Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison

Camera to replace

Change

Casio EX-H10

12 MP | 1/2.3 CCD Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Change

Olympus TG-4

16 MP | 1/2.3 BSI-CMOS Sensor

CHECK PRICE

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4 Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Casio EX-H10, which was introduced in June 2009 is a Small Sensor Compact camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Olympus TG-4, which was introduced in April 2015 is a Waterproof camera with a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, EX-H10 is 6 years older than TG-4. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Casio EX-H10 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2009-06-11

12MP - 1/2.3-inch CCD Sensor

ISO 64 - 3200

24-240 mm F3.2-5.7 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

4 fps continuous shooting

HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution

194g. 102 x 62 x 24 mm

Olympus TG-4 Key Specs

Announcement Date: 2015-04-13

16MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor

ISO 100 - 6400

25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 Zoom Lens

Sensor-shift Image Stabilization

3" Fixed Type Screen

5.0 fps continuous shooting

Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution

Built-in Wireless

Built-in GPS

247g. 112 x 66 x 31 mm

Weather Sealed Body

Replaced Olympus Tough TG-3 Compare

Olympus TG-4 was replaced by Olympus Tough TG-5. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Olympus Tough TG-4
Olympus Tough TG-5 vs Casio Exilim EX-H10

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Casio Exilim EX-H10 over Olympus Tough TG-4

Weight	194 g vs 247 g	53 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide	24mm vs 25mm	1 mm wider coverage
Focal Length - Tele	240mm vs 100mm	140 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom	10× vs 4x	more flexible focal coverage
Sensor Pixel Area	2.34µm² vs 1.76µm²	32% larger pixel area

Reasons to choose Olympus Tough TG-4 over Casio Exilim EX-H10

Wireless Connection	Built-In vs Eye-Fi Connected	Better connectivity
Live Composite Mode	Yes vs No	Excellent help for long-exposure photography
GPS	BuiltIn vs None	track your location
RAW Support	Yes vs No	Better image quality
Face Detection Focus	Yes vs No	very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution	16 MP vs 12 MP	33% more pixels
Max ISO	6.400 vs 3.200	100% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Resolution	460k dots vs 230k dots	99% higher resolution screen
Continuous Shooting	5.0fps vs 4.0fps	1 fps faster
Environmental Sealing	Yes vs No	shoot at tough conditions
Timelapse Recording	Yes vs No	creative shooting
Max Aperture - Wide	2.00 vs 3.20	faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele	4.90 vs 5.70	faster lens at tele
Flash Coverage	7.9m vs 3.6m	4.3m longer range
Max Video Resolution	1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720	Higher Resolution Video
Focus Bracketing	Yes vs No	Take multiple photos shifting focus point
Focus Stacking	Yes vs No	Stacks photos in-camera to maximize depth of field
Smartphone Remote	Yes vs No	Remote control your camera with a smartphone

Common Strengths of Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Tough TG-4

Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift vs Sensor-shift	Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash	Yes vs Yes	Useful in low-light
Manual Focusing	Yes vs Yes	both have manual focusing modes

Common Weaknesses of Casio Exilim EX-H10 and Olympus Tough TG-4

Fixed Screen	Fixed Type vs No	No flexible viewing angles
External Flash Shoe	No vs No	Not suitable for flash photography
Viewfinder	None vs None	No eye-level shooting option
LCD Screen Resolution	230k dots vs 460k dots	Low resolution screens
Manual Exposure	No vs No	No manual exposure control
AE Bracketing	No vs No	Not good for multi-exposure HDR

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Casio EX-H10 has external dimensions of 102 x 62 x 24 mm (4.02 x 2.44 x 0.94″) and weighs 194 g (0.43 lb / 6.84 oz) (including batteries). Olympus TG-4 has external dimensions of 112 x 66 x 31 mm (4.41 x 2.6 x 1.22″) and weighs 247 g (0.54 lb / 8.71 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4. Casio EX-H10 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 10mm narrower, 4mm shorter and 7mm thinner than Olympus TG-4.

Comparison image of Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Casio EX-H10 is significantly lighter (53g ) than the Olympus TG-4 which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Min

Average

Max

Thickness Comparison

Waterproof Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Min

Average

Max

Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4's LCD screens has the same diagonal size of 3".

Unfortunately, both cameras has fixed screens so they don't tilt or flip in directions.

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4: Sensor Comparison

Casio EX-H10 has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CCD sensor . On the other hand, Olympus TG-4 has a 16.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features TruePic VII processor.

Below you can see the EX-H10 and TG-4 sensor size comparison.

Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 Cameras

Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Casio EX-H10 has 32% larger pixel area compared to Olympus TG-4, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4 Lens Specs Comparison

Casio EX-H10 features a 24-240 mm F3.2-5.7 10× zoom lens whereas Olympus TG-4 features a 25-100 mm F2.0-4.9 4x zoom lens.

Casio EX-H10 has 1mm wider coverage than the Olympus TG-4. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f2.00, Olympus TG-4 is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Casio EX-H10 has 140mm longer reach than the Olympus TG-4. However, with a max aperture of f4.90, Olympus TG-4 is faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Widest - Ricoh WG-M1

Average

Telezoom

Compact Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Longest - Canon SX520 HS

Average

Max Aperture at Tele

Compact Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV

Average

Max Aperture at Wide

Compact Cameras

EX-H10

TG-4

Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6

Average

What types of Photography are Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 Good for?

In this section, we rank and compare Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Casio EX-H10 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details

Casio EX-H10 for Street Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-4 for Street Photography

GOOD

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fast Lens at Wide: f2.00
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Built-in Viewfinder
Read the details

Casio EX-H10 for Sports Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Sports Photography

POOR

Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
240 mm Tele Lens
Average Continuous Shooting: 4.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f5.70
Read the details

Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
25 Focus Points
Wireless Connection
Average Continuous Shooting: 5.0fps
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
No Manual Exposure Mode
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
100 mm Tele Lens
Read the details

Casio EX-H10 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Olympus TG-4 for Daily Photography

GOOD

Compact Body
194g
10.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
Read the details

RAW shooting capability
Compact Body
247g
Environmental Sealings
4.0X Optical Zoom
Small 1/2.3 sensor
Read the details

Casio EX-H10 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Olympus TG-4 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Manual Focus Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Manual Exposure Mode
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Manual Focus Mode
Environmental Sealings
Built-in GPS
25 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 16.0MP
Small 1/2.3 sensor
No Manual Exposure Mode
Read the details

Casio EX-H10 vs Olympus TG-4: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Casio EX-H10 and Olympus TG-4 scores compare:

Casio EX-H10

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #301 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #933 out of 1225 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-4

Imaging

Features

Value

Portability

Overall

Ranked #18 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #336 out of 1225 in all Cameras

Olympus TG-4 is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Casio EX-H10 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Casio EX-H10. Otherwise, Olympus TG-4 is the better camera overall.

Olympus TG-4 vs Casio EX-H10 Specs Table

Detailed comparison of specifications

General	Casio Exilim EX-H10	Olympus Tough TG-4
Brand	Casio	Olympus
Announced	2009-06-11	2015-04-13
Body Type	Compact	Compact
Sensor
Type	CCD	BSI-CMOS
Size	1/2.3-inch	1/2.3-inch
Dimensions	6.17 x 4.55 mm	6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area	28.07mm²	28.07mm²
Megapixels	12 megapixels	16 megapixels
Max Resolution	4000 x 3000	4608 x 3456
Max Native Light sensitivity	3,200 ISO	6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity	64 ISO	100 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points	n/a	25
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount	fixed lens	fixed lens
Lens Focal Range	24-240 mm (10×)	25-100 mm (4x)
Max Aperture	F3.2-5.7	F2.0-4.9
Macro Focus Range	7cm	1cm
Screen
Type	Fixed type	Fixed type
Size	3"	3"
Resolution	230k dots	460k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder	None	None
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter	1/2000s	1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization	Sensor-shift	Sensor-shift
Built-in Flash
Flash Range	3.60 m	7.90 m (at ISO 1600)
External Flash
Continuous Shooting	4.0 fps	5.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution	1280 x 720	1920 x 1080
Video Formats	Motion JPEG	H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity	Eye-Fi Connected	Built-In
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight	194g	247g
Dimensions	102 x 62 x 24mm	112 x 66 x 31mm
Battery Life	n/a	380 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS	None	Built-in
DxO Sensor Scores
	Report a correction	Report a correction