CameraDecision
  • CAMERAS
  • LENSES
  • TOOLS
    • Smart Find
    • 1-on-1 Comparison
    • Size Comparison
  • BRANDS
    • Sony Cameras
    • Canon Cameras
    • Nikon Cameras
    • Pentax Cameras
    • Fujifilm Cameras
    • Olympus Cameras
    • Panasonic Cameras
    • Leica Cameras
    • Samsung Cameras
  • BODY TYPE
    • Mirrorless Cameras
    • DSLR Cameras
    • Compact Cameras
    • Bridge Cameras
    • Waterproof Cameras

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Comparison

x
Camera to replace
Change

Casio EX-FC100

9 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) CMOS Sensor

Casio EX-FC100
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Change

Canon SX50 HS

12 MP | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) BSI-CMOS Sensor

Canon SX50 HS
CHECK PRICE
CHECK PRICE
Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Comparison Overview

Here we are comparing two cameras with different body types: Casio EX-FC100, which was introduced in January 2009 is a Small Sensor Compact camera with a 9.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor whereas Canon SX50 HS, which was introduced in January 2013 is a Small Sensor Superzoom camera with a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch sensor. As you can see, EX-FC100 is 4 years older than SX50 HS. Let's see if this age difference between two cameras makes a big difference.

Here is a brief look at the main features of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS before getting into our more detailed comparison.

Casio EX-FC100 Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2009-01-08
  • 9MP - 1/2.3-inch CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Mount
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 2.7" Fixed Type Screen
  • continuous shooting
  • HD - 1280 x 720 video resolution
  • 156g. 100 x 59 x 23 mm

Canon SX50 HS Key Specs

  • Announcement Date: 2013-01-15
  • 12MP - 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS Sensor
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • 24-1200 mm F3.4-6.5 Zoom Lens
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 2.8" Fully Articulated Screen
  • 202k dot Electronic viewfinder
  • 2 fps continuous shooting
  • Full HD - 1920 x 1080 video resolution
  • 240fps High-Speed Video
  • 595g. 123 x 87 x 106 mm
  • Replaced Canon PowerShot SX40 HS Compare

Canon SX50 HS was replaced by Canon PowerShot SX60 HS. You may also be interested in these comparisons:
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS vs Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon PowerShot SX60 HS vs Casio Exilim EX-FC100

Let's read on the following sections in order to better understand in detail how Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS compares and hopefully end up with enough arguments to decide which one is better for you.

Reasons to choose Casio Exilim EX-FC100 over Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Weight
156 g vs 595 g 439 g lighter
Focal Length - Wide
mm vs 24mm 24 mm wider coverage
Sensor Pixel Area
3.13µm2 vs 2.34µm2 33% larger pixel area


Reasons to choose Canon PowerShot SX50 HS over Casio Exilim EX-FC100
LCD Screen
Fully Articulated vs Fixed Type Flexible shooting positions
External Flash Shoe
Yes vs No Better for flash photography
Viewfinder
Electronic vs None Better framing and control
RAW Support
Yes vs No Better image quality
Face Detection Focus
Yes vs No very handy for portraits
Max Sensor Resolution
12 MP vs 9 MP 33% more pixels
Max ISO
6.400 vs 1.600 300% higher Max ISO
LCD Screen Size
2.8" vs 2.7" 0.1 inches larger display
LCD Screen Resolution
461k dots vs 230k dots 100% higher resolution screen
Max Mech. Shutter
1/2000s vs 1/1000s faster mechanical shutter
Focal Length - Tele
1200mm vs mm 1200 mm longer tele reach
Optical Zoom
50x vs more flexible focal coverage
Max Aperture - Wide
3.40 vs 3.60 faster lens at wide
Max Aperture - Tele
6.50 vs 8.50 faster lens at tele
Max Video Resolution
1920 x 1080 vs 1280 x 720 Higher Resolution Video
AE Bracketing
Yes vs No Useful for tough lighting conditions and HDR
Selfie & Vlogger Friendly LCD
Yes vs No Rotate LCD for taking Selfies

Common Strengths of Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Image Stabilization
Sensor-shift vs Optical Sharper images at longer focal lengths and long exposures
Built-in Flash
Yes vs Yes Useful in low-light
Manual Focusing
Yes vs Yes both have manual focusing modes
Manual Exposure
Yes vs Yes better exposure control
Focal Length - Wide
mm vs 24mm Very good wide angle coverage
Common Weaknesses of Casio Exilim EX-FC100 and Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
LCD Screen Size
2.7" vs 2.8" Small display
LCD Screen Resolution
230k dots vs 461k dots Low resolution screens
Continuous Shooting
fps vs 2.0fps Slow shooting speeds
Environmental Sealing
No vs No not suitable for tough conditions
Max Aperture - Tele
8.50 vs 6.50 Slow lenses at tele
Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS: Physical Specs and Body features Comparison

Size and weight is a big decision factor when you are trying to find the ideal camera for your needs. In this section, We are going to illustrate Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS side-by-side from the front, back and top in their relative dimensions. Casio EX-FC100 has external dimensions of 100 x 59 x 23 mm (3.94 x 2.32 x 0.91″) and weighs 156 g (0.34 lb / 5.50 oz) (including batteries). Canon SX50 HS has external dimensions of 123 x 87 x 106 mm (4.84 x 3.43 x 4.17″) and weighs 595 g (1.31 lb / 20.99 oz) (including batteries).

Below you can see the front view size comparison of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS. Casio EX-FC100 is clearly the smaller of the two cameras. Its body is 23mm narrower, 28mm shorter and 83mm thinner than Canon SX50 HS.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Camera Size Comparison - Front View
Comparison image of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS Size, Weight and External Dimensions - Front View

Here is the back view size comparison of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Camera Size Comparison - Back View
Comparison image of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS Size and Weight - Back View

Weight is another important factor especially when deciding on a camera that you want to carry with you all day. Casio EX-FC100 is significantly lighter (439g ) than the Canon SX50 HS which may become a big advantage especially on long walking trips.

Weight Comparison

Bridge Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Min
Average
Max
Thickness Comparison

Bridge Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Min
Average
Max

Weather Sealing

Unfortunately neither Casio Exilim EX-FC100 nor Canon PowerShot SX50 HS provides any type of weather sealing in their body, so you have to give extra care especially when you are shooting outdoors. If weather sealing is a must-have feature for you, check these sections:
Top Compact Cameras with Weather Sealing
Top Bridge Cameras with Weather Sealing

LCD Screen Size and Features

Canon SX50 HS's 2.8" LCD screen is slightly larger than Casio EX-FC100's 2.7" screen.

Moreover, Canon SX50 HS sports a Fully Articulated screen which you can change the angle and position of the screen almost freely, making it possible to shoot from waist or over the head levels, and especially very useful for shooting selfies and video. On the other hand, Casio EX-FC100 has a fixed type screen which provides almost no flexibility in shooting positions compared to SX50 HS.
Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS: Sensor Comparison

Casio EX-FC100 has a 9.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized CMOS sensor . On the other hand, Canon SX50 HS has a 12.0MP 1/2.3-inch (6.17 x 4.55 mm ) sized BSI-CMOS sensor and features Digic 5 processor.

Below you can see the EX-FC100 and SX50 HS sensor size comparison.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor Size and Resolution Comparison image of Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS Cameras


Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS have sensor sizes so they will provide same level of control over the depth of field when used with same focal length and aperture. On the other hand, since Casio EX-FC100 has 33% larger pixel area compared to Canon SX50 HS, it has potential to collect more light on pixel level hence have less noise in low light / High ISO images.

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS Lens Specs Comparison

Casio EX-FC100 features a F3.6-8.5 zoom lens whereas Canon SX50 HS features a 24-1200 mm F3.4-6.5 50x zoom lens.

Casio EX-FC100 has 24mm wider coverage than the Canon SX50 HS. On the other hand, with a max aperture of f3.40, Canon SX50 HS is faster at widest end. On the tele end, Canon SX50 HS has 1200mm longer reach than the Casio EX-FC100. At f6.50, it is also faster at tele end.

Wide Coverage

Compact Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Widest - Ricoh WG-M1
Average
Telezoom

DSLR-Like Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Longest - Canon SX520 HS
Average
Max Aperture at Tele

DSLR-Like Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Fastest - Ricoh GR Digital IV
Average
Max Aperture at Wide

DSLR-Like Cameras

EX-FC100
SX50 HS
Fastest - Leica D-Lux 6
Average
What types of Photography are Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS Good for?
In this section, we rank and compare Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS for five different photography types in order to make your decision process easier in case you are specifically interested in one or more of these areas.

Casio EX-FC100 for Portrait Photography

POOR

Canon SX50 HS for Portrait Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 9.0MP
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Read the details

Casio EX-FC100 for Street Photography

GOOD

Canon SX50 HS for Street Photography

GOOD
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Small Body
Live-view
mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
No Built-in Viewfinder
Slow Lens at Wide: f3.60
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Live-view
Face-Detection Focusing
Fully Articulated LCD Screen
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Medium sized Body
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Read the details

Casio EX-FC100 for Sports Photography

POOR

Canon SX50 HS for Sports Photography

AVERAGE
Image Stabilization
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
No RAW shooting capability
No External Flash Shoe
No Built-in Viewfinder
Not so good Ergonomics&Handling
Environmental Sealings
Slow Max shutter speed: 1/1000s
Focus Points
mm Tele Lens
Read the details
Image Stabilization
RAW shooting capability
External Flash Shoe
Electronic Built-in Viewfinder
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
1200 mm Tele Lens
Average Ergonomics&Handling
Average Max shutter speed: 1/2000s
Slow Continuous Shooting: 2.0fps
Environmental Sealings
9 Focus Points
Slow Lens at Tele: f6.50
Read the details

Casio EX-FC100 for Daily Photography

AVERAGE

Canon SX50 HS for Daily Photography

GOOD
Compact Body
156g
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No RAW shooting capability
X Optical Zoom
Read the details
RAW shooting capability
50.0X Optical Zoom
Medium size Body
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
595g
Body Thickness 106mm
Read the details

Casio EX-FC100 for Landscape Photography

POOR

Canon SX50 HS for Landscape Photography

POOR
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
Very Low Resolution Sensor: 9.0MP
No RAW shooting capability
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details
Manual Focus Mode
Manual Exposure Mode
24 mm - Good Wide Angle Coverage
Average Resolution Sensor: 12.0MP
Small 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) sensor
No Environmental Sealings
Read the details

Casio EX-FC100 vs Canon SX50 HS: OUR DECISION

You may have already made your decision about which camera suits better for your needs and your budget so far but in case you wonder how we rated Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS, below you can find their scores in five different aspects. Our Decision Algorithm dynamically scores cameras using 63 different specs, current price and DxO Mark scores (where possible) in order to make a more objective and consistent comparison.

Here is a summary of how Casio EX-FC100 and Canon SX50 HS scores compare:

Casio EX-FC100
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #202 out of 475 in Compact cameras
Ranked #775 out of 1223 in all Cameras
Canon SX50 HS
Imaging
Features
Value
Portability
Overall
Ranked #27 out of 113 in SLR-like (bridge) cameras
Ranked #391 out of 1223 in all Cameras

Canon SX50 HS is the overall winner of this comparison. It has a higher Overall Score and beats Casio EX-FC100 in all criteria except one: Portability.
If small size and light body is a big priority for you, choose Casio EX-FC100. Otherwise, Canon SX50 HS is the better camera overall.

Casio EX-FC100
Casio EX-FC100
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon SX50 HS
Canon SX50 HS
CHECK PRICE

CHECK PRICE

Canon SX50 HS vs Casio EX-FC100 Specs Table
Detailed comparison of specifications
General Casio Exilim EX-FC100 Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Brand Casio Canon
Announced 2009-01-08 2013-01-15
Body Type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor
Type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Size 1/2.3-inch 1/2.3-inch
Dimensions 6.17 x 4.55 mm 6.17 x 4.55 mm
Area 28.07mm2 28.07mm2
Megapixels 9 megapixels 12 megapixels
Max Resolution 3456 x 2592 4000 x 3000
Max Native Light sensitivity 1,600 ISO 6,400 ISO
Min Native Light sensitivity 100 ISO 80 ISO
RAW Support
Autofocus
AF Touch
AF Continuous
AF Single
AF Tracking
AF Selective
AF Center
AF Multi Area
AF Live View
AF Face Detection
AF Contrast Detection
AF Phase Detection
Number of Focus Points n/a 9
Lens
Manual Focus
Lens Mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens Focal Range no lens 24-1200 mm (50x)
Max Aperture F3.6-8.5 F3.4-6.5
Macro Focus Range n/a 0cm
Screen
Type Fixed type Fully Articulated
Size 2.7" 2.8"
Resolution 230k dots 461k dots
Touch Screen
Viewfinder
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder Resolution no electronic viewfinder 202k dots
Viewfinder Coverage n/a 100%
Photography Features
Max Mechanical Shutter 1/1000s 1/2000s
Shutter Priority
Aperture Priority
Manual Exposure Mode
Custom White Balance
Image Stabilization Sensor-shift Optical
Built-in Flash
Flash Range n/a 5.50 m
Max Flash Sync s 1/2000s
External Flash
Continuous Shooting n/a 2.0 fps
Multi-Segment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF-Area
Center Weighted
AE Bracketing
WB Bracketing
Video Features
Max Video Resolution 1280 x 720 1920 x 1080
Video Formats Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone Port
Headphone Port
Connectivity
Wireless Connectivity Eye-Fi Connected None
HDMI
Physical
Environmental Sealing
Weight 156g 595g
Dimensions 100 x 59 x 23mm 123 x 87 x 106mm
Battery Life n/a 315 shots
Other Features
Timelapse Recording
GPS None None
DxO Sensor Scores
DxO Overall Score not tested 47
DxO Color Depth not tested 20.3
DxO Dynamic Range not tested 11.2
DxO Low Light ISO not tested 179
Report a correction Report a correction


FOLLOW US


Most Popular Cameras
Nikon Z7
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Sony A6000
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Sony A7 III
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Fujifilm X-T3
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Canon R
30 MP | Full frame Sensor | Canon RF Mount
Sony A6400
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Sony E Mount
Nikon D5600
24 MP | APS-C Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Nikon D850
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon F Mount
Top Rated Compact Cameras
Top Compact Cameras Under $200
Top Compact Cameras Under $500
Top Compact Cameras Under $750
Top Compact Cameras Under $1000
Top Rated Bridge Cameras
Top Bridge Cameras Under $200
Top Bridge Cameras Under $500
Top Bridge Cameras Under $750
Top Bridge Cameras Under $1000
Latest Cameras
Fujifilm GFX 100S
102 MP | Medium format Sensor | Fujifilm G Mount
Fujifilm X-E4
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Sony a1
50 MP | Full frame Sensor | Sony E Mount
Leica SL2-S
24 MP | Full frame Sensor | Leica L Mount
Leica Q2 Monochrom
47 MP | Full frame Sensor | 28 mm
Fujifilm X-S10
26 MP | APS-C Sensor | Fujifilm X Mount
Nikon Z7 II
46 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Nikon Z6 II
25 MP | Full frame Sensor | Nikon Z Mount
Copyright © 2021 by CameraDecision
About Feedback Privacy Cameras

Report a Correction