CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
    • All Cameras
    • Cameras by Brand
      • Sony Cameras
      • Canon Cameras
      • Nikon Cameras
      • Pentax Cameras
      • Fujifilm Cameras
      • Olympus Cameras
      • OM-System Cameras
      • Panasonic Cameras
      • Leica Cameras
    • Cameras by Body Type
      • Mirrorless Cameras
      • DSLR Cameras
      • Compact Cameras
      • Bridge Cameras
      • Waterproof Cameras
    • Cameras by Lens Mount
      • Sony E Mount Cameras
      • Canon RF Mount Cameras
      • Nikon Z Mount Cameras
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cameras
      • Leica L Mount Cameras
      • Nikon F Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF M Mount Cameras
      • Canon EF S Mount Cameras
      • Pentax KAF Mount Cameras
      • Sony Alpha Mount Cameras
      • Fujifilm G Mount Cameras
      • Sigma SA Mount Cameras
      • Nikon 1 Mount Cameras
  • LENSES
    • All Lenses
    • Lenses by Mount
      • Sony E Mount Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF M Mount Lenses
      • Canon EF S Mount Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Lenses
      • Pentax KAF Mount Lenses
      • Fujifilm G Mount Lenses
      • Sigma SA Mount Lenses
      • Sony Alpha Mount Lenses
    • Teleconverters
    • Cinema Lenses
      • Sony E Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon RF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon Z Mount Cine Lenses
      • Canon EF Mount Cine Lenses
      • Nikon F Mount Cine Lenses
      • ARRI PL Mount Cine Lenses
      • Fujifilm X Mount Cine Lenses
      • Micro Four Thirds Mount Cine Lenses
      • Leica L Mount Cine Lenses
  • TOOLS
    • Cameras
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Lenses
      • Smart Find
      • 1-on-1 Comparison
  • BLOG

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Fujifilm S9900w

16 MP | 1/2.3 CMOS Sensor

Fujifilm S9900w
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Ricoh GR Digital III

10 MP | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) CCD Sensor

Ricoh GR Digital III
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Fujifilm S9900w, which was introduced in January 2015 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 16.0MP sensor whereas Ricoh GR Digital III, which was introduced in July 2009 is a Small Sensor Compact camera with a 10.0MP 1/1.7-inch sensor. As you can see, GR Digital III is 6 years older than S9900w. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Fujifilm S9900w Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2015-01-14
  • 16MP - CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 24-1200 mm F2.9-6.5 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3.00" Fixed Screen
  • 920k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 10.0fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • Built-in Wireless
  • 670g. 123 x 87 x 116 mm

Ricoh GR Digital III Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-07-27
  • 10MP - 1/1.7-inch CCD Sensor
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 28 mm f1.90 Prime Lens
  • 3.00" Fixed Type Screen
  • fps continuous shooting
  • - 640 x 480 video resolution
  • 208g. 109 x 59 x 26 mm
  • Replaced Ricoh GR Digital II Compare

Ricoh GR Digital III was replaced by Ricoh GR Digital IV. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Ricoh GR Digital III
Ricoh GR Digital IV vs Fujifilm S9900w

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.


Related Blog Posts

DPReview to Close
Daily Deals: Sirui Anamorphic Lens, Apple MacBook Air and more
100-400mm Lens Size Comparison: Leica vs Sony vs Canon vs Nikon
Sirui 24mm f2.8 Super35 Anamorphic 1.33x Lens %50 Off
Best Selling Lenses in Micro Four Thirds, Fujifilm X and Canon EF Mounts in 2023
Daily Deals: Sigma 12-24mm Lens, SmallRig Cage, LED Lights and more
Tamron 11-20mm f2.8 Lens for FUJIFILM X is in Development
DZOFilm 12-25mm T2.8 Pictor Parfocal Zoom Cinelens  Released


**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Fujifilm S9900w over Ricoh GR Digital III
Wireless Connection
Built-In vs None Better connectivity
In-built Image Stabilization
Optical vs None Sharper images at longer focal lengths and slow shutter speeds
Viewfinder
Electronic vs Optical (Optional) Better framing and control
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Sensor Resolution
16 MP vs 10 MP 60% more pixels
Max ISO
12.800 vs 1.600 700% higher Max ISO
Focal Length - Wide
24mm vs 28mm 4 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele
1200mm vs 28mm 1172 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
50x vs 1× more flexible focal coverage
Flash Coverage
7.0m vs 3.0m 4m longer range
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 640 x 480 Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Selfie & Vlogger LCD
Yes vs No Rotate LCD for taking Selfies
CHECK S9900w PRICE


Reasons to choose Ricoh GR Digital III over Fujifilm S9900w
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs No Better for flash photography
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
LCD Resolution
920k dots vs 460k dots 100% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/2000s vs 1/1700s faster mechanical shutter
Weight
208 g vs 670 g 462 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide
1.90 vs 2.90 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
1.90 vs 6.50 faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area
4.16µm2 vs 1.76µm2 136% larger pixel area
Built-in ND Filter
Yes vs No Use larger aperture under strong light
CHECK GR Digital III PRICE

Common Strengths of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Timelapse Recording
Yes vs Yes creative shooting
Common Weaknesses of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III
Fixed Screen
Fixed vs No Screen tilts or Flips out independently, perfect for both stills and video
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Fujifilm S9900w has external dimensions of 123 x 87 x 116 mm (4.84 x 3.43 x 4.57″) and weighs 670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz) (including batteries). Ricoh GR Digital III has external dimensions of 109 x 59 x 26 mm (4.29 x 2.32 x 1.02″) and weighs 208 g (0.46 lb / 7.34 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III. Ricoh GR Digital III is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 14mm narrower, 28mm shorter and 90mm thinner than Fujifilm S9900w.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III Size and Weight - Back View

Now lets look at the top view comparison of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III.
Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Camera Size Comparison - Top View
Top View Comparison image of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III Size

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Ricoh GR Digital III is significantly lighter (462g ) than the Fujifilm S9900w which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Fujifilm S9900w nor Ricoh GR Digital III provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Bridge Cameras with Weather Sealing
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.


Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III: Sensor Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w has a 16.0MP (1/2. ) sized CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Ricoh GR Digital III has a 10.0MP 1/1.7-inch (7.44 x 5.58 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features GR engine III processor.

Fujifilm S9900w's sensor provides 6MP more than Ricoh GR Digital III's sensor, which gives a significant advantage in real life. You can print your images larger or crop more freely. On the other hand, please keep in mind that Max sensor resolution is not the only determinant of resolving power. Factors such as the optical elements, low pass filter, pixel size and sensor technology also affects the final resolution of the captured image.

Below you can see the S9900w and GR Digital III sensor size comparison.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III Cameras


As seen above, Ricoh GR Digital III has a infx Larger sensor area than Fujifilm S9900w. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III Lens Specs Comparison

Fujifilm S9900w features a 24-1200 mm F2.9-6.5 50x zoom lens whereas Ricoh GR Digital III features a 28 mm F1.9 Prime lens.

It is not easy to compare a prime lens with a zoom lens. Fujifilm S9900w's zoom lens provides a great flexibility compared to Ricoh GR Digital III's 28mm fixed focal length lens. On the other hand, GR Digital III's prime lens makes it a specialized camera. You compromise the flexibility of a zoom in order to enjoy the high image quality and unique rendering of this fast lens. On the tele end, Fujifilm S9900w has 1172mm longer reach than the Ricoh GR Digital III. However, with a max aperture of f1.90, Ricoh GR Digital III is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

DSLR-Like Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Widest - Samsung WB2200F
Average
Telezoom

Compact Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Longest - Nikon P1000
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Fastest - Olympus 1
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

S9900w
GR Digital III
Fastest - Sony RX10 III
Average
What types of Photography are Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Fujifilm S9900w for Portrait Photography

POOR

Ricoh GR Digital III for Portrait Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No Image Stabilization
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Fujifilm S9900w for Street Photography

AVERAGE

Ricoh GR Digital III for Street Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Medium sized Body
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.90
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No Image Stabilization
Read the details

Fujifilm S9900w for Sports Photography

AVERAGE

Ricoh GR Digital III for Sports Photography

POOR
Image Stabilization
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Exposure Mode
Fast Continuous Shooting: 10.0fps
Wireless Connection
1200 mm Tele Lens
Average Ergonomics&Handling
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1700s
Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.50
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No Image Stabilization
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
28 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Fujifilm S9900w for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Ricoh GR Digital III for Daily Photography

AVERAGE
50.0X Optical Zoom
Medium size Body
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
670g
Body Thickness 116mm
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
208g
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Read the details

Fujifilm S9900w for Landscape Photography

POOR

Ricoh GR Digital III for Landscape Photography

POOR
Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Focus Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 10.0MP
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Fujifilm S9900w vs Ricoh GR Digital III: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Fujifilm S9900w and Ricoh GR Digital III scores compare:

Fujifilm S9900w
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #53 out of 113 in SLR-like (bridge) cameras
Ranked #601 out of 1259 in all Cameras
Ricoh GR Digital III
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #128 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #664 out of 1259 in all Cameras

Fujifilm S9900w has a higher Overall Score than the Ricoh GR Digital III and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Fujifilm S9900w
Fujifilm S9900w
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh GR Digital III
Ricoh GR Digital III
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Ricoh GR Digital III vs Fujifilm S9900w Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Fujifilm S9900w Ricoh GR Digital III
Brand Fujifilm Ricoh
Announced 2015-01-14 2009-07-27
Body Type SLR-like (bridge) Compact
Sensor
Type CMOS CCD
Size 1/1.7-inch
Dimensions 1/2. 7.44 x 5.58 mm
Area 0.00mm2 41.52mm2
Megapixels 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Max Resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Max Native Light sensitivity 12,800 ISO 1,600 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 64 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a n/a
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range 24-1200 mm (50x) 28 mm (1×)
Max Aperture F2.9-6.5 F1.9
Macro Focus Range 7cm 1cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fixed type
Size 3.00" 3.00"
Resolution 460k dots 920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder Resolution 920k dots no electronic viewfinder
Viewfinder Coverage 97% n/a
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1700s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization Optical No
Built-in Flash
Flash Range 7.00 m (with Auto ISO) 3.00 m
External Flash
Continuous Shooting 10.0 fps n/a
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 640 x 480
Video Formats H.264 n/a
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Built-In None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 670g 208g
Dimensions 123 x 87 x 116mm 109 x 59 x 26mm
Battery Life 300 shots n/a
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Sony A7 IV
33 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7R IV
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Canon R3
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon M50 II
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon EF-M Mount
Nikon Z9
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Fujifilm X-T30 II
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Fujifilm GFX 100
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Nikon Z5
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Latest Cameras
Canon R50
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Canon R8
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Panasonic S5 II X
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Panasonic S5 II
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Pentax KF
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Pentax KAF2 Mount
Fujifilm X-T5
40 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R6 II
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A7R V
61 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Copyright © 2023 by CameraDecision
Privacy About Contact Us SpeakerDecision

Report a Correction