Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Olympus SZ-11

14 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Nikon and Olympus. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Olympus SZ-11 was launched in July 2011. There is only 2 months difference between P300 and SZ-11 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon P300 has a 12.0 MP and Olympus SZ-11 has a 14.0 MP resolution.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-05-31

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

120fps High-Speed Video

189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Olympus SZ-11 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-07-27

14MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 1600

25-500 mm F3.0-6.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

226g. 106 x 69 x 40 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Olympus SZ-11

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Olympus SZ-11

Max ISO	3.200 vs 1.600	100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 460k dots	100% higher resolution screen
Battery Life	240 shots vs 200 shots	40 more frames with a single charge
Weight	189 g vs 226 g	37 g lighter
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 25mm	1 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.00	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 6.90	faster lens at tele
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video

Reasons to choose Olympus SZ-11 over Nikon Coolpix P300

Max Sensor Resolution	14 MP vs 12 MP	16% more pixels
Focal Length - Tele	500mm vs 100mm	400 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	20× vs 4.2×	more flexible focal coverage
Flash Coverage	9.3m vs 6.5m	2.8m longer range

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Olympus SZ-11

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Sensor-shift	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
Continuous Shooting	7.0fps vs 7.0fps	Fast shooting speeds

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Olympus SZ-11

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Manual Focusing	No vs No	No manual focusing modes
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Olympus SZ-11 has external dimensions of 106 x 69 x 40 mm (4.17 x 2.72 x 1.57″) and weighs 226 g (0.50 lb / 7.97 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11. Nikon P300 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 3mm narrower, 11mm shorter and 8mm thinner than Olympus SZ-11.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon P300 is significantly lighter (37g ) than the Olympus SZ-11 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Olympus SZ-11 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Olympus SZ-11 has a 14.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features TruePic III+ processor.

Below you can see the P300 and SZ-11 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 Cameras

Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture.

Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11 Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Olympus SZ-11 features a 25-500 mm F3.0-6.9 20× zoom lens.

Nikon P300 has 1mm wider coverage than the Olympus SZ-11. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Olympus SZ-11 has 400mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon P300. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Nikon P300 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

P300

SZ-11

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus SZ-11 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus SZ-11 for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus SZ-11 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
500 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 200 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.90
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Olympus SZ-11 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
226g
20.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Body Thickness 40mm
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus SZ-11 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Olympus SZ-11: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Olympus SZ-11 scores compare:

Nikon P300

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Olympus SZ-11

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #230 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #819 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Nikon P300 has a higher Overall Score than the Olympus SZ-11 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Olympus SZ-11 vs Nikon P300 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix P300	Olympus SZ-11
Brand	Nikon	Olympus
Announced	2011-05-31	2011-07-27
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	14 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4288 x 3216
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-100 mm (4.2×)	25-500 mm (20×)
Max Aperture	F1.8-4.9	F3.0-6.9
Macro Focus Range	3cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	922k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	6.50 m	9.30 m (@ ISO 1600)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	7.0 fps	7.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1280 x 720
Video Formats	H.264, Motion JPEG	Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	189g	226g
Dimensions	103 x 58 x 32mm	106 x 69 x 40mm
Battery Life	240 shots	200 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction