Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Casio EX-ZR800

16 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Olympus XZ-10

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing EX-ZR800 and XZ-10, two Compact cameras from Casio and Olympus. Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 is a Small Sensor Superzoom class camera and Olympus Stylus XZ-10 is a Small Sensor Compact class camera.

Casio EX-ZR800 was introduced to market in August 2013 and Olympus XZ-10 was launched in January 2013. There is only 6 months difference between EX-ZR800 and XZ-10 so we are expecting this to be a fair comparison regarding age and technology level.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Casio EX-ZR800 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-08-07

16MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor

ISO 80 - 3200

25-450 mm F3.5-5.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

3.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

1000fps High-Speed Video

222g. 108 x 60 x 31 mm

Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2013-01-30

12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

26-130 mm F1.8-2.7 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3.00" Fixed Type Screen

5.0fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

221g. 102 x 61 x 34 mm

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Related Blog Posts

**This post contains affiliate links and I will be compensated if you make a purchase after clicking through my links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Reasons to choose Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 over Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Battery Life	470 shots vs 240 shots	230 more frames with a single charge
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Focal Length - Wide	25mm vs 26mm	1 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele	450mm vs 130mm	320 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	18× vs 5×	more flexible focal coverage

CHECK EX-ZR800 PRICE

Reasons to choose Olympus Stylus XZ-10 over Casio Exilim EX-ZR800

External Flash Shoe	Yes vs No	Better for flash photography
Touch Screen	Yes vs No	Easy control of camera functions
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Max ISO	6.400 vs 3.200	100% higher Max ISO
Continuous Shooting	5.0fps vs 3.0fps	2 fps faster
Weight	221 g vs 222 g	1 g lighter
Max Aperture - Wide	1.80 vs 3.50	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	2.70 vs 5.90	faster lens at tele
Sensor Pixel Area	2.38µm² vs 1.76µm²	35% larger pixel area
AE Bracketing	Yes vs No	Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR

CHECK XZ-10 PRICE

Common Strengths of Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift vs Sensor-shift	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs Yes	very handy for portraits
LCD Screen Resolution	922k dots vs 920k dots	High resolution screens
Manual Focusing	Yes vs Yes	both have manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure	Yes vs Yes	better exposure control

Common Weaknesses of Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
Environmental Sealing	No vs No	not suitable for tough conditions

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Casio EX-ZR800 has external dimensions of 108 x 60 x 31 mm (4.25 x 2.36 x 1.22″) and weighs 222 g (0.49 lb / 7.83 oz) (including batteries). Olympus XZ-10 has external dimensions of 102 x 61 x 34 mm (4.03 x 2.41 x 1.35″) and weighs 221 g (0.49 lb / 7.80 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10. Casio EX-ZR800 is 1mm shorter and 3mm thinner than Olympus XZ-10 but it is also 6mm wider.

Comparison image of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10.

Comparison image of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Olympus XZ-10 is 1g lighter than the Casio EX-ZR800 but we don't think this will make a significant difference.

Weight Comparison

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 nor Olympus Stylus XZ-10 provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3.00".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10: Sensor Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor and features EXILIM Engine HS 3 processor. On the other hand, Olympus XZ-10 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor .

Below you can see the EX-ZR800 and XZ-10 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 Cameras

Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 have the same sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Olympus XZ-10 has 35% larger pixel area (2.38µm² vs 1.76µm²) compared to Casio EX-ZR800, it has larger pixel area to collect light hence potential to have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10 Lens Specs Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 features a 25-450 mm F3.5-5.9 18× zoom lens whereas Olympus XZ-10 features a 26-130 mm F1.8-2.7 5× zoom lens.

Casio EX-ZR800 has 1mm wider coverage than the Olympus XZ-10. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f1.80, Olympus XZ-10 is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Casio EX-ZR800 has 320mm longer reach than the Olympus XZ-10. However, with a max aperture of f2.70, Olympus XZ-10 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Widest - Olympus TG-850 iHS

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

EX-ZR800

XZ-10

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Casio EX-ZR800 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-10 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Casio EX-ZR800 for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus XZ-10 for Street Photography

EXCELLENT

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Casio EX-ZR800 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-10 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
450 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Slow Continuous Shooting: 3.0fps
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.90
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
35 Focus Points
Fast Lens at Tele: f2.70
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
130 mm Tele Lens
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Poor Battery Life: 240 shots
Read the details

Casio EX-ZR800 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus XZ-10 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
222g
18.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
221g
5.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Read the details

Casio EX-ZR800 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus XZ-10 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
26 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus XZ-10: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 69 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus XZ-10 scores compare:

Casio EX-ZR800

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #64 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #521 out of 1242 in all Cameras

Olympus XZ-10

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #32 out of 477 in Compact cameras
Ranked #427 out of 1242 in all Cameras

Olympus XZ-10 has a higher Overall Score than the Casio EX-ZR800 and would be our choice if we have to decide between these two cameras.

Olympus XZ-10 vs Casio EX-ZR800 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Casio Exilim EX-ZR800	Olympus Stylus XZ-10
Brand	Casio	Olympus
Announced	2013-08-07	2013-01-30
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	CMOS	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	16 megapixels	12 megapixels
Max Resolution	4608 x 3456	3968 x 2976
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	80 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	n/a	35
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	25-450 mm (18×)	26-130 mm (5×)
Max Aperture	F3.5-5.9	F1.8-2.7
Macro Focus Range	4cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3.00"	3.00"
Resolution	922k dots	920k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Built-in Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	4.70 m	n/a
Max Flash Sync	s	n/a
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	3.0 fps	5.0 fps
Multi-Segment Metering
Average Metering
Spot Metering
Partial Metering
AF-Area Metering
Center Weighted Metering
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	MPEG-4, H.264	MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	None	Eye-Fi Connected
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	222g	221g
Dimensions	108 x 60 x 31mm	102 x 61 x 34mm
Battery Life	470 shots	240 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	None
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction