S6100 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

S6100

WB250F

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon S6100 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung WB250F for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon S6100 for Street Photography

GOOD

Samsung WB250F for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.70
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Nikon S6100 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung WB250F for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
196 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 210 shots
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 8.0fps
Wireless Connection
432 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.80
Read the details

Nikon S6100 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung WB250F for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
175g
7.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
226g
Body Thickness 22mm
18.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon S6100 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung WB250F for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon S6100 vs Samsung WB250F: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon S6100 and Samsung WB250F scores compare:

Nikon S6100

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #184 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #749 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Samsung WB250F

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #152 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #671 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Samsung WB250F has a higher Overall Score than the Nikon S6100 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Samsung WB250F vs Nikon S6100 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix S6100	Samsung WB250F
Brand	Nikon	Samsung
Announced	2011-02-09	2013-01-07
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	CCD	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	16 megapixels	14 megapixels
Max Resolution	4608 x 3456	4320 x 3240
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	80 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	28-196 mm (7×)	24-432 mm (18×)
Max Aperture	F3.7-5.6	F3.2-5.8
Macro Focus Range	3cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	460k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	4.50 m	n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	1.0 fps	8.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1280 x 720	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, Motion JPEG	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	175g	226g
Dimensions	98 x 58 x 27mm	106 x 62 x 22mm
Battery Life	210 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction