Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Samsung MV800

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing P300 and MV800, two Small Sensor Compact cameras from Nikon and Samsung. Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon P300 has a 12.0 MP and Samsung MV800 has a 16.0 MP resolution. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Samsung MV800 was launched in September 2011. There is only 3 months difference between P300 and MV800 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-05-31

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

120fps High-Speed Video

189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Samsung MV800 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-09-01

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

26-130 mm F3.3-5.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Tilting Screen

continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

121g. 92 x 56 x 10 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Samsung MV800

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Samsung MV800

LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 460k dots	100% higher resolution screen
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 26mm	2 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.30	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.90	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	6.5m vs 3.2m	3.3m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video

Reasons to choose Samsung MV800 over Nikon Coolpix P300

LCD Screen	Tilting vs Fixed Type	Flexible shooting positions
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Weight	121 g vs 189 g	68 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	130mm vs 100mm	30 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5× vs 4.2×	more flexible focal coverage

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Samsung MV800

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Optical	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Samsung MV800

External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Manual Focusing	No vs No	No manual focusing modes
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Samsung MV800 has external dimensions of 92 x 56 x 10 mm (3.62 x 2.21 x 0.41″) and weighs 121 g (0.27 lb / 4.27 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800. Samsung MV800 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 11mm narrower, 2mm shorter and 22mm thinner than Nikon P300.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Samsung MV800 is significantly lighter (68g ) than the Nikon P300 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Samsung MV800 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

On the other hand, Samsung MV800 features a Tilting screen where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels whereas the Nikon P300 has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to MV800.

Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Samsung MV800 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Below you can see the P300 and MV800 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 Cameras

Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Nikon P300 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Samsung MV800, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800 Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Samsung MV800 features a 26-130 mm F3.3-5.9 5× zoom lens.

Nikon P300 has 2mm wider coverage than the Samsung MV800. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Samsung MV800 has 30mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon P300. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Nikon P300 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

P300

MV800

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Samsung MV800 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Samsung MV800 for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Samsung MV800 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
130 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Samsung MV800 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
121g
Body Thickness 10mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Samsung MV800 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Samsung MV800: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Samsung MV800 scores compare:

Nikon P300

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Samsung MV800

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #219 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #794 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Nikon P300 has a higher Overall Score than the Samsung MV800 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Samsung MV800 vs Nikon P300 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix P300	Samsung MV800
Brand	Nikon	Samsung
Announced	2011-05-31	2011-09-01
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-100 mm (4.2×)	26-130 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F1.8-4.9	F3.3-5.9
Macro Focus Range	3cm	n/a
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Tilting
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	922k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	6.50 m	3.20 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	7.0 fps	n/a
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1280 x 720
Video Formats	H.264, Motion JPEG	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	189g	121g
Dimensions	103 x 58 x 32mm	92 x 56 x 10mm
Battery Life	240 shots	n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction