Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Nikon P300

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Canon A2500

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing P300 and A2500, two Small Sensor Compact cameras from Nikon and Canon. Both cameras have 1/2.3-inch sensors but Nikon P300 has a 12.0 MP and Canon A2500 has a 16.0 MP resolution. Nikon P300 was introduced to market in May 2011 and Canon A2500 was launched in January 2013. There is 20 months difference between P300 and A2500 so we don't expect to see a huge technology difference between these two cameras but it would still give an advantage to younger A2500, especially in sensor tech.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Nikon P300 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2011-05-31

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 160 - 3200

24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

7 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

120fps High-Speed Video

189g. 103 x 58 x 32 mm

Canon A2500 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-01-29

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 100 - 1600

28-140 mm F2.8-6.9 Zoom Lens

3" Fixed Type Screen

1 fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

135g. 98 x 56 x 20 mm

Nikon P300 was replaced by Nikon Coolpix P310. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Nikon Coolpix P300
Nikon Coolpix P310 vs Canon PowerShot A2500

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Nikon Coolpix P300 over Canon PowerShot A2500

Image Stabilization	Optical vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Max ISO	3.200 vs 1.600	100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 230k dots	300% higher resolution screen
Continuous Shooting	7.0fps vs 1.0fps	6 fps faster
Battery Life	240 shots vs 220 shots	20 more frames with a single charge
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 28mm	4 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 2.80	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 6.90	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	6.5m vs 3.0m	3.5m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video

Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot A2500 over Nikon Coolpix P300

Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Weight	135 g vs 189 g	54 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	140mm vs 100mm	40 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5× vs 4.2×	more flexible focal coverage

Common Strengths of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Canon PowerShot A2500

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits

Common Weaknesses of Nikon Coolpix P300 and Canon PowerShot A2500

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support	No vs No	Lower image quality
Manual Focusing	No vs No	No manual focusing modes
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Nikon P300 has external dimensions of 103 x 58 x 32 mm (4.06 x 2.28 x 1.26″) and weighs 189 g (0.42 lb / 6.67 oz) (including batteries). Canon A2500 has external dimensions of 98 x 56 x 20 mm (3.86 x 2.2 x 0.79″) and weighs 135 g (0.30 lb / 4.76 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500. Canon A2500 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 5mm narrower, 2mm shorter and 12mm thinner than Nikon P300.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500.

Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500.

Top View Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Canon A2500 is significantly lighter (54g ) than the Nikon P300 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Nikon Coolpix P300 nor Canon PowerShot A2500 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Nikon P300 and Canon A2500's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500: Sensor Comparison

Nikon P300 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Expeed C2 processor. On the other hand, Canon A2500 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor .

Below you can see the P300 and A2500 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 Cameras

Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Nikon P300 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Canon A2500, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500 Lens Specs Comparison

Nikon P300 features a 24-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4.2× zoom lens whereas Canon A2500 features a 28-140 mm F2.8-6.9 5× zoom lens.

Nikon P300 has 4mm wider coverage than the Canon A2500. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Canon A2500 has 40mm longer telezoom reach than the Nikon P300. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Nikon P300 is faster at widest end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

P300

A2500

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Nikon P300 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Canon A2500 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Street Photography

GOOD

Canon A2500 for Street Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon A2500 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 7.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 1.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 220 shots
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.90
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Canon A2500 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Compact Body
189g
4.2X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Compact Body
135g
Body Thickness 20mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Nikon P300 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Canon A2500 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Nikon P300 vs Canon A2500: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Nikon P300 and Canon A2500, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Nikon P300 and Canon A2500 scores compare:

Nikon P300

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #177 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #732 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Canon A2500

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #395 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #1077 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Nikon P300 has a higher Overall Score than the Canon A2500 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Canon A2500 vs Nikon P300 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Nikon Coolpix P300	Canon PowerShot A2500
Brand	Nikon	Canon
Announced	2011-05-31	2013-01-29
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	BSI-CMOS	CCD
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	160 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	9	9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-100 mm (4.2×)	28-140 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F1.8-4.9	F2.8-6.9
Macro Focus Range	3cm	3cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	922k dots	230k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Optical	No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	6.50 m	3.00 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	7.0 fps	1.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1280 x 720
Video Formats	H.264, Motion JPEG	H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	189g	135g
Dimensions	103 x 58 x 32mm	98 x 56 x 20mm
Battery Life	240 shots	220 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction