Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs.
In this section, We are going to illustrate Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Casio EX-H20G has external dimensions of 103 x 68 x 29 mm (4.06 x 2.68 x 1.14″) and weighs 216 g (0.48 lb / 7.62 oz) (including batteries). Olympus XZ-2 iHS has external dimensions of 113 x 65 x 48 mm (4.45 x 2.56 x 1.89″) and weighs 346 g (0.76 lb / 12.20 oz) (including batteries).
Below you can see the front view size comparison of Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. Casio EX-H20G is 10mm narrower and 19mm thinner than Olympus XZ-2 iHS but it is also 3mm taller.
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Camera Size Comparison - Front View]()
Comparison image of Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View
Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day.
Casio EX-H20G is significantly lighter (130g ) than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.
Weight Comparison
Compact Cameras
Thickness Comparison
Compact Cameras
Weather Sealing
Unfortunately neither Casio Exilim EX-H20G nor Olympus XZ-2 iHS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections: Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
LCD Screen Size and Features
Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".
On the other hand, Olympus XZ-2 iHS features a
Tilting screen where you can change the angle of the screen to make it easier to shoot from waist or over the head levels whereas the Casio EX-H20G has a fixed type screen which provides less flexibility in shooting positions compared to XZ-2 iHS.
Casio EX-H20G has a 14.0MP 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor and features Exilim Engine HS processor. On the other hand, Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a 12.0MP 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm ) sized CMOS sensor .
Below you can see the EX-H20G and XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison.
![Casio EX-H20G vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Size Comparison]()
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Cameras
As seen above, Olympus XZ-2 iHS has a 1.5x Larger sensor area than Casio EX-H20G. Larger sensors give photographer more control on the depth of field and blurry background compared to smaller sensor when shot in same focal length and aperture.
Casio EX-H20G features a 24-240 mm F3.2-5.7 10× zoom lens whereas Olympus XZ-2 iHS features a 28-112 mm F1.8-2.5 4x zoom lens.
Casio EX-H20G has 4mm wider coverage than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f1.80, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is faster at widest end.
On the tele end, Casio EX-H20G has 128mm longer reach than the Olympus XZ-2 iHS. However, with a max aperture of f2.50, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is faster at tele end.
Wide Coverage
Compact Cameras
Max Aperture at Tele
Compact Cameras
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Max Aperture at Wide
Compact Cameras
In this section, we rank and compare Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.
Casio EX-H20G for Portrait Photography
Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Portrait Photography
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Casio EX-H20G for Street Photography
Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Street Photography
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Tilting LCD Screen
Fast Lens at Wide: f1.80
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Optional External Viewfinder
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
Read the details
Casio EX-H20G for Sports Photography
Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Sports Photography
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
240 mm Tele Lens
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Unknown Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
35 Focus Points
Optional External Viewfinder
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
112 mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Casio EX-H20G for Daily Photography
Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Daily Photography
Compact Body
216g
10.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
346g
Body Thickness 48mm
Read the details
Casio EX-H20G for Landscape Photography
Olympus XZ-2 iHS for Landscape Photography
Manual Focus Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Built-in GPS
Average Resolution Sensor: 14.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
28 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects.
Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.
Here is a summary of how Casio EX-H20G and Olympus XZ-2 iHS scores compare:
Casio EX-H20G
Ranked
#242 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked
#833 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Ranked
#8 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked
#285 out of 1220 in all Cameras
Olympus XZ-2 iHS is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Casio EX-H20G in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Casio EX-H20G. Otherwise, Olympus XZ-2 iHS is the better camera overall.
| General |
Casio Exilim EX-H20G |
Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Brand |
Casio |
Olympus |
| Announced |
2010-09-20 |
2012-12-18 |
| Body Type |
Compact |
Compact |
Sensor |
|
|
| Type |
CCD |
CMOS |
| Size |
1/2.3" |
1/1.7" |
| Dimensions |
6.17 x 4.55 mm |
7.44 x 5.58 mm |
| Area |
28.07mm2 |
41.52mm2 |
| Megapixels |
14 megapixels |
12 megapixels |
| Max Resolution |
4320 x 3240 |
3968 x 2976 |
| Max Native Light sensitivity |
3,200 ISO |
12,800 ISO |
| Min Native Light sensitivity |
64 ISO |
100 ISO |
| RAW Support |
|
|
Autofocus |
|
|
| AF Touch |
|
|
| AF Continuous |
|
|
| AF Single |
|
|
| AF Tracking |
|
|
| AF Selective |
|
|
| AF Center |
|
|
| AF Multi Area |
|
|
| AF Live View |
|
|
| AF Face Detection |
|
|
| AF Contrast Detection |
|
|
| AF Phase Detection |
|
|
| Number of Focus Points |
n/a |
35 |
Lens |
|
|
| Manual Focus |
|
|
| Lens Mount |
fixed lens |
fixed lens |
| Lens Focal Range |
24-240 mm (10×) |
28-112 mm (4x) |
| Max Aperture |
F3.2-5.7 |
F1.8-2.5 |
| Macro Focus Range |
7cm |
1cm |
Screen |
|
|
| Type |
Fixed type |
Tilting |
| Size |
3" |
3" |
| Resolution |
461k dots |
920k dots |
| Touch Screen |
|
|
Viewfinder |
|
|
| Viewfinder |
None |
Electronic (optional) |
Photography Features |
|
|
| Max Mechanical Shutter |
1/2000s |
1/2000s |
| Shutter Priority |
|
|
| Aperture Priority |
|
|
| Manual Exposure Mode |
|
|
| Custom White Balance |
|
|
| Image Stabilization |
Sensor-shift |
Sensor-shift |
| Built-in Flash |
|
|
| Flash Range |
n/a |
8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Max Flash Sync |
s |
n/a |
| External Flash |
|
|
| Multi-Segment |
|
|
| Average |
|
|
| Spot |
|
|
| Partial |
|
|
| AF-Area |
|
|
| Center Weighted |
|
|
| AE Bracketing |
|
|
| WB Bracketing |
|
|
Video Features |
|
|
| Max Video Resolution |
1280 x 720 |
1920 x 1080 |
| Video Formats |
H.264 |
MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone Port |
|
|
| Headphone Port |
|
|
Connectivity |
|
|
| Wireless Connectivity |
Eye-Fi Connected |
Eye-Fi Connected |
| HDMI |
|
|
Physical |
|
|
| Environmental Sealing |
|
|
| Weight |
216g |
346g |
| Dimensions |
103 x 68 x 29mm |
113 x 65 x 48mm |
| Battery Life |
n/a |
340 shots |
Other Features |
|
|
| Timelapse Recording |
|
|
| GPS |
BuiltIn |
None |
DxO Sensor Scores |
|
|
| DxO Overall Score |
not tested |
49 |
| DxO Color Depth |
not tested |
20.4 |
| DxO Dynamic Range |
not tested |
11.3 |
| DxO Low Light ISO |
not tested |
216 |
|
Report a correction |
Report a correction |