Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Canon SX700 HS

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two Compact cameras from Nikon and Canon. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Canon SX700 HS was launched in February 2014. As you can see, P300 is 3 years older than SX700 HS. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon P300 has a 12.0 MP and Canon SX700 HS has a 16.0 MP resolution.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-05-31

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

120fps High-Speed Video

189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Canon SX700 HS Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2014-02-12

16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 3200

25-750 mm F3.2-6.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

9 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

240fps High-Speed Video

Built-in Wireless

269g. 113 x 66 x 35 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Canon SX700 HS was replaced by Canon PowerShot SX710 HS. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
Canon PowerShot SX710 HS vs Nikon Coolpix P300

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Weight	189 g vs 269 g	80 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 25mm	1 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.20	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 6.90	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	6.5m vs 3.5m	3m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area

Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot SX700 HS over Nikon Coolpix P300

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs None	Better connectivity
Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Max Mech. Shutter	1/3200s vs 1/2000s	faster mechanical shutter
Continuous Shooting	9.0fps vs 7.0fps	2 fps faster
Battery Life	250 shots vs 240 shots	10 more frames with a single charge
Focal Length - Tele	750mm vs 100mm	650 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	30x vs 4.2×	more flexible focal coverage
NFC Connection	Yes vs No	Easy wireless connectivity with compatible devices

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Image Stabilization	Optical vs Optical	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 922k dots	High resolution screens
Manual Exposure	Yes vs Yes	better exposure control

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Canon PowerShot SX700 HS

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Canon SX700 HS has external dimensions of 113 x 66 x 35 mm (4.45 x 2.6 x 1.38″) and weighs 269 g (0.59 lb / 9.49 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS. Nikon P300 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 10mm narrower, 8mm shorter and 3mm thinner than Canon SX700 HS.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Nikon P300 is significantly lighter (80g ) than the Canon SX700 HS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Canon PowerShot SX700 HS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Canon SX700 HS has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Digic 6 processor.

Below you can see the P300 and SX700 HS sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS Cameras

Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Nikon P300 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Canon SX700 HS, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Canon SX700 HS features a 25-750 mm F3.2-6.9 30x zoom lens.

Nikon P300 has 1mm wider coverage than the Canon SX700 HS. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Canon SX700 HS has 650mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon P300. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Nikon P300 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

P300

SX700 HS

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Canon SX700 HS for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Canon SX700 HS for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon SX700 HS for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 9.0fps
Wireless Connection
750 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/3200s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 250 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.90
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Canon SX700 HS for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
269g
30.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Canon SX700 HS for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Canon SX700 HS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Canon SX700 HS scores compare:

Nikon P300

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Canon SX700 HS

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #59 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #488 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Canon SX700 HS is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Nikon P300 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Nikon P300. Otherwise, Canon SX700 HS is the better camera overall.

Canon SX700 HS vs Nikon P300 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix P300	Canon PowerShot SX700 HS
Brand	Nikon	Canon
Announced	2011-05-31	2014-02-12
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	3,200 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-100 mm (4.2×)	25-750 mm (30x)
Max Aperture	F1.8-4.9	F3.2-6.9
Macro Focus Range	3cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	922k dots	922k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/3200s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	6.50 m	3.50 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	7.0 fps	9.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	H.264, Motion JPEG	H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	189g	269g
Dimensions	103 x 58 x 32mm	113 x 66 x 35mm
Battery Life	240 shots	250 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction