CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Nikon P300
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Sigma DP2 Quattro

20 MP | APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor

Sigma DP2 Quattro
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Nikon and Sigma. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Sigma DP2 Quattro was launched in February 2014. As you can see, P300 is 3 years older than DP2 Quattro. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Sigma DP2 Quattro has a 20.0MP APS-C sensor.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2011-05-31
  • 12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 160 - 3200
  • 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 7 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 120fps High-Speed Video
  • 189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2014-02-13
  • 20MP - APS-C CMOS (Foveon X3) Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 45 mm f2.80 Prime Lens
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 3 fps continuous shooting
  • No Video Mode
  • 395g. 161 x 67 x 82 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Sigma DP2 Quattro
Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash
Yes vs No Useful in low-light
Continuous Shooting
7.0fps vs 3.0fps 4 fps faster
Weight
189 g vs 395 g 206 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 45mm 21 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
100mm vs 45mm 55 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
4.2× vs 1× more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
1.80 vs 2.80 faster lens at wide
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs None Higher Resolution Video


Reasons to choose Sigma DP2 Quattro over Nikon Coolpix P300
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs No Better for flash photography
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Max Sensor Resolution
20 MP vs 12 MP 66% more pixels
Max ISO
6.400 vs 3.200 100% higher Max ISO
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Max Aperture - Tele
2.80 vs 4.90 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
18.81µm2 vs 2.34µm2 703% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs Yes very handy for portraits
LCD Screen Resolution
922k dots vs 920k dots High resolution screens
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Sigma DP2 Quattro has external dimensions of 161 x 67 x 82 mm (6.34 x 2.64 x 3.23″) and weighs 395 g (0.87 lb / 13.93 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. Nikon P300 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 58mm narrower, 9mm shorter and 50mm thinner than Sigma DP2 Quattro.

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro.

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro.
Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon P300 is significantly lighter (206g ) than the Sigma DP2 Quattro which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Sigma DP2 Quattro provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Sigma DP2 Quattro has a 20.0MP APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm ) sized CMOS (Foveon X3) sensor and features TRUE III engine processor.

Sigma DP2 Quattro's sensor provides 8MP more than Nikon P300's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the P300 and DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison.

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro Cameras


As seen above, Sigma DP2 Quattro has a 13.1x Larger sensor area than Nikon P300. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Sigma DP2 Quattro features a 45 mm F2.8 Prime lens.

It is not easy to compare a prime lens with a zoom lens. Nikon P300's zoom lens provides a great flexibility compared to Sigma DP2 Quattro's 45mm fixed focal length lens. On the other hand, DP2 Quattro's prime lens makes it a specialized camera. You compromise the flexibility of a zoom in order to enjoy the high image quality and unique rendering of this fast lens. On the tele end, Nikon P300 has 55mm longer reach than the Sigma DP2 Quattro. However, with a max aperture of f2.80, Sigma DP2 Quattro is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Large Sensor Compact Cameras

P300
DP2 Quattro
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Street Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
45 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
45 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
395g
Body Thickness 82mm
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Sigma DP2 Quattro for Landscape Photography

AVERAGE
Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Large APS-C (23.5 x 15.7 mm) sensor
Very High Resolution Sensor: 20.0MP
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
45 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Sigma DP2 Quattro scores compare:

Nikon P300
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras
Sigma DP2 Quattro
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #45 out of 61 in Large sensor compact cameras
Ranked #466 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Sigma DP2 Quattro scores higher than the Nikon P300 in Overall. It has better image quality and better value than Nikon P300. On the other hand, Nikon P300 is more portable and has more features than Sigma DP2 Quattro.
If image quality is very important for you and you want to get the most bang for your bucks, choose the Sigma DP2 Quattro.
If you are looking for a small camera where you can take everywhere with you, and having more features are also important, Nikon P300 is the right choice for you.

Nikon P300
Nikon P300
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Sigma DP2 Quattro
Sigma DP2 Quattro
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Sigma DP2 Quattro vs Nikon P300 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Nikon Coolpix P300 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Brand Nikon Sigma
Announced 2011-05-31 2014-02-13
Body Type Compact Large sensor compact
Sensor
Type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Size 1/2.3-inch APS-C
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 23.5 x 15.7 mm
Area 28.07mm2 368.95mm2
Megapixels 12 megapixels 20 megapixels
Max Resolution 4000 x 3000 5424 x 3616
Max Native Light sensitivity 3,200 ISO 6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 160 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 9 9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 24-100 mm (4.2×) 45 mm (1×)
Max Aperture F1.8-4.9 F2.8
Macro Focus Range 3cm n/a
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3" 3"
Resolution 922k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/2000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization Optical No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 6.50 m no built-in flash
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 7.0 fps 3.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 None
Video Formats H.264, Motion JPEG n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 189g 395g
Dimensions 103 x 58 x 32mm 161 x 67 x 82mm
Battery Life 240 shots n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction