Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Nikon S6200

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing P300 and S6200, two Small Sensor Compact cameras by Nikon. Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon P300 has a 12.0 MP and Nikon S6200 has a 16.0 MP resolution. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Nikon S6200 was launched in August 2011. There is only 3 months difference between P300 and S6200 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-05-31

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

120fps High-Speed Video

189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Nikon S6200 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-08-24

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

25-250 mm F3.2-5.6 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

2.7" Fixed Type Screen

1 fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

160g. 93 x 58 x 26 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix S6200

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Nikon Coolpix S6200

LCD Screen Size	3" vs 2.7"	0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 230k dots	300% higher resolution screen
Continuous Shooting	7.0fps vs 1.0fps	6 fps faster
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 25mm	1 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.20	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.60	faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix S6200 over Nikon Coolpix P300

Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Battery Life	250 shots vs 240 shots	10 more frames with a single charge
Weight	160 g vs 189 g	29 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	250mm vs 100mm	150 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	10× vs 4.2×	more flexible focal coverage

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Nikon Coolpix S6200

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Optical	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Nikon Coolpix S6200

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
LCD Screen Size	3" vs 2.7"	Small display
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

New4

Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Nikon S6200 has external dimensions of 93 x 58 x 26 mm (3.66 x 2.28 x 1.02″) and weighs 160 g (0.35 lb / 5.64 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200. Nikon P300 has the same height with Nikon S6200. On the other hand, with a width of 103mm, it is 10 wider and also with a thickness of 32mm, it is 6mm thicker than Nikon S6200.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon S6200 is significantly lighter (29g ) than the Nikon P300 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Nikon Coolpix S6200 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Nikon S6200's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Nikon S6200 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features Expeed C2 processor.

Below you can see the P300 and S6200 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 Cameras

Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Nikon P300 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Nikon S6200, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200 Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Nikon S6200 features a 25-250 mm F3.2-5.6 10× zoom lens.

Nikon P300 has 1mm wider coverage than the Nikon S6200. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Nikon S6200 has 150mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon P300. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Nikon P300 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

P300

S6200

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Nikon S6200 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Nikon S6200 for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Nikon S6200 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
250 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 250 shots
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Nikon S6200 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
160g
10.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Nikon S6200 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Nikon S6200: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Nikon S6200 scores compare:

Nikon P300

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Nikon S6200

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #220 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #798 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Nikon P300 has a higher Overall Score than the Nikon S6200 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Nikon S6200 vs Nikon P300 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix P300	Nikon Coolpix S6200
Brand	Nikon	Nikon
Announced	2011-05-31	2011-08-24
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-100 mm (4.2×)	25-250 mm (10×)
Max Aperture	F1.8-4.9	F3.2-5.6
Macro Focus Range	3cm	10cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	2.7"
Resolution	922k dots	230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	6.50 m	n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	7.0 fps	1.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1280 x 720
Video Formats	H.264, Motion JPEG	MPEG-4, Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	189g	160g
Dimensions	103 x 58 x 32mm	93 x 58 x 26mm
Battery Life	240 shots	250 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction