CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Kodak M320

9 MP | 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) CCD Sensor

Kodak M320
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Fujifilm XP130

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Fujifilm XP130
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Kodak M320, which was introduced in January 2009 is a Ultracompact camera with a 9.0MP 1/2.5-inch sensor whereas Fujifilm XP130, which was introduced in January 2018 is a Waterproof camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, M320 is 9 years older than XP130. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Kodak M320 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-01-08
  • 9MP - 1/2.5-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 34-102 mm F2.8-5.1 Zoom Lens
  • 2.7" Fixed Type Screen
  • continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 155g. 97 x 60 x 21 mm

Fujifilm XP130 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2018-01-24
  • 16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 3200 ( expands to 6400)
  • 28-140 mm F3.9-4.9 Zoom Lens
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3" Fixed Type Screen
  • 10.0 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 207g. 110 x 71 x 28 mm
  • Weather Sealed Body
  • Replaced Fujifilm FinePix XP120 Compare

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Kodak EasyShare M320 over Fujifilm FinePix XP130
Weight
155 g vs 207 g 52 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
2.80 vs 3.90 faster lens at wide
Sensor Pixel Area
2.74µm2 vs 1.76µm2 55% larger pixel area


Reasons to choose Fujifilm FinePix XP130 over Kodak EasyShare M320
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
Image Stabilization
Sensor-shift vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 9 MP 77% more pixels
Max ISO
3.200 vs 1.600 100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
3" vs 2.7" 0.3 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
920k dots vs 230k dots 300% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/2000s vs 1/1400s faster mechanical shutter
Environmental Sealing
Yes vs No shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs No creative shooting
Focal Length - Wide
28mm vs 34mm 6 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
140mm vs 102mm 38 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
5x vs 3× more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Tele
4.90 vs 5.10 faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage
4.4m vs 3.0m 1.4m longer range
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
Bluetooth
Yes vs No Connect your camera to other devices via Blueetooth
Smartphone Remote
Yes vs No Remote control your camera with a smartphone

Common Strengths of Kodak EasyShare M320 and Fujifilm FinePix XP130
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Continuous Shooting
fps vs 10.0fps Fast shooting speeds
Common Weaknesses of Kodak EasyShare M320 and Fujifilm FinePix XP130
Fixed Screen
Fixed Type vs No No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe
No vs No Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder
None vs None No eye-level shooting option
RAW Support
No vs No Lower image quality
Manual Exposure
No vs No No manual exposure control
New4
Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Kodak M320 has external dimensions of 97 x 60 x 21 mm (3.82 x 2.36 x 0.83″) and weighs 155 g (0.34 lb / 5.47 oz) (including batteries). Fujifilm XP130 has external dimensions of 110 x 71 x 28 mm (4.33 x 2.8 x 1.1″) and weighs 207 g (0.46 lb / 7.30 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130. Kodak M320 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 13mm narrower, 11mm shorter and 7mm thinner than Fujifilm XP130.

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130.

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Kodak M320 is significantly lighter (52g ) than the Fujifilm XP130 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

M320
XP130
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

M320
XP130
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Fujifilm XP130's 3" LCD screen is slightly larger than Kodak M320's 2.7" screen.

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.
Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130: Sensor Comparison

Kodak M320 has a 9.0MP 1/2.5-inch (5.744 x 4.308 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Fujifilm XP130 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor .

Fujifilm XP130's sensor provides 7MP more than Kodak M320's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the M320 and XP130 sensor size comparison.

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 Cameras


As seen above, Fujifilm XP130 has a 1.1x Larger sensor area than Kodak M320. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130 Lens Specs Comparison

Kodak M320 features a 34-102 mm F2.8-5.1 3× zoom lens whereas Fujifilm XP130 features a 28-140 mm F3.9-4.9 5x zoom lens.

Fujifilm XP130 has 6mm wider coverage than the Kodak M320. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f2.80, Kodak M320 is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Fujifilm XP130 has 38mm longer reach than the Kodak M320. At f4.90, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

M320
XP130
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

M320
XP130
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

M320
XP130
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

M320
XP130
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Kodak M320 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP130 for Portrait Photography

POOR
Small 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 9.0MP
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Kodak M320 for Street Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP130 for Street Photography

GOOD
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.80
34 mm - Not so Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.90
Read the details

Kodak M320 for Sports Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP130 for Sports Photography

POOR
25 Focus Points
No Image Stabilization
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1400s
102 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 10.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Wireless Connection
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
140 mm Tele Lens
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Focus Points
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
Read the details

Kodak M320 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Fujifilm XP130 for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
155g
Body Thickness 21mm
Small 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
3.0X Optical Zoom
Read the details
Compact Body
207g
Environmental Sealings
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

Kodak M320 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Fujifilm XP130 for Landscape Photography

POOR
34 mm - Not so Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.5" (5.744 x 4.308 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 9.0MP
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Kodak M320 vs Fujifilm XP130: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Kodak M320 and Fujifilm XP130 scores compare:

Kodak M320
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #141 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #1197 out of 1226 in all Cameras
Fujifilm XP130
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #1 out of 155 in Ultracompact cameras
Ranked #440 out of 1226 in all Cameras

Fujifilm XP130 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Kodak M320 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Kodak M320. Otherwise, Fujifilm XP130 is the better camera overall.

Kodak M320
Kodak M320
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm XP130
Fujifilm XP130
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Fujifilm XP130 vs Kodak M320 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Kodak EasyShare M320 Fujifilm FinePix XP130
Brand Kodak Fujifilm
Announced 2009-01-08 2018-01-24
Body Type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor
Type CCD BSI-CMOS
Size 1/2.5-inch 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 5.744 x 4.308 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 24.74mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 9 megapixels 16 megapixels
Max Resolution 3472 x 2604 4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity 1,600 ISO 3,200 ISO
Max Boosted Light Sensitivity - 6400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 80 ISO 100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points 25 n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 34-102 mm (3×) 28-140 mm (5x)
Max Aperture F2.8-5.1 F3.9-4.9
Macro Focus Range 10cm 9cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 2.7" 3"
Resolution 230k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1400s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization No Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 3.00 m 4.40 m (at Auto ISO)
Max Flash Sync s n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting n/a 10.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 640 x 480 1920 x 1080
Video Formats Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity None Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 155g 207g
Dimensions 97 x 60 x 21mm 110 x 71 x 28mm
Battery Life n/a 240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Compact Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Top Rated Waterproof Cameras
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $200
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $500
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $750
Top Waterproof Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Pentax K-m
10 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Pentax K-3 III
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Sigma fp L
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction