Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Kodak M341

12 MP | 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Fujifilm XQ1

12 MP | 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Comparison Overview

In this review, we will be comparing M341 and XQ1, two Ultracompact cameras from Kodak and Fujifilm. Both cameras have 12.0MP sensors but Kodak M341's sensor is 1/2.3-inch sized whereas Fujifilm XQ1 has a 2/3-inch sensor. Kodak M341 was introduced to market in July 2009 and Fujifilm XQ1 was launched in November 2013. As you can see, M341 is 4 years older than XQ1. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Kodak M341 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2009-07-29

12MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 64 - 1600

35-175 mm F3.0-4.8 Zoom Lens

3" Fixed Type Screen

continuous shooting

- 640 x 480 video resolution

135g. 96 x 59 x 19 mm

Fujifilm XQ1 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-11-26

12MP - 2/3-inch CMOS X-TRANS II Sensor

ISO 100 - 12800

25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 Zoom Lens

Optical Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

12 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

206g. 100 x 59 x 33 mm

Fujifilm XQ1 was replaced by Fujifilm XQ2. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Fujifilm XQ1
Fujifilm XQ2 vs Kodak EasyShare M341

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Kodak EasyShare M341 over Fujifilm XQ1

Weight	135 g vs 206 g	71 g lighter
Focal Length - Tele	175mm vs 100mm	75 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	5× vs 4×	more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Tele	4.80 vs 4.90	faster lens at tele

Reasons to choose Fujifilm XQ1 over Kodak EasyShare M341

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs None	Better connectivity
Image Stabilization	Optical vs None	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max ISO	12.800 vs 1.600	700% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	920k dots vs 230k dots	300% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter	1/4000s vs 1/1400s	faster mechanical shutter
Manual Exposure	Yes vs No	better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 35mm	10 mm wider coverage
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.00	faster lens at wide
Flash Coverage	7.4m vs 3.2m	4.2m longer range
Sensor Pixel Area	4.84µm² vs 2.31µm²	109% larger pixel area
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480	Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

Common Strengths of Kodak EasyShare M341 and Fujifilm XQ1

Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Continuous Shooting	fps vs 12.0fps	Fast shooting speeds

Common Weaknesses of Kodak EasyShare M341 and Fujifilm XQ1

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Kodak M341 has external dimensions of 96 x 59 x 19 mm (3.78 x 2.32 x 0.75″) and weighs 135 g (0.30 lb / 4.76 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XQ1 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 33 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 1.3″) and weighs 206 g (0.45 lb / 7.27 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1. Kodak M341 is 4mm narrower and 14mm thinner than Kodak M341 but they have the same height of 59mm.

Comparison image of Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Kodak M341 is significantly lighter (71g ) than the Fujifilm XQ1 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Kodak EasyShare M341 nor Fujifilm XQ1 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1: Sensor Comparison

Both Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 have 12.0 MP resolution sensors but Kodak M341's sensor is 1/2.3-inch (6.08 x 4.56 mm ) and Fujifilm XQ1's sensor is 2/3-inch (8.8 x 6.6 mm ).

Since Fujifilm XQ1's has a larger sensor area with the same resolution, this means that it also has a larger pixel area hence better light collecting capacity for a given aperture compared to Kodak M341.

Below you can see the M341 and XQ1 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 Cameras

As seen above, Fujifilm XQ1 has a 2.1x Larger sensor area than Kodak M341. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1 Lens Specs Comparison

Kodak M341 features a 35-175 mm F3.0-4.8 5× zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XQ1 features a 25-100 mm F1.8-4.9 4× zoom lens.

Fujifilm XQ1 has 10mm wider coverage than the Kodak M341. At f1.80, it is also faster at widest end. On the tele end, Kodak M341 has 75mm longer reach than the Fujifilm XQ1. At f4.80, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

M341

XQ1

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Kodak M341 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Kodak M341 for Street Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Street Photography

GOOD

Small Body
Live-view
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Kodak M341 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Sports Photography

POOR

175 mm Tele Lens
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1400s
Focus Points
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 12.0fps
Fast Max shutter speed: 1/4000s
Wireless Connection
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Kodak M341 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XQ1 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
135g
Body Thickness 19mm
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
206g
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
Read the details

Kodak M341 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XQ1 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.33" (6.08 x 4.56 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
35 mm - Poor Wide Angle Coverage
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 2/3" (8.8 x 6.6 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Kodak M341 vs Fujifilm XQ1: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Kodak M341 and Fujifilm XQ1 scores compare:

Kodak M341

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #133 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1172 out of 1225 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ1

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #2 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #441 out of 1225 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XQ1 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Kodak M341 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Kodak M341. Otherwise, Fujifilm XQ1 is the better camera overall.

Fujifilm XQ1 vs Kodak M341 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Kodak EasyShare M341	Fujifilm XQ1
Brand	Kodak	Fujifilm
Announced	2009-07-29	2013-11-26
Body Type	Ultracompact	Ultracompact
Sensor
Type	CCD	CMOS X-TRANS II
Size	1/2.3-inch	2/3-inch
Dimensions	6.08 x 4.56 mm	8.8 x 6.6 mm
Area	27.72mm²	58.08mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	12 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity	1,600 ISO	12,800 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	64 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	n/a	n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	35-175 mm (5×)	25-100 mm (4×)
Max Aperture	F3.0-4.8	F1.8-4.9
Macro Focus Range	10cm	3cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	230k dots	920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/1400s	1/4000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	No	Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	3.20 m	7.40 m (at Auto ISO)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	n/a	12.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	640 x 480	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	Motion JPEG	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	135g	206g
Dimensions	96 x 59 x 19mm	100 x 59 x 33mm
Battery Life	n/a	240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction